Nursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Nursing Department, The People's Hospital of Rugao, and Affiliated Rugao Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong City, Jiangsu, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 14;103(24):e38326. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038326.
The present study aims to determine the impact of different cuff diameters on the cuff pressure of endotracheal tubes (ETTs) when the trachea is adequately sealed.
In the present single-center clinical trial, adult patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery were assigned to use ETTs from 2 brands (GME and GZW). The primary endpoint comprised of the following: cuff diameter, inner diameter of the ETT, manufacturer, and the number of subjects with tracheal leakage when the cuff pressure was 30 cm H2O.
A total of 298 patients were assigned into 2 groups, based on the 2 distinct brands of ETTs: experimental group (n = 122, GME brand) and control group (n = 176, GZW brand). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. However, the cuff diameter was significantly smaller in the control group, when compared to the experimental group (P = .001), and the incidence of tracheal leakage was significantly higher in the control group (P = .001). Furthermore, the GME brand ETT had a significantly larger cuff diameter, when compared to the GZW brand ETT.
The cuff size would mismatch the tracheal area in clinical practice. Therefore, chest computed tomography is recommended to routinely evaluate the tracheal cross-sectional area during anesthesia, in order to ensure the appropriate cuff size selection.
本研究旨在确定在气管充分密封的情况下,不同袖口直径对气管内导管(ETT)袖口压力的影响。
在这项单中心临床试验中,接受心胸外科手术的成年患者被分配使用来自 2 个品牌(GME 和 GZW)的 ETT。主要终点包括以下内容:袖口直径、ETT 内径、制造商以及当袖口压力为 30cmH2O 时发生气管泄漏的受试者数量。
根据 ETT 的 2 个不同品牌,将 298 名患者分为 2 组:实验组(n=122,GME 品牌)和对照组(n=176,GZW 品牌)。两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。然而,与实验组相比,对照组的袖口直径明显较小(P=0.001),对照组的气管泄漏发生率明显较高(P=0.001)。此外,GME 品牌 ETT 的袖口直径明显大于 GZW 品牌 ETT。
在临床实践中,袖口尺寸与气管区域不匹配。因此,建议在麻醉期间常规使用胸部计算机断层扫描来评估气管的横截面积,以确保选择合适的袖口尺寸。