Karimi Maryam, Aslanabadi Arash, Atkinson Ben, Hojabri Mahsa, Munawwar Arshi, Zareidoodeji Roza, Ray Krishanu, Habibzadeh Parham, Parlayan Hanife Nur Karakoc, DeVico Anthony, Heredia Alonso, Abbasi Abdolrahim, Sajadi Mohammad M
Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Infectious Diseases, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.
Acta Biomater. 2025 Mar 15;195:522-535. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.02.035. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
Background Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) effectively treat and prevent various diseases, but their clinical application is hindered by issues related to the route of administration and pharmacokinetics (PK). Intravenous (IV) administration is cumbersome, while subcutaneous (SC) administration is hampered by lower bioavailability and potential for immunogenicity. This study evaluated the efficacy of liposomal formulations in enhancing the subcutaneous (SC) delivery and PK of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) directed against HIV.
mAbs were encapsulated in liposomes with and without PEGylation. The liposomes were characterized for particle size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, and release. Thereafter, mice were injected with free mAbs or liposome-encapsulated mAbs, and PK was evaluated.
Liposomes exhibited sizes of 85-92 nm with negative surface charges. Encapsulation efficiencies were 61 % for PEGylated and 58 % for non-PEGylated liposomes. Stability testing over 16 weeks revealed that formulations remained stable at 4 °C but showed leakage at 37 C. Cytotoxicity assays confirmed that the liposomal formulations did not affect cell viability or induce apoptosis in HMEC-1 cells. In vivo, PK studies in humanized FcRn mice indicated that the PEGylated formulations generally had higher half-life, Cmax, AUC, and MRT, and lower CL values compared to their non-PEGylated formulations of the same injection type. Both liposomal formulations showed improvements in bioavailability and extended half-life compared to free mAbs administered via SC and IV routes. Compared to the gold standard of IV free mAb injection, SC injection of antibodies encapsulated in PEGylated liposome had up to 80 % higher bioavailability and 45 % extension of half-life. Compared to the SC free mAb injection, the differences were even more pronounced, with liposomal SC injection having up to 113 % higher bioavailability and 81 % extension of half-life.
Overall, liposomal encapsulation effectively protected SC injected mAbs from degradation, facilitated sustained release, and improved PK profiles, suggesting a promising strategy for enhancing the therapeutic potential of mAbs in conditions that need repeated injections. Future work should further optimize liposomal formulations to increase loading capacity, stability, and release kinetics.
This study addresses a challenge in the administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Intravenous administration requires additional resources, including nursing staff, making it time-consuming and costly. Although subcutaneous (SC) administration offers a less expensive and more patient-friendly option, it suffers from lower bioavailability and potentially shorter half-life. In this study, we encapsulated mAbs in liposomal formulations specifically designed to enhance their pharmacokinetics by promoting efficient lymphatic transport. Compared with both SC and even IV administration of free antibodies, liposomal formulations of mAbs remarkably improve bioavailability and extend the half-life. This innovative approach combines the comfort of SC administration with enhanced pharmacokinetics, addressing the limitations of current SC delivery methods. Liposomal formulations have the ability to greatly improve SC mAb administration by reducing the amount of antibody needed to be administered, reducing the frequency of injections, and potentially protecting against immunogenicity.
背景 单克隆抗体(mAb)可有效治疗和预防多种疾病,但其临床应用受到给药途径和药代动力学(PK)相关问题的阻碍。静脉注射(IV)给药操作繁琐,而皮下注射(SC)则因生物利用度较低和存在免疫原性风险而受到限制。本研究评估了脂质体制剂在增强针对HIV的广谱中和抗体(bNAb)皮下递送和药代动力学方面的效果。
将单克隆抗体封装于有或没有聚乙二醇化的脂质体中。对脂质体的粒径、多分散指数、zeta电位和释放情况进行表征。此后,给小鼠注射游离单克隆抗体或脂质体包裹的单克隆抗体,并评估药代动力学。
脂质体粒径为85 - 92nm,表面带负电荷。聚乙二醇化脂质体的包封率为61%,非聚乙二醇化脂质体为58%。16周的稳定性测试表明,制剂在4°C下保持稳定,但在37°C时出现渗漏。细胞毒性试验证实,脂质体制剂不影响细胞活力,也不诱导HMEC - 1细胞凋亡。在体内,人源化FcRn小鼠的药代动力学研究表明,与相同注射类型的非聚乙二醇化制剂相比,聚乙二醇化制剂的半衰期、Cmax、AUC和MRT通常更高,CL值更低。与通过皮下和静脉途径给药的游离单克隆抗体相比,两种脂质体制剂的生物利用度均有所提高,半衰期延长。与静脉注射游离单克隆抗体的金标准相比,皮下注射聚乙二醇化脂质体包裹的抗体生物利用度提高高达80%,半衰期延长45%。与皮下注射游离单克隆抗体相比,差异更为显著,脂质体皮下注射生物利用度提高高达113%,半衰期延长81%。
总体而言,脂质体包封有效保护了皮下注射的单克隆抗体不被降解,促进了持续释放,并改善了药代动力学特征,表明在需要重复注射的情况下,这是增强单克隆抗体治疗潜力的一种有前景的策略。未来的工作应进一步优化脂质体制剂,以提高载药量、稳定性和释放动力学。
本研究解决了单克隆抗体(mAb)给药方面的一个挑战。静脉注射需要额外的资源,包括护理人员,既耗时又昂贵。虽然皮下注射(SC)提供了一种成本较低且对患者更友好的选择,但它的生物利用度较低,半衰期可能较短。在本研究中,我们将单克隆抗体封装在专门设计的脂质体制剂中,通过促进有效的淋巴转运来增强其药代动力学。与游离抗体的皮下甚至静脉注射相比,单克隆抗体的脂质体制剂显著提高了生物利用度并延长了半衰期。这种创新方法将皮下注射的便利性与增强的药代动力学相结合,解决了当前皮下给药方法的局限性。脂质体制剂有能力通过减少所需给药抗体的量、降低注射频率并可能预防免疫原性,极大地改善皮下单克隆抗体给药。