• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对佛罗里达州医疗项目中大麻污染的认知

Patients' Perceptions of Cannabis Contamination in Florida's Medical Program.

作者信息

Spandau Gabriel, Loizzo Jamie, Jury Hannah, Bunch James C, Stedman Nicole, Pearson Brian, Goodin Amie J

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Education and Communication, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2024 Dec 9;8(1):15-30. doi: 10.1159/000542929. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1159/000542929
PMID:39963117
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11832188/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As medical cannabis becomes more accessible, product quality must be evaluated. Researchers identified a social media community where Florida medical cannabis patients discuss personal experiences. The objective of this study was to analyze posts in this community to understand patient experience with products purchased from Florida medical dispensaries they believed to be contamination, perceptions of product quality, and desired changes to the Florida program.

METHODS

Social networking theory acted as the underlying framework, and we employed a qualitative case study design to identify mentions of possible contamination and understand patient perceptions of contamination and the Florida medical cannabis program from the Reddit community . The lead researcher conducted a social media analysis of posts identified as containing discussions relevant to product contamination. Constant comparison methods were used to code data, arrive at themes, and maintain validity and reliability of interpretation of coded themes.

RESULTS

Of 300 post mentions of contamination, 98 posts were identified as relevant following review. Key results were as follows: (1) multiple mentions of possible contamination of products from medical cannabis dispensaries reported by Florida program patients; (2) patients sought second opinions when concerned about possible contamination and shared personal experiences as well as advice on what concerned patients should do if they believe they have contaminated products; (3) some patients expressed feelings of anxiety and worry about health, safety, and quality control, while others that described possible product contamination did not express concern; and (4) patients wanted changes regarding vertical integration, company accountability, state oversight, and home grow law.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical cannabis patients and providers could benefit from education on responding to possible contamination within medical cannabis products. Policymakers should consider these findings when setting regulations around contamination testing thresholds, dispensary oversight, and other regulations that directly impact patient safety, like allowing patients to see products before purchase.

摘要

引言

随着医用大麻越来越容易获得,必须对产品质量进行评估。研究人员发现了一个社交媒体社区,佛罗里达州的医用大麻患者在该社区讨论个人经历。本研究的目的是分析该社区的帖子,以了解患者对从他们认为有污染的佛罗里达州医用药房购买的产品的体验、对产品质量的看法以及对佛罗里达州该项目期望的改变。

方法

社交网络理论作为基础框架,我们采用定性案例研究设计,从Reddit社区识别可能污染的提及内容,并了解患者对污染以及佛罗里达州医用大麻项目的看法。首席研究员对被确定包含与产品污染相关讨论的帖子进行了社交媒体分析。使用持续比较法对数据进行编码、得出主题,并保持编码主题解释的有效性和可靠性。

结果

在300条提及污染的帖子中,经审查确定有98条帖子相关。主要结果如下:(1)佛罗里达州该项目的患者多次提及医用大麻药房产品可能存在污染;(2)患者在担心可能存在污染时会寻求第二意见,并分享个人经历以及关于如果患者认为自己购买到受污染产品应采取什么措施的建议;(3)一些患者表达了对健康、安全和质量控制的焦虑和担忧,而其他描述可能产品污染的患者并未表达担忧;(4)患者希望在垂直整合、公司问责、州监管和家庭种植法律方面有所改变。

