• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于估计患者报告结局中个体内有意义变化阈值的加权预测建模方法。

A weighted predictive modeling method for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-individual change for patient-reported outcomes.

作者信息

Zhao Chong-Ye, Yan Min-Qian, Xu Xiao-Han, Ou Chun-Quan

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03924-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-025-03924-z
PMID:39969677
Abstract

PURPOSE

Calculating the threshold for meaningful within-individual change (MWIC) is essential for interpreting patient-reported outcomes (PRO). However, traditional methods of determining MWIC threshold yield varying estimates and lack a standardized approach. We aim to propose a novel method for more accurate MWIC threshold estimation.

METHODS

We developed a weighted predictive modeling method. The weighting involved using the rank difference between PRO score change and the anchor of each individual. A Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to compare the performance of the new method and that of existing state-of-the-art methods. Simulation parameters included distributions of PRO score changes, sample sizes, improvement proportions, and correlation strengths. Statistical performance was assessed using relative bias (rbias), coefficient of variation (CV), and relative root mean squared error (rRMSE).

RESULTS

Distribution-based methods had the largest rbias and rRMSE among all methods. Existing anchor-based methods except for the Terluin 2022 method were biased when the correlation strength was weak or when the improvement proportion was not 50%. The Terluin 2022 method requires estimating an important reliability parameter, and this method had highest CV compared to other predictive modeling methods. The new weighted method demonstrated the smallest rRMSE across most simulation settings. It also maintained relatively high accuracy under weak correlation strength or imbalanced improvement proportion. Similar results were presented under normal or skewed distributions of PRO score changes.

CONCLUSION

This novel method offers a simple and feasible alternative to existing predictive modeling methods for estimating MWIC threshold, which can facilitate the application of PRO.

摘要

目的

计算有意义的个体内变化(MWIC)阈值对于解释患者报告结局(PRO)至关重要。然而,传统的确定MWIC阈值的方法会产生不同的估计值,且缺乏标准化方法。我们旨在提出一种更准确地估计MWIC阈值的新方法。

方法

我们开发了一种加权预测建模方法。加权涉及使用PRO评分变化与每个个体的锚定指标之间的秩差。进行了蒙特卡罗模拟,以比较新方法与现有最先进方法的性能。模拟参数包括PRO评分变化的分布、样本量、改善比例和相关强度。使用相对偏差(rbias)、变异系数(CV)和相对均方根误差(rRMSE)评估统计性能。

结果

在所有方法中,基于分布的方法具有最大的rbias和rRMSE。当相关强度较弱或改善比例不是50%时,除Terluin 2022方法外的现有基于锚定指标的方法存在偏差。Terluin 2022方法需要估计一个重要的可靠性参数,与其他预测建模方法相比,该方法的CV最高。新的加权方法在大多数模拟设置中表现出最小的rRMSE。在弱相关强度或改善比例不均衡的情况下,它也保持了相对较高的准确性。在PRO评分变化的正态或偏态分布下也呈现出类似结果。

结论

这种新方法为估计MWIC阈值提供了一种简单可行的替代现有预测建模方法的方法,有助于PRO的应用。

相似文献

1
A weighted predictive modeling method for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-individual change for patient-reported outcomes.一种用于估计患者报告结局中个体内有意义变化阈值的加权预测建模方法。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03924-z.
2
Establishing thresholds for meaningful within-individual change using longitudinal item response theory.使用纵向项目反应理论建立有意义的个体内变化的阈值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1267-1276. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03172-5. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
3
Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions.基于锚定的方法在不同联合分布特征条件下模拟 PROMIS PF 20a 数据估计有意义的患者内变化阈值的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1277-1293. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03285-x. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
4
An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to establish thresholds of within-individual meaningful change on a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale score in atopic dermatitis.采用解释性序贯混合方法设计,确定特应性皮炎患者睡眠障碍数字评分量表评分的个体内有意义变化的阈值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):881-893. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03294-w. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
5
How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold.用于估计群组和个体水平有意义变化的锚应该有多强?一项模拟研究评估了锚相关性强度,以及样本量、变化分数分布和方法对建立真实有意义变化阈值的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1255-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03286-w. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
6
What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 Among Patients Who Undergo Periacetabular Osteotomy?对于接受髋臼周围截骨术的患者,改良Harris髋关节评分和国际髋关节结果工具12的最小临床重要差异、显著临床益处及患者可接受的症状状态阈值分别是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003393.
7
Establishing clinically meaningful within-individual improvement thresholds for eight patient-reported outcome measures in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.确立复发缓解型多发性硬化患者 8 项患者报告结局测量指标的临床有意义个体内改善阈值。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Jul 4;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00594-8.
8
Effect of present state bias on minimal important change estimates: a simulation study.现状偏差对最小重要变化估计值的影响:一项模拟研究。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2963-2973. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03763-4. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
9
What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?常见骨科手术的临床获益有哪些?与其他经过验证的结局评估工具相比,PROMIS 评估如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Sep 1;480(9):1672-1681. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002241. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Estimating meaningful thresholds for multi-item questionnaires using item response theory.使用项目反应理论估计多项目问卷的有意义阈值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jun;32(6):1819-1830. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03355-8. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating anchor-based minimal important change using longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis.采用纵向验证性因子分析估计基于锚点的最小重要变化量。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Apr;33(4):963-973. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03577-w. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
2
Analysis of patient-reported outcomes in the approval of novel oncology drugs in the United States, 2017-2022.2017 - 2022年美国新型肿瘤药物获批中患者报告结局的分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Apr 6;59:101953. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101953. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Introduction to the special section: "Methodologies and considerations for meaningful change".
特刊介绍:“实现有意义变革的方法与考量”
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1223-1230. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03413-1.
4
How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold.用于估计群组和个体水平有意义变化的锚应该有多强?一项模拟研究评估了锚相关性强度,以及样本量、变化分数分布和方法对建立真实有意义变化阈值的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1255-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03286-w. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
5
The challenges inherent with anchor-based approaches to the interpretation of important change in clinical outcome assessments.基于锚定的方法在解释临床结局评估中重要变化时所固有的挑战。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03297-7. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions.基于锚定的方法在不同联合分布特征条件下模拟 PROMIS PF 20a 数据估计有意义的患者内变化阈值的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1277-1293. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03285-x. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
7
Establishing thresholds for meaningful within-individual change using longitudinal item response theory.使用纵向项目反应理论建立有意义的个体内变化的阈值。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1267-1276. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03172-5. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
8
Improved adjusted minimal important change took reliability of transition ratings into account.改进的调整后最小重要变化考虑了转换评分的可靠性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
9
The importance of patient-reported outcomes and measures.患者报告的结局和测量指标的重要性。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Nov;9(11):1218-1220. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00436-7. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
10
How Vital Are Patient-Reported Outcomes?患者报告的结果有多重要?
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Mar 8;114(3):347-348. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab178.