• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GRADE指南40:环境与职业健康的GRADE证据到决策框架

GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health.

作者信息

Senerth Emily, Whaley Paul, Akl Elie, Beverly Brandy, Alonso-Coello Pablo, Rooney Andrew, Schünemann Holger J, Thayer Kristina A, Tsaioun Katya, Morgan Rebecca L

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave NW #2, Washington, DC 20052, USA; Evidence-based Toxicology Collaboration at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Rm: W7032, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Evidence-based Toxicology Collaboration at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Rm: W7032, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2025 Mar;197:109314. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109314. Epub 2025 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2025.109314
PMID:39965475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11930603/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidance for the use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) framework for environmental and occupational health (EOH).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis of published and public EOH decision frameworks, followed by a modified Delphi process leading to development of a draft GRADE EtD framework for EOH. We pilot tested the provisional framework through a virtual workshop series, which further informed guidance for the framework's application. We presented a summary of the results to all attendees of the GRADE Working Group meeting for feedback in July 2022 and November 2022, and for approval in May 2023.

RESULTS

Consistent with existing GRADE EtD frameworks, the EtD framework for EOH includes a scoping and contextualization process and twelve assessment criteria. Modifications to the existing EtD frameworks include: consideration of the socio-political context when making judgments about the priority of the problem and feasibility of different alternatives; the addition of timing when making judgments about benefits and harms, the balance of effects, and feasibility; broadening of the equity criterion to include considerations beyond health equity; and more explicit accommodation of variable or conflicting stakeholder views when considering values and acceptability. The new EtD framework is also accompanied by a user guide intended to support its implementation in the EOH context.

CONCLUSION

Policymakers, regulators, and other stakeholders may use this GRADE EtD framework to approach decision-making about environmental and occupational exposures and interventions.

摘要

目的

为环境与职业健康(EOH)领域使用推荐分级评估、制定与评价(GRADE)证据到决策(EtD)框架提供指导。

研究设计与背景

我们对已发表和公开的EOH决策框架进行了系统回顾和叙述性综合分析,随后通过改进的德尔菲法制定了EOH的GRADE EtD框架草案。我们通过一系列虚拟研讨会对临时框架进行了试点测试,这进一步为框架的应用提供了指导。我们于2022年7月和11月向GRADE工作组会议的所有与会者介绍了结果以征求反馈意见,并于2023年5月征求批准。

结果

与现有的GRADE EtD框架一致,EOH的EtD框架包括一个范围界定和背景化过程以及十二个评估标准。对现有EtD框架的修改包括:在判断问题的优先级和不同替代方案的可行性时考虑社会政治背景;在判断益处和危害、效果平衡及可行性时增加时间因素;将公平标准扩大到包括健康公平之外的考虑因素;以及在考虑价值观和可接受性时更明确地考虑利益相关者的不同或冲突观点。新的EtD框架还附带了一份用户指南,旨在支持其在EOH背景下的实施。

结论

政策制定者、监管机构和其他利益相关者可使用此GRADE EtD框架来进行有关环境和职业暴露及干预措施的决策。

相似文献

1
GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health.GRADE指南40:环境与职业健康的GRADE证据到决策框架
Environ Int. 2025 Mar;197:109314. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109314. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
2
Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study.构建环境与职业健康决策框架的研究:一项系统综述与德尔菲研究
Environ Int. 2025 Jan;195:109209. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109209. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions.卫生系统和公共卫生决策中的 GRADE 证据决策(EtD)框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2.
5
Evidence to decision frameworks enabled structured and explicit development of healthcare recommendations.证据到决策框架有助于医疗保健建议的结构化和明确制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;150:51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
6
[GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical guidelines].[分级:证据到决策(EtD)框架——一种做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。2:临床指南]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Mar;140:63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions.证据决策框架:为环境健康干预措施的决策提供信息的综述与分析。
Environ Health. 2021 Dec 8;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00794-z.
8
Defining decision thresholds for judgments on health benefits and harms using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) evidence to decision (EtD) frameworks: a randomized methodological study (GRADE-THRESHOLD).使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)证据到决策(EtD)框架来确定健康益处和危害判断的决策阈值:一项随机方法学研究(GRADE-THRESHOLD)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Mar;179:111639. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111639. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
9
[GRADE: Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks - a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction].[分级:证据到决策(EtD)框架——一种做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。1:引言]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Jul;134:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
10
Contextualizing evidence-based nurse-led interventions for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions using GRADE evidence to decision framework: A Delphi study.使用 GRADE 证据决策框架将基于证据的护士主导干预措施用于减少 30 天内医院再入院率进行背景化:一项德尔菲研究。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2023 Aug;20(4):315-329. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12650. Epub 2023 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Sugar-free chewing gum's effect on patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of RCTs.无糖口香糖对维持性血液透析患者的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Aug 29;26(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04430-7.
2
Evaluating Hepatokines in the Progression of Non-alcoholic Fatty Acid Liver Disease by Decoding Liver-Derived Molecular Pathologies.通过解码肝脏衍生分子病理学评估非酒精性脂肪酸肝病进展中的肝源细胞因子
Cureus. 2025 May 16;17(5):e84258. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84258. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study.构建环境与职业健康决策框架的研究:一项系统综述与德尔菲研究
Environ Int. 2025 Jan;195:109209. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109209. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
2
Using evidence to decision frameworks led to guidelines of better quality and more credible and transparent recommendations.运用基于证据的决策框架产生了质量更高、建议更可信且更透明的指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;162:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.013. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
3
How we promote rigour in systematic reviews and evidence maps at Environment International.我们如何在《环境国际》的系统评价和证据图谱中提升严谨性。
Environ Int. 2022 Dec;170:107543. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107543. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Towards a framework for systematic reviews of the prevalence of exposure to environmental and occupational risk factors.针对环境和职业风险因素暴露的普遍性进行系统综述的框架。
Environ Health. 2022 Jul 6;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00878-4.
5
How evidence-based methodologies can help identify and reduce uncertainty in chemical risk assessment.循证方法如何有助于识别和减少化学风险评估中的不确定性。
ALTEX. 2022;39(2):175-182. doi: 10.14573/altex.2201131. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
GRADE notes: How to use GRADE when there is "no" evidence? A case study of the expert evidence approach.GRADE 注释:当没有“证据”时如何使用 GRADE?专家证据方法的案例研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.026. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
8
Application of US EPA IRIS systematic review methods to the health effects of phthalates: Lessons learned and path forward.美国环境保护局综合风险信息系统(IRIS)系统评价方法在邻苯二甲酸盐健康影响研究中的应用:经验教训与未来方向
Environ Int. 2020 Dec;145:105820. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105820.
9
Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies.GRADE方法在卫生政策制定与评估中的应用:营养与身体活动政策的范围综述
Implement Sci. 2020 May 24;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00984-2.
10
Systematic evidence maps as a novel tool to support evidence-based decision-making in chemicals policy and risk management.系统证据图谱作为一种新工具,支持化学品政策和风险管理中的循证决策。
Environ Int. 2019 Sep;130:104871. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.065. Epub 2019 Jun 26.