• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型机器人系统行机器人根治性子宫切除术(RRH)的可行性。Galaxy Care 腹腔镜研究所的经验。

Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) with a new robotic system. Experience at Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute.

机构信息

Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute, 25A, Karve road, Erandwane, Pune, 411004, India.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01127-x. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-020-01127-x
PMID:32710253
Abstract

The main objective of this study was to assess in a series of 30 patients, the feasibility, oncological safety and efficacy of radical hysterectomy by a new robotic system. Prospective study design. Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute and Multispeciality Hospital. We performed Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in patients from August 2019 through February 2020. All the surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (Puntambekar S). Since August 2019, 30 patients with early cervical cancer/endometrial cancer were selected for radical hysterectomy. All patients were in good general condition with controlled medical comorbidities. The mean operative time was 104 min, with mean total lymph node yield of 24.7. The average blood loss was 60 ml and the hospital stay was 2.1 days, and majority of the patients were catheter free by 1 week. Two patients developed uretero-vaginal fistula on the 8th day of surgery. One was managed with Double J stenting and in the other we did laparoscopic ureteroneocystostomy. Our study has demonstrated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of RRH by the Versius robotic systems.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是在 30 例患者中评估一种新的机器人系统进行根治性子宫切除术的可行性、肿瘤安全性和疗效。前瞻性研究设计。Galaxy Care 腹腔镜研究所和多专科医院。我们在 2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 2 月期间对患者进行了机器人根治性子宫切除术。所有手术均由一名外科医生(Puntambekar S)完成。自 2019 年 8 月以来,我们选择了 30 例早期宫颈癌/子宫内膜癌患者进行根治性子宫切除术。所有患者一般情况良好,合并症得到控制。平均手术时间为 104 分钟,平均总淋巴结产量为 24.7。平均出血量为 60ml,住院时间为 2.1 天,大多数患者在 1 周内无需留置导尿管。有 2 例患者在术后第 8 天发生输尿管阴道瘘。其中 1 例采用双 J 支架治疗,另 1 例采用腹腔镜输尿管-膀胱再吻合术。我们的研究表明,Versius 机器人系统行 RRH 具有可行性、安全性和有效性。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy (RRH) with a new robotic system. Experience at Galaxy Care Laparoscopy Institute.新型机器人系统行机器人根治性子宫切除术(RRH)的可行性。Galaxy Care 腹腔镜研究所的经验。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01127-x. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
2
Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.中国老年宫颈癌患者机器人根治性子宫切除术与腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术的疗效和安全性结果比较
BMC Womens Health. 2018 May 1;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0544-x.
3
Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.微型腹腔镜与机器人根治性子宫切除术加系统盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗早期宫颈癌患者:多中心研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.048. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.与传统腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术相比,机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的手术效果更好。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Nov;27(9):1990-1999. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001101.
5
Robotic Radical Hysterectomy After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Phase II Study.局部晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗后机器人根治性子宫切除术:一项前瞻性II期研究
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.机器人根治性子宫切除术在治疗宫颈癌方面优于腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术和开腹根治性子宫切除术。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 19;13(3):e0193033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193033. eCollection 2018.
7
Perioperative Outcomes of 3-Arm Versus 4-Arm Robotic Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.三臂与四臂机器人宫颈癌根治术中的围手术期结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jul-Aug;25(5):823-831. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
8
Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.宫颈癌患者使用三臂机器人与传统多端口腹腔镜进行机器人根治性子宫切除术的手术结果。
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1222-30. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1222.
9
Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌与开放手术和腹腔镜手术的疗效比较:高质量研究的单独荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(4):e14171. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014171.
10
Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.新辅助化疗后腹腔镜与机器人根治性子宫切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌:病例对照研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;41(1):142-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Initial experience with the Carina™ platform in robotic-assisted hysterectomy for gynecological malignant disease.Carina™平台在妇科恶性疾病机器人辅助子宫切除术中的初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2346-2353. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11588-6. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
2
Feasibility evaluation of the Versius surgical system: robot-assisted hysterectomy for benign and malignant gynaecological lesions.Versius手术系统的可行性评估:机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗良性和恶性妇科病变
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;311(2):355-365. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07655-3. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Proposal of set-up standardization for general surgery procedures with the CMR Versius system, a new robotic platform: our initial experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic surgery in gynecology.妇科机器人手术
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28(2):77-82.
CMR Versius 系统下普外科手术操作设置标准化建议:我们的初步经验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 3;409(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03291-2.
4
The first robotic-assisted hysterectomy below the bikini line with the Dexter robotic system™.首例使用德克斯特机器人系统™在比基尼线以下进行的机器人辅助子宫切除术。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Mar;16(1):87-91. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.1.010.
5
Revolutionizing urology: the advancements and applications of robotic platforms.颠覆泌尿外科领域:机器人平台的进步与应用。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 4;18(1):106. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01758-w.
6
Robotic Surgery in Urology: History from PROBOT to HUGO.机器人外科学在泌尿科的应用:从 PROBOT 到 HUGO 的历史。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;23(16):7104. doi: 10.3390/s23167104.
7
Evaluation of the Versius Robotic System for Infant Surgery-A Study in Piglets of Less than 10 kg Body Weight.用于婴儿手术的Versius机器人系统评估——对体重小于10千克仔猪的研究
Children (Basel). 2023 May 3;10(5):831. doi: 10.3390/children10050831.
8
Safe implementation of surgical innovation: a prospective registry of the Versius Robotic Surgical System.手术创新的安全实施:Versius机器人手术系统的前瞻性注册研究
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Feb 27;5(1):e000144. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000144. eCollection 2023.
9
Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.基于国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018年新分期系统比较机器人辅助根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的肿瘤学结局:一项多中心回顾性研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 30;12:879569. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.879569. eCollection 2022.
10
Assessment of the Versius Robotic Surgical System in Minimal Access Surgery: A Systematic Review.微型腹腔镜手术中Versius机器人手术系统的评估:一项系统综述。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 28;11(13):3754. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133754.