Haley Danielle F, Beane Stephanie, Yarbrough Courtney R, Cummings Janet, Linton Sabriya, Ibragimov Umedjon, Haardörfer Regine, Cooper Hannah L F
University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Apr;171:209639. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2025.209639. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
While evidence suggests Medicaid expansion can reduce overdose, some expressed concern expansion fueled the US opioid overdose crisis by increasing access to low-cost prescription opioids diverted for non-prescribed use. Ecologic studies find a protective relationship or no relationship between expansion and area-level opioid prescribing. Little is known about the relationship between expansion and opioid use among people experiencing poverty who inject drugs (PWID), a population at heightened risk of overdose likely to benefit from Medicaid expansion. We examined whether expansion was associated with prescription opioid and benzodiazepine misuse among PWID experiencing poverty and whether associations varied by race/ethnicity and HIV status.
This serial cross-sectional observational study used generalized difference-in-differences models to analyze data (2012, 2015, 2018) from 19,728 PWID aged 18-64 with income ≤138 % of federal poverty line from 13 states in the CDC's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. Outcomes included past 12-month non-injection and injection prescription opioid misuse and benzodiazepine misuse.
The sample (N = 19,728) was 40 % non-Latinx Black persons and 22 % Latinx persons. Past 12-month non-injection prescription opioid misuse was 33 %, injection prescription opioid misuse was 16 %, and benzodiazepine use was 40 %. Across all models, there was no association between expansion and prescription opioid misuse (confidence intervals included 0) or prescription benzodiazepine misuse (confidence intervals included 0). Associations did not vary by race/ethnicity or HIV status.
We found no association between Medicaid expansion and opioid or benzodiazepine misuse overall, by race/ethnicity, or HIV status among a large, geographically diverse sample of PWID. These findings provide empirical evidence that expansion is not associated with prescription opioid or benzodiazepine misuse in a population likely to benefit from expansion.
虽然有证据表明医疗补助扩大计划可减少药物过量,但一些人担心该计划因增加了获取用于非处方用途的低成本处方阿片类药物的机会,从而助长了美国阿片类药物过量危机。生态学研究发现,医疗补助扩大计划与地区层面的阿片类药物处方之间存在保护关系或无关联。对于经历贫困的注射吸毒者(PWID)这一过量用药风险较高且可能从医疗补助扩大计划中受益的人群,扩大计划与阿片类药物使用之间的关系鲜为人知。我们研究了医疗补助扩大计划是否与经历贫困的注射吸毒者中处方阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物滥用有关,以及这种关联是否因种族/族裔和艾滋病毒感染状况而异。
这项系列横断面观察性研究使用广义差分模型分析了来自疾病控制与预防中心国家艾滋病毒行为监测中13个州的19728名年龄在18 - 64岁、收入≤联邦贫困线138%的注射吸毒者(2012年、2015年、2018年)的数据。结局指标包括过去12个月非注射和注射处方阿片类药物滥用以及苯二氮䓬类药物滥用。
样本(N = 19728)中40%为非拉丁裔黑人,22%为拉丁裔。过去12个月非注射处方阿片类药物滥用率为33%,注射处方阿片类药物滥用率为16%,苯二氮䓬类药物使用率为40%。在所有模型中,医疗补助扩大计划与处方阿片类药物滥用(置信区间包含0)或处方苯二氮䓬类药物滥用(置信区间包含0)之间均无关联。关联在种族/族裔或艾滋病毒感染状况方面没有差异。
在一个地域广泛、多样化的大型注射吸毒者样本中,我们发现医疗补助扩大计划与阿片类药物或苯二氮䓬类药物滥用总体上、按种族/族裔或艾滋病毒感染状况均无关联。这些发现提供了实证证据,表明在可能从扩大计划中受益的人群中,扩大计划与处方阿片类药物或苯二氮䓬类药物滥用无关。