• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对长期患病者的社会心理需求及其对在线同伴支持看法的定性探索。

A qualitative exploration of the psychosocial needs of people living with long-term conditions and their perspectives on online peer support.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):2075-2088. doi: 10.1111/hex.13814. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13814
PMID:37458403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10485302/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20% of people with a long-term condition (LTC) experience depressive symptoms (subthreshold depression [SUBD]). People with SUBD experience depressive symptoms that do not meet the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder. However, there is currently no targeted psychological support for people with LTCs also experiencing SUBD. Online peer support is accessible, inexpensive and scalable, and might offer a way of bridging the gap in psychosocial care for LTC patients. This article explores the psychosocial needs of people living with LTCs and investigates their perspectives on online peer support interventions to inform their future design.

METHODS

Through a co-produced participatory approach, online focus groups were completed with people with lived experience of LTCs. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis (TA) was conducted adopting a critical-realist approach and an inductive analysis methodology that sought to follow participants' priorities and concerns.

RESULTS

Ten people with a range of LTCs participated across three online focus groups, lasting an average of 95 (±10.1) min. The mean age was 57 (±11.4) years and 60% of participants identified as female. The three key emerging themes were: (1) relationship between self and outside world; (2) past experiences of peer support; and (3) philosophy and vision of peer support. Adults living with LTCs shared their past experiences of peer support and explored their perspectives on how future online peer support platforms may support their psychosocial needs.

CONCLUSION

Despite the negative impact(s) of having a long-term physical health condition on mental health, physical and mental healthcare are often treated as separate entities. The need for an integrated approach for people with LTCs was clear. Implementation of online peer support to bridge this gap was supported, but there was a clear consensus that these interventions need to be co-produced and carefully designed to ensure they feel safe and not commercialised or prescriptive. Shared explorations of the potential benefits and concerns of these online spaces can shape the philosophy and vision of future platforms.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This work is set within a wider project which is developing an online peer support platform for those living with LTCs. A participatory, co-produced approach is integral to this work. The initial vision was steered by the experiences of our Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) groups, who emphasised the therapeutic value of peer-to-peer interaction. The focus groups confirmed the importance and potential benefit of this project. This paper represents the perspectives of PPI members who collaborate on research and public engagement at the mental-physical interface. A separate, independent Research Advisory Group (RAG), formed of members also living with LTCs, co-produced study documents, topic guides, and informed key decision-making processes. Finally, our co-investigator with lived experience (E. A.F.) undertook the analysis and write-up alongside colleagues, further strengthening the interpretation and resonance of our work. She shares first joint authorship, and as a core member of the research team, ensures that the conduct of the study is firmly grounded in the experience of people living with LTCs.

摘要

简介

大约 20%患有长期疾病(LTC)的人会出现抑郁症状(阈下抑郁[SUBD])。患有 SUBD 的人会出现抑郁症状,但不符合重度抑郁症的诊断标准。然而,目前对于同时患有 LTC 和 SUBD 的人,并没有针对其的特定心理支持。在线同伴支持是一种可及的、廉价的、可扩展的方法,可能为填补 LTC 患者心理社会关怀的空白提供了一种途径。本文探讨了患有长期疾病的人的心理社会需求,并调查了他们对在线同伴支持干预措施的看法,以告知其未来的设计。

方法

通过共同生产的参与式方法,与患有长期疾病的人进行了在线焦点小组讨论。焦点小组的讨论内容被录音并逐字记录。采用批判性现实主义方法进行反思性主题分析(TA),并采用归纳分析方法,旨在遵循参与者的优先事项和关注点。

结果

共有 10 名患有各种 LTC 的人参加了三个在线焦点小组,每个小组的平均持续时间为 95(±10.1)分钟。参与者的平均年龄为 57(±11.4)岁,60%的参与者为女性。三个主要的主题是:(1)自我与外部世界的关系;(2)过去的同伴支持经验;(3)同伴支持的理念和愿景。患有长期疾病的成年人分享了他们过去的同伴支持经验,并探讨了他们对未来在线同伴支持平台如何满足他们心理社会需求的看法。

结论

尽管长期身体健康状况对心理健康有负面影响,但身体和心理健康护理通常被视为独立的实体。对于患有 LTC 的人来说,需要采用综合方法。在线同伴支持的实施得到了支持,以弥补这一差距,但有一个明确的共识,即这些干预措施需要共同制定,并精心设计,以确保它们安全,不商业化或规定性。对这些在线空间的潜在利益和关注点的共同探讨可以塑造未来平台的理念和愿景。

