Suppr超能文献

Carina™平台在妇科恶性疾病机器人辅助子宫切除术中的初步经验。

Initial experience with the Carina™ platform in robotic-assisted hysterectomy for gynecological malignant disease.

作者信息

Liu Yafen, Zhao Zhao, Xu Penglin, Li Yue, Chang Weizhong, Ji Mei

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1, Jianshe East Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, Henan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2346-2353. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11588-6. Epub 2025 Feb 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a new modular robotic system, the Carina™ Platform (Ronovo Surgical, Shanghai, China), in gynecological surgery.

METHODS

All patients underwent robotic hysterectomies (RH) using the Carina performed by a single gynecologist experienced in laparoscopic and robotic surgery from November to December 2023. Patients were evaluated for estimated blood loss (EBL), intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, conversion rate, as well as console and docking times.

RESULTS

Two separate populations were involved: 10 cervical cancer patients (group 1) and six endometrial cancer patients (group 2). There were no conversions to laparotomies or laparoscopies. The mean docking time was 5.75 ± 2.38 min. The mean console time and mean operative time were 154.60 ± 26.01 min and 211.90 ± 53.65 min in group 1, respectively. The mean console time and mean operative time were 98.67 ± 26.71 min and 153.33 ± 22.77 min in group 2, respectively. The median estimated blood loss for group 1 and group 2 were 30 ml (20, 50) and 20 ml (7.5, 20), respectively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications related to the device were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Our experience allows us to state that the modular Carina Platform is safe and efficient in complex gynecologic surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

researchregistry10353  https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home/registrationdetails/665c1a398a97c302739cce06/.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在评估一种新型模块化机器人系统——Carina™平台(中国上海睿诺伟医疗科技有限公司)在妇科手术中的有效性和安全性。

方法

2023年11月至12月,所有患者均接受了由一名擅长腹腔镜和机器人手术的妇科医生使用Carina机器人进行的机器人子宫切除术(RH)。对患者的估计失血量(EBL)、术中及术后并发症、住院时间、中转率以及控制台操作时间和对接时间进行了评估。

结果

涉及两个不同的人群:10例宫颈癌患者(第1组)和6例子宫内膜癌患者(第2组)。没有转为开腹手术或腹腔镜手术的情况。平均对接时间为5.75±2.38分钟。第1组的平均控制台操作时间和平均手术时间分别为154.60±26.01分钟和211.90±53.65分钟。第2组的平均控制台操作时间和平均手术时间分别为98.67±26.71分钟和153.33±22.77分钟。第1组和第2组的估计失血量中位数分别为30毫升(20,50)和20毫升(7.5,20)。未记录到与该设备相关的术中或术后并发症。

结论

我们的经验表明,模块化的Carina平台在复杂的妇科手术中是安全有效的。

临床试验注册

researchregistry10353 https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home/registrationdetails/665c1a398a97c302739cce06/

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/54ab/11933141/41d9666e0aea/464_2025_11588_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Initial experience with the Carina™ platform in robotic-assisted hysterectomy for gynecological malignant disease.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2346-2353. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11588-6. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Robotics-assisted surgery in gynecology: A single-center experience with the Hugo™ RAS system in India.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241302581. doi: 10.1177/17455057241302581.
4
Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) with a new robotic system. Experience at Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute.
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01127-x. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
On-demand robotic surgery for hysterectomies: A combination of the best of robotic and laparoscopic approach.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251325029. doi: 10.1177/17455057251325029. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
6
Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):588.e1-588.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;24(6):977-983. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0699-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
10
Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):93-96. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0700-6. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Multimodular robotic systems (Hugo RAS and Versius CMR) for pelvic surgery: tasks and perspectives from the bed-side assistant.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):3039-3043. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01718-4. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Versius Robotic Surgical System: First Description of a Clinical Case.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Jan 2;48:82-83. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.019. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Introducing the New Surgical Robot HUGO™ RAS: System Description and Docking Settings for Gynecological Surgery.
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 9;12:898060. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.898060. eCollection 2022.
5
Senhance robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a case series.
Croat Med J. 2022 Apr 30;63(2):197-201. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2022.63.197.
6
Evaluation of Hugo RAS System in Major Urologic Surgery: Our Initial Experience.
J Endourol. 2022 Aug;36(8):1029-1035. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0015. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
8
Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) with a new robotic system. Experience at Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute.
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01127-x. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
9
Interval brain imaging for adults with cerebral glioma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 24;12(12):CD013137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013137.pub2.
10
Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;4(4):CD011422. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011422.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验