Wu Hong-Lei, Wu Yue-Hong, Shen Wang-Qin, Shi Jia-Hai, Xu Yang-Hui, Shen Hong-Wu, Ding Lei, Zhu Yan-Ping, Lan Mei-Juan
Nursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
College of Nursing, Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, 230012, Anhui, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85355-x.
It is essential for clinicians to select the appropriate endotracheal tube to ensure effective airway management. However, an unmatched endotracheal tube cuff area to the airway area can lead to air or secretion leakage, even at the recommended cuff pressure of 20-30 cmHO. The present multicenter prospective observational study aimed to determine the relationship between the difference in cuff area and airway area with the minimum cuff pressure to avoid airway leakage. Adult patients who underwent mechanical ventilation were assigned into three groups, with a minimum cuff pressure of < 20, 20-30, and > 30 cmHO, respectively, in order to have adequate airway sealing. The primary outcome was the difference between the endotracheal tube cuff area and airway area (cuff-airway area difference) that was calculated for the three groups. A total of 284 patients were included, with the mean age of 65.19 (± 14.03) years old. There were 166, 63 and 55 patients who required a minimum cuff pressure of < 20, 20-30 and > 30 cmHO, respectively. The mean cuff-airway area difference was 236.00 ± 85.26, 149.70 ± 48.34 and - 12.29 ± 113.0 mm in the < 20, 20-30, and > 30 cmHO groups, respectively. In addition, the simple linear regression analysis revealed a negative linear relationship between the cuff-airway area difference and minimum cuff pressure (Y = -0.1266 × X + 46.50, F = 571.40, p < 0.001). It can be concluded that a significant number of patients require a cuff pressure out of the recommended range (< 20 or > 30 mmHO) to have adequate airway sealing. Patients with a lower cuff-airway area difference require a higher minimum cuff pressure to seal the airway.
临床医生选择合适的气管内导管以确保有效的气道管理至关重要。然而,即使在推荐的20 - 30 cmHO的套囊压力下,气管内导管套囊面积与气道面积不匹配也可能导致空气或分泌物泄漏。本多中心前瞻性观察研究旨在确定套囊面积与气道面积的差异与避免气道泄漏的最小套囊压力之间的关系。接受机械通气的成年患者被分为三组,为了实现充分的气道密封,其最小套囊压力分别为<20、20 - 30和>30 cmHO。主要结局是计算三组的气管内导管套囊面积与气道面积之差(套囊 - 气道面积差)。共纳入284例患者,平均年龄为65.19(±14.03)岁。分别有166例、63例和55例患者的最小套囊压力<20、20 - 30和>30 cmHO。<20、20 - 30和>30 cmHO组的平均套囊 - 气道面积差分别为236.00±85.26、149.70±48.34和 - 12.29±113.0 mm。此外,简单线性回归分析显示套囊 - 气道面积差与最小套囊压力之间呈负线性关系(Y = -0.1266×X + 46.50,F = 571.40,p < 0.001)。可以得出结论,相当数量的患者需要超出推荐范围(<20或>30 mmHO)的套囊压力才能实现充分的气道密封。套囊 - 气道面积差较小的患者需要更高的最小套囊压力来密封气道。