患者或公众贡献

这项工作是在一个更广泛的项目中进行的,该项目正在为患有 LTC 的人开发一个在线同伴支持平台。参与式、共同生产的方法是这项工作的重要组成部分。最初的愿景是由我们的患者和公众参与(PPI)小组的经验引导的,他们强调了同伴之间互动的治疗价值。焦点小组证实了这个项目的重要性和潜在益处。本文代表了 PPI 成员的观点,他们在心理-生理界面的研究和公众参与方面进行合作。一个由同样患有 LTC 的成员组成的独立的研究咨询小组(RAG)共同制定了研究文件、主题指南,并为关键决策过程提供了信息。最后,我们的共同研究者(E. A. F.)拥有长期疾病的生活经验,与同事一起进行了分析和撰写,进一步加强了我们工作的解释和共鸣。她共同担任第一作者,作为研究团队的核心成员,确保研究的进行牢牢扎根于患有长期疾病的人的生活经验。

相似文献

1
A qualitative exploration of the psychosocial needs of people living with long-term conditions and their perspectives on online peer support.对长期患病者的社会心理需求及其对在线同伴支持看法的定性探索。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):2075-2088. doi: 10.1111/hex.13814. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Interventions to improve the mental health of children and young people with long-term physical conditions: linked evidence syntheses.改善患有长期身体状况的儿童和青少年心理健康的干预措施:综合证据的关联分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 May;23(22):1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta23220.
3
The lived experience of severe mental illness and long-term conditions: a qualitative exploration of service user, carer, and healthcare professional perspectives on self-managing co-existing mental and physical conditions.严重精神疾病和长期疾病的生活体验:服务使用者、照顾者和医疗保健专业人员对自我管理共存的精神和身体状况的观点的定性探索。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04117-5.
4
Investigating the beneficial experiences of online peer support for those affected by alopecia: an interpretative phenomenological analysis using online interviews.探讨脱发患者在线同伴支持的有益经验:运用在线访谈的阐释现象学分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Nov;181(5):992-998. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17998. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
6
Benefits outweigh the risks: a consensus statement on the risks of physical activity for people living with long-term conditions.利大于弊:关于身体活动对患有长期疾病的人风险的共识声明。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;56(8):427-438. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104281. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
7
The Lived Experience of Informal Caregivers of People Who Have Severe Mental Illness and Coexisting Long-Term Conditions: A Qualitative Study.严重精神疾病合并长期共存疾病患者的非正式照护者的生活体验:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14119. doi: 10.1111/hex.14119.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Gaining consensus on emotional wellbeing themes and preferences for digital intervention type and content to support the mental health of young people with long-term health conditions: A Delphi study.就支持患有长期疾病的年轻人心理健康的情绪健康主题和数字干预类型及内容偏好达成共识:一项德尔菲研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14025. doi: 10.1111/hex.14025.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Online Peer Support for Long-Term Conditions: Protocol for a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.长期病症的在线同伴支持:可行性随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 23;14:e71513. doi: 10.2196/71513.
2
A mixed studies systematic review on the health and wellbeing effects, and underlying mechanisms, of online support groups for chronic conditions.一项关于慢性病在线支持小组对健康和幸福的影响及潜在机制的混合研究系统评价。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 15;3(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00217-6.
3
Navigating HOPE (Hypermobile Online Pain managemEnt): Perspectives and Experiences From People With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome or Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder on a Condition-Specific Online Pain Management Programme.探索HOPE(高活动度在线疼痛管理):患有高活动度型埃勒斯-当洛综合征或高活动度谱系障碍的患者对特定疾病在线疼痛管理项目的观点与体验
Health Expect. 2025 Feb;28(1):e70186. doi: 10.1111/hex.70186.

本文引用的文献

1
Special issue on digital health interventions in chronic medical conditions: Editorial.慢性病数字健康干预特刊:编者按
Internet Interv. 2021 Sep 20;28:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100457. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A co-produced framework analysis.服务使用者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对远程心理健康的体验和看法:一个共同制定的框架分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 16;16(9):e0257270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257270. eCollection 2021.
3
Integrated care for people with long-term mental and physical health conditions in low-income and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家中长期身心健康状况患者的综合护理。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;6(2):174-186. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30298-0. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
Qualitative Exploration of the Potential for Adverse Events When Using an Online Peer Support Network for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Survey.使用在线同伴心理健康支持网络时不良事件发生可能性的定性探索:横断面调查
JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Oct 30;4(4):e49. doi: 10.2196/mental.8168.
5
Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.面对面与在线前列腺癌同伴支持小组:一项横断面比较研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Feb;12(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0633-0. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People With Chronic Illness: A Qualitative Systematic Review.慢性病患者日常生活中的在线对等社区:一项定性系统综述
Qual Health Res. 2017 Jan;27(1):89-99. doi: 10.1177/1049732316680203.
7
Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation?成员核对:一种增强可信度的工具还是仅仅是对验证的认可?
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1802-1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
8
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
9
Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.报告定性研究的标准:建议的综合。
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
10
Embedding integrated mental health assessment and management in general hospital settings: feasibility, acceptability and the prevalence of common mental disorder.将综合心理健康评估与管理嵌入综合医院环境:可行性、可接受性及常见精神障碍的患病率
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 May-Jun;36(3):318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 16.