da Silva Manoel Gustavo Paranhos, Ítavo Luís Carlos Vinhas, Ítavo Camila Celeste Brandão Ferreira, de Nadai Bonin Gomes Marina, Teixeira Priscilla Dutra, Arcanjo Angelo Herbet Moreira, da Costa Gomes Rodrigo
Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária E Zootecnia (FAMEZ), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso Do Sul (UFMS), Av. Senador Filinto Müller, 2443. Cidade Universitária, Campo Grande, MS, 79070‑900, Brazil.
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais, EPAMIG Oeste, Campo Experimental de Sertãozinho, Patos de Minas-MG, Brazil.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 Feb 20;57(2):73. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04302-0.
Non-protein nitrogen (NPN) sources can replace true protein sources in ruminant diets. This strategy can reduce production costs and improve the economics and productivity of production systems. We hypothesized that genetic group and non-protein nitrogen sources in the diet would not affect the intake and performance of cull heifers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of genetic group and non-protein nitrogen sources added to the total ration on the productive and economic performance of Angus × Nellore (A × N) and Charolais × Nellore (C × N) cull heifers finished in feedlot. A total of 552 crossbred beef heifers with an initial weight of 374.23 ± 55 kg and 24.0 ± 2 months of age were used. The data were analyzed considering a 2 × 2 factorial scheme (2 genetic groups and 2 diets). The diets had the same protein and energy levels, however, with different sources of non-protein nitrogen (NPN). The first diet (LPU) contained livestock urea and protected urea, while the second diet (EU) contained only extruded urea as a source of NPN. There was no significant interaction between genetic group and diet on nutrient intake and most of the productive performance variables (P > 0.05). However, A × N heifers showed greater dry matter intake (10.33 vs. 9.92 kg/day), average daily gain (1.29 vs. 1.15 kg/day) and heavier carcass (305.73 vs. 279.8 kg) compared to C × N heifers (P < 0.01). Heifers fed the LPU diet had higher final weights (500.04 vs. 488.56 kg), average daily gain (1.31 vs. 1.21 kg) and feed efficiency (0.13 vs. 0.12) (P < 0.01). Greater revenue was observed in A × N heifers (US$ 1,244.30 vs. US$ 1,151.64), which despite the greater total cost (US$ 307.13/animal vs. US$ 295.09), had a greater gross margin (US$ 209.38 vs. US$ 136.09), in relation to C × N heifers (P < 0.05). A × N heifers had greater nutrient intake and were more efficient in feed conversion compared to C × N heifers. The inclusion of fast and slow soluble non-protein nitrogen sources in the diet of beef heifers provides greater performance during finishing in feedlots.
非蛋白氮(NPN)来源可替代反刍动物日粮中的真蛋白来源。这一策略能够降低生产成本,提高生产系统的经济性和生产力。我们假设日粮中的遗传群体和非蛋白氮来源不会影响淘汰小母牛的采食量和生产性能。本研究的目的是评估遗传群体和添加到全价日粮中的非蛋白氮来源对在饲养场育肥的安格斯×内洛尔(A×N)和夏洛莱×内洛尔(C×N)淘汰小母牛的生产性能和经济效益的影响。总共使用了552头杂交肉牛小母牛,初始体重为374.23±55千克,年龄为24.0±2个月。数据采用2×2析因设计方案(2个遗传群体和2种日粮)进行分析。两种日粮的蛋白质和能量水平相同,但非蛋白氮(NPN)来源不同。第一种日粮(LPU)包含家畜尿素和包被尿素,而第二种日粮(EU)仅包含挤压尿素作为NPN来源。遗传群体和日粮之间在养分摄入量和大多数生产性能变量上没有显著交互作用(P>0.05)。然而,与C×N小母牛相比,A×N小母牛表现出更高的干物质摄入量(10.33对9.92千克/天)、平均日增重(1.29对1.15千克/天)和更重的胴体(305.73对279.8千克)(P<0.01)。饲喂LPU日粮的小母牛最终体重更高(500.04对488.56千克)、平均日增重更高(1.31对1.21千克)和饲料效率更高(0.13对0.12)(P<0.01)。与C×N小母牛相比,A×N小母牛的收益更高(1244.30美元对1151.64美元),尽管总成本更高(每头动物307.13美元对295.09美元),但其毛利润更高(209.38美元对136.09美元)(P<0.05)。与C×N小母牛相比,A×N小母牛的养分摄入量更高,饲料转化效率更高。在肉牛小母牛的日粮中添加快速和慢速溶解的非蛋白氮来源可在饲养场育肥期间提供更好的生产性能。