• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达芬奇 Xi 或 X 机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术中单助手与双助手机器人手术比较。

Single assistant versus dual assistant robotic surgery for robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using da Vinci Xi or X.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Robotic Surgery Center, Tokyo International Ohori Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2021 Dec;17(6):e2315. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2315. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2315
PMID:34312964
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To verify the usefulness of single assistant robotic surgery (SA-RS) using da Vinci Xi or X performed for total hysterectomy.

METHODS

The SA-RS group (S-group) includes surgeries in which the surgeon performed all surgical operations other than that of the uterine manipulator, while the dual assistant robotic surgery group (D-group) includes surgeries performed by the surgeon with two assistants. In S-group, the forceps and camera were replaced during surgery in cases of a large uterus with limited range of motion of the instrument. A comparative study of patient background, intraoperative and postoperative results and surgery-related cost was performed between the two groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups. On the contrary, S-group showed a significant reduction in preparation time and wound closure time, and a savings of $768.

CONCLUSION

SA-RS for total hysterectomy was possible, which is excellent in terms of cost, esthetics, and manpower.

摘要

背景

为了验证达芬奇 Xi 或 X 单助手机器人手术(SA-RS)在全子宫切除术方面的有效性。

方法

SA-RS 组(S 组)包括手术中除子宫操纵器外所有手术操作均由外科医生完成的手术,而双助手机器人手术组(D 组)则包括由外科医生和两名助手共同完成的手术。在 S 组中,如果子宫较大且器械活动范围有限,则在手术中更换钳子和摄像头。对两组患者的背景、术中及术后结果和手术相关费用进行了比较研究。

结果

两组之间无显著差异。相反,S 组在准备时间和伤口闭合时间上有显著减少,节省了 768 美元。

结论

SA-RS 用于全子宫切除术是可行的,在成本、美观和人力方面都非常出色。

相似文献

1
Single assistant versus dual assistant robotic surgery for robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy using da Vinci Xi or X.达芬奇 Xi 或 X 机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术中单助手与双助手机器人手术比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Dec;17(6):e2315. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2315. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
3
Surgical outcomes of conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.传统腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术的手术结果。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Jun;17(3):e2225. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2225. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
4
Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.机器人子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:一项匹配病例对照研究的结局和成本分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 May;150(1):92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
5
Initial experience and surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted total hysterectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system.达芬奇 SP 手术系统机器人辅助全子宫切除术的初步经验和手术结果。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Apr;17(2):e13298. doi: 10.1111/ases.13298.
6
Does transition from the da Vinci Si to Xi robotic platform impact single-docking technique for robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy?从达芬奇Si机器人平台过渡到Xi机器人平台是否会影响机器人辅助腹腔镜肾输尿管切除术的单对接技术?
BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):990-4. doi: 10.1111/bju.13210. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
7
Comparative study of supracervical hysterectomy between da Vinci SP surgical system and conventional single-site laparoscopy for uterine fibroid: single center experiences.达芬奇 SP 手术系统与传统单孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤子宫切除术的对比研究:单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1421-1427. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01527-9. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
8
Senhance surgical system in benign hysterectomy: A real-world comparative assessment of case times and instrument costs versus da Vinci robotics and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy procedures.森恩希思手术系统在良性子宫切除术中的应用:达芬奇机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术相比,实际案例时间和器械成本的比较评估。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Aug;17(4):e2261. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2261. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
9
Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术患者的长期满意度。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;305(6):1481-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06360-9. Epub 2021 Dec 26.
10
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.妇科手术中的机器人辅助腹腔镜检查
JSLS. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):317-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial experience with the Carina™ platform in robotic-assisted hysterectomy for gynecological malignant disease.Carina™平台在妇科恶性疾病机器人辅助子宫切除术中的初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2346-2353. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11588-6. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Validate robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with four equally-spaced ports without an assistant port.验证无辅助操作孔、四孔等距机器人辅助全腹腔镜子宫切除术。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 27;18(1):55. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01800-x.