Marcelin Jasmine R, Khazanchi Rohan, Lyden Elizabeth, Cawcutt Kelly A, Abdul-Mutakabbir Jacinda C, Ha David R, Florez Narjust, Kullar Ravina, Ristagno Elizabeth H
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Harvard Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Combined Residency Program at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston Children's Hospital, and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jan 17;12(2):ofaf024. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf024. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Specialty societies, including the Infectious Diseases Society of America, strive to address gender and racial inequities in professional advancement. Microaggressions remain a persistent and pervasive barrier to these goals. Nonprofessional speaker introductions are a manifestation of race- and gender-based microaggressions, which have not been previously assessed at IDWeek. We assessed disparities in speaker introductions at IDWeek over a 7-year period that included formal gender equity initiatives introduced in 2016.
We conducted a retrospective observational study of video-recorded IDWeek speaker introductions from 2013 to 2019. Trained coders reviewed presentation video archives to assess a primary outcome of nonprofessional introductions: when a speaker's professional title was not used as the first introduction. We used descriptive statistics, Fisher exact tests, Cochrane-Armitage trend tests, and multivariable logistic regression to characterize relationships between speaker introductions and presentation year, speaker demographics, and speaker-moderator demographic concordance.
Of 1940 videos reviewed, 48.9% of IDWeek speakers received nonprofessional introductions during and before 2016 vs 41.5% of speakers after 2016 ( = .0013). There was an increasing linear trend in the frequency of professional introductions by speaker age group from 47.1% for age <40 years to 65.3% for age >60 years ( < .0001). White moderators more frequently used nonprofessional introductions than moderators from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (47.7% vs 29.1%, = .0014). Women-men speaker-moderator pairs had more nonprofessional introductions (54.6%, < .001).
In the largest assessment of microaggressions in speaker introductions at a national medical specialty conference, we highlighted some progress over time and ample opportunity to further standardize equitable speaker introductions, especially for women and junior speakers.
包括美国传染病学会在内的专业学会努力解决职业发展中的性别和种族不平等问题。微侵犯仍然是实现这些目标的一个持续且普遍存在的障碍。非专业的演讲者介绍是基于种族和性别的微侵犯的一种表现形式,此前在IDWeek会议上尚未对此进行过评估。我们评估了在包括2016年推出的正式性别平等倡议在内的7年时间里,IDWeek会议上演讲者介绍方面的差异。
我们对2013年至2019年IDWeek会议演讲者介绍的视频记录进行了一项回顾性观察研究。经过培训的编码人员查看了演讲视频档案,以评估非专业介绍的主要结果:即演讲者的专业头衔未被用作首次介绍。我们使用描述性统计、Fisher精确检验、Cochrane-Armitage趋势检验和多变量逻辑回归来描述演讲者介绍与演讲年份、演讲者人口统计学特征以及演讲者-主持人人口统计学一致性之间的关系。
在审查的1940个视频中,2016年及之前有48.9%的IDWeek会议演讲者收到了非专业介绍,而2016年之后这一比例为41.5%(P = 0.0013)。按演讲者年龄组划分,专业介绍的频率呈线性上升趋势,从年龄小于40岁的47.1%升至年龄大于60岁的65.3%(P < 0.0001)。白人主持人比医学领域代表性不足背景的主持人更频繁地使用非专业介绍(47.7%对29.1%,P = 0.0014)。女性-男性演讲者-主持人组合有更多非专业介绍(54.6%,P < 0.001)。
在对全国医学专业会议上演讲者介绍中的微侵犯进行的最大规模评估中,我们强调了随着时间推移取得的一些进展以及进一步规范公平的演讲者介绍的大量机会,特别是针对女性和初级演讲者。