Chew Min Tze, Ilhan Emre, Dennis Sarah, Nicholson Leslie L, Kobayashi Sarah, Chan Cliffton
Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The Susan Wakil Health Building, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70186. doi: 10.1111/hex.70186.
The Hypermobile Online Pain managemEnt (HOPE) programme is a stakeholder informed intervention adopting the biopsychosocial pain approach, specifically for people with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) experiencing pain. The programme topics included were based on a modified Delphi of a large sample of stakeholders: people with hEDS/HSD and healthcare practitioners who are experienced with managing these conditions. Programme feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness were previously evaluated quantitatively in a pilot randomised controlled trial, but the in-depth experiences and perceptions of participants who engaged with the programme is unknown.
Qualitative study. 1:1, semi-structured online interviews of participants who took part in the HOPE programme. Data was analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach as described by Braun and Clark.
Twelve participants were interviewed; 91% were female, mean age 38.1 (SD 9.1). Four themes emerged: (1) The biopsychosocial approach to understanding pain used in the HOPE programme was acceptable and appropriate, (2) benefits of the programme were stronger for those who were newer on their hEDS/HSD journey, (3) self-guided reflections included in the programme required headspace and personal meaning and (4) participants desired more adaptable content and programme functionality. Additionally, participants gave suggestions on how to improve the content, adherence and engagement to the programme.
The HOPE programme was considered feasible, acceptable and appropriate for people with hEDS/HSD. The four themes and suggestions from our study findings will be used to refine subsequent versions and large-scale trials of the HOPE programme, as well as provide translatable insights for other online interventions for hEDS/HSD or similar complex, chronic multisystemic conditions.
A large community of hEDS/HSD patients' and healthcare providers' input were obtained from a two-staged online Delphi from a prior study. This approach was preferred to capture the greatest amount of feedback from a diverse international voice. Via the Delphi study, they provided suggestions for content topics and consensus on what they felt were important to include in a hEDS/HSD specific online pain management programme, as well as programme parameters (e.g., duration and frequency of programme; healthcare provider telehealth component; types of learning activities).
高活动度在线疼痛管理(HOPE)项目是一种基于生物心理社会疼痛方法的利益相关者参与的干预措施,专门针对患有高活动度型埃勒斯-当洛综合征(hEDS)和高活动度谱系障碍(HSD)且经历疼痛的人群。该项目涵盖的主题基于对大量利益相关者进行的改良德尔菲法:hEDS/HSD患者以及有这些疾病管理经验的医疗从业者。此前在一项试点随机对照试验中对该项目的可行性、可接受性和适宜性进行了定量评估,但参与该项目的参与者的深入体验和看法尚不清楚。
定性研究。对参与HOPE项目的参与者进行一对一的半结构化在线访谈。采用布劳恩和克拉克所描述的归纳主题分析方法对数据进行分析。
访谈了12名参与者;91%为女性,平均年龄38.1岁(标准差9.1)。出现了四个主题:(1)HOPE项目中用于理解疼痛的生物心理社会方法是可接受且适宜的,(2)对于那些刚开始患有hEDS/HSD的人来说,该项目的益处更大,(3)项目中包含的自我引导反思需要空间和个人意义,(4)参与者希望内容和项目功能更具适应性。此外,参与者就如何改进项目内容、依从性和参与度提出了建议。
HOPE项目被认为对患有hEDS/HSD的人是可行、可接受且适宜的。我们研究结果中的四个主题和建议将用于完善HOPE项目的后续版本和大规模试验,并为其他针对hEDS/HSD或类似复杂慢性多系统疾病的在线干预提供可转化的见解。
通过之前一项研究的两阶段在线德尔菲法,获得了大量hEDS/HSD患者和医疗服务提供者的意见。这种方法更受青睐,以便从不同的国际声音中获取最多的反馈。通过德尔菲研究,他们为内容主题提供了建议,并就他们认为在hEDS/HSD特定的在线疼痛管理项目中重要的内容以及项目参数(如项目时长和频率;医疗服务提供者的远程医疗部分;学习活动类型)达成了共识。