Samsouris Christos, Papadopoulou Konstantina A, Badcock Nicholas A, Vlachos Filippos, Phylactou Phivos, Papadatou-Pastou Marietta
Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
School of Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Feb;61(4):e70013. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70013.
Cerebral lateralization of written language, much like oral language, is predominantly left lateralized. However, handwriting has been the primary focus in lateralization studies. The cerebral lateralization of typing-a widely used method of writing-remains unexamined. This preregistered study aimed to explore the cerebral lateralization of typing versus handwriting and to investigate possible handedness-related differences. We hypothesized that (i) cerebral lateralization would not differ between the two writing methods after movement correction and (ii) both handwriting and typing would show weaker lateralization in left-handers compared to right-handers. To investigate this, we used functional transcranial Doppler (fTCD) ultrasound, a reliable method for assessing cerebral lateralization during language tasks that remains unaffected by movement artifacts, such as those generated by handwriting and typing. A total of 24 left-handers and 30 right-handers participated, performing written word generation through both handwriting and typing on a computer keyboard while undergoing fTCD assessment. We applied a Bayesian framework for our analysis, as it enables us to demonstrate the absence of a difference (i.e., no difference between two variables), which is not possible with the use of p values (estimated under the frequentist framework). Our results provided evidence supporting the absence of a difference in cerebral lateralization between handwriting and typing after movement correction. However, we found no conclusive evidence to either support or refute a difference in lateralization between left-handers and right-handers, suggesting that more research is needed to clarify the role of handedness in cerebral lateralization for different writing methods.
书面语言的大脑半球侧化,与口头语言非常相似,主要是左半球侧化。然而,手写一直是半球侧化研究的主要焦点。打字(一种广泛使用的书写方式)的大脑半球侧化情况仍未得到研究。这项预先注册的研究旨在探讨打字与手写的大脑半球侧化情况,并调查可能存在的与利手相关的差异。我们假设:(i)在进行运动校正后,两种书写方式的大脑半球侧化情况不会有差异;(ii)与右利手者相比,左利手者的手写和打字的半球侧化程度都会较弱。为了研究这一点,我们使用了功能性经颅多普勒(fTCD)超声,这是一种在语言任务期间评估大脑半球侧化的可靠方法,不受诸如手写和打字产生的运动伪影的影响。共有24名左利手者和30名右利手者参与,他们在接受fTCD评估时,通过手写和在电脑键盘上打字来进行书面单词生成。我们在分析中应用了贝叶斯框架,因为它能让我们证明不存在差异(即两个变量之间没有差异),而使用p值(在频率主义框架下估计)则无法做到这一点。我们的结果提供了证据,支持在进行运动校正后,手写和打字的大脑半球侧化没有差异。然而,我们没有找到确凿的证据来支持或反驳左利手者和右利手者在半球侧化上存在差异,这表明需要更多的研究来阐明利手在不同书写方式的大脑半球侧化中的作用。