结论

医用大麻患者和提供者可从有关应对医用大麻产品可能污染的教育中受益。政策制定者在制定有关污染检测阈值、药房监管以及其他直接影响患者安全的法规(如允许患者在购买前查看产品)时应考虑这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/ddd18293d235/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/6ce83f3a8976/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/f123079867d6/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/373c1f0488b6/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/5ebe9d79a603/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/36f13c798bcc/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/e8d897f9fe4b/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/d4de777b7e05/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/22aac98756e3/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/fe3046c24f8d/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/c2e569a5a28d/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/ddd18293d235/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/6ce83f3a8976/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/f123079867d6/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/373c1f0488b6/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/5ebe9d79a603/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/36f13c798bcc/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/e8d897f9fe4b/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/d4de777b7e05/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/22aac98756e3/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/fe3046c24f8d/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/c2e569a5a28d/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c8/11832188/ddd18293d235/mca-2025-0008-0001-542929_F11.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' Perceptions of Cannabis Contamination in Florida's Medical Program.患者对佛罗里达州医疗项目中大麻污染的认知
Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2024 Dec 9;8(1):15-30. doi: 10.1159/000542929. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Determining the prevalence of cannabis, tobacco, and vaping device mentions in online communities using natural language processing.使用自然语言处理技术确定在线社区中关于大麻、烟草和蒸气设备的提及率。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Nov 1;228:109016. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109016. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Examining Cannabis, Tobacco, and Vaping Discourse on Reddit: An Exploratory Approach Using Natural Language Processing.审视 Reddit 上的大麻、烟草和蒸气电子烟讨论:使用自然语言处理的探索性方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;9:738513. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.738513. eCollection 2021.
4
Using Transformer-Based Topic Modeling to Examine Discussions of Delta-8 Tetrahydrocannabinol: Content Analysis.基于 Transformer 的主题建模在研究 δ-8 四氢大麻酚讨论中的应用:内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 21;25:e49469. doi: 10.2196/49469.
5
Comparison of the Users' Attitudes Toward Cannabidiol on Social Media Platforms: Topic Modeling Study.社交媒体平台上用户对大麻二酚态度的比较:主题建模研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 11;9:e34132. doi: 10.2196/34132.
6
Analysis of social media compliance with cannabis advertising regulations: evidence from recreational dispensaries in Illinois 1-year post-legalization.社交媒体对大麻广告法规的合规性分析:来自伊利诺伊州娱乐性药房合法化一年后的证据。
J Cannabis Res. 2024 Jan 3;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42238-023-00208-6.
7
A qualitative content analysis of cannabis-related discussions on Reddit during the COVID-19 pandemic.对新冠疫情大流行期间 Reddit 上与大麻相关讨论的定性内容分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0304336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304336. eCollection 2024.
8
Legalization of Smokable Medical Cannabis and Changes in the Dispensed Amount of Δ-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol Per Patient.可吸食医用大麻合法化与每位患者Δ-9四氢大麻酚配给量的变化。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2025 Apr;10(2):207-212. doi: 10.1089/can.2024.0073. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
9
Drivers of purchase decisions for cannabis products among consumers in a legalized market: a qualitative study.合法市场中消费者对大麻产品购买决策的驱动因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;22(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12399-9.
10
A Failure to Guide: Patient Experiences within a State-Run Cannabis Program in Pennsylvania, United States.指导失败:美国宾夕法尼亚州国有大麻项目中的患者体验。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(4):516-521. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.2019780. Epub 2021 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts of medical and non-medical cannabis on the health of older adults: Findings from a scoping review of the literature.医用和非医用大麻对老年人健康的影响:文献综述的研究结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 17;18(2):e0281826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281826. eCollection 2023.
2
U.S. Trends in Registration for Medical Cannabis and Reasons for Use From 2016 to 2020 : An Observational Study.2016 年至 2020 年美国医用大麻登记趋势及使用原因:一项观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):945-951. doi: 10.7326/M22-0217. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
3
The use of social media and online communications in times of pandemic COVID-19.
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间社交媒体和在线通信的使用情况。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2021 Aug;22(3):255-260. doi: 10.1177/1751143720966280. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
4
Cannabis Contaminants: Regulating Solvents, Microbes, and Metals in Legal Weed.大麻污染物:规范合法大麻中的溶剂、微生物和金属。
Environ Health Perspect. 2019 Aug;127(8):82001. doi: 10.1289/EHP5785. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Cannabis use, attitudes, and legal status in the U.S.: A review.美国的大麻使用、态度和法律地位:综述。
Prev Med. 2017 Nov;104:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
6
Understanding dabs: contamination concerns of cannabis concentrates and cannabinoid transfer during the act of dabbing.了解滴吸:大麻浓缩物的污染问题以及滴吸过程中的大麻素转移。
J Toxicol Sci. 2015 Dec;40(6):797-803. doi: 10.2131/jts.40.797.
7
European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries.欧洲公民对电子健康服务的使用:七个国家的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Apr 10;7:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-53.