• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非归属医疗保险受益人群转移至ACO参与度更高地区后的支出变化。

Spending Changes After Moving to Areas With Greater ACO Participation Among Nonattributed Medicare Beneficiaries.

作者信息

Hou Yucheng, Domino Marisa Elena, Lewis Valerie A, Gong Qing, Callison Kevin, Trogdon Justin G

机构信息

Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston.

Center for Health Information and Research, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2458311. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58311.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58311
PMID:39976969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11843370/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Accountable care organizations (ACOs) under the Medicare Shared Savings Program have long been envisioned as a pathway to improved care efficiency and quality of care for all Medicare beneficiaries. However, little is known about whether the changes in health care spending associated with ACOs have extended beyond ACO-attributed Medicare beneficiaries to all Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate spending changes by non-ACO-attributed Medicare beneficiaries after moving to geographic areas with greater ACO participation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This repeated cross-sectional study analyzed claims from a 20% representative sample of all Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65 to 99 years, from 2009 to 2017. The sample consisted of Medicare beneficiaries who were never attributed to an ACO and moved once across hospital service areas (HSAs) during the study period (movers) and was supplemented by a 20% random sample of beneficiaries who never moved (nonmovers). Data analysis took place from November 2022 to October 2024.

EXPOSURE

Changes in the ACO market penetration rate triggered by nonattributed Medicare beneficiaries moving across HSAs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Annual standardized Medicare spending per beneficiary on acute inpatient, outpatient facility, physician services, and total acute care as well as on hospital outpatient department, evaluation and management, and nonadmitted emergency department visits.

RESULTS

The estimation sample included 62 618 movers (388 263 beneficiary-years; mean [SD] age, 75 [7] years; 134 503 [65%] female-years) and 433 298 nonmovers (2 066 404 beneficiary-years; mean [SD] age, 76 [8] years; 1 273 154 [62%] female-years). In the base model, moving into a market with a 1-SD higher ACO penetration was associated with a 5.8% (95% CI, 4.1%-7.4%) decrease in spending on outpatient facilities and with a 1.6% (95% CI, 0.9% to 2.2%) increase in spending on physician services. Limited changes in total spending on acute inpatient and total acute care were found. These estimated changes were robust to controlling for a rich set of patient- and market-level characteristics and origin-destination HSA combinations.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study provided novel evidence of market-level ACO spillovers to non-ACO-attributed Medicare beneficiaries. Although no substantial ACO spillovers in total acute care spending occurred, the substitution in spending on outpatient facility and physician services suggested that outpatient care may shift away from higher-cost facility settings for all Medicare beneficiaries in markets with greater ACO penetration.

摘要

重要性

长期以来,医疗保险共同储蓄计划下的 accountable care organizations(ACO)一直被视为提高所有医疗保险受益人的医疗效率和医疗质量的途径。然而,对于与 ACO 相关的医疗保健支出变化是否已从 ACO 所属的医疗保险受益人扩展到所有医疗保险受益人,人们知之甚少。

目的

估计非 ACO 所属的医疗保险受益人在迁移到 ACO 参与度更高的地理区域后的支出变化。

设计、设置和参与者:这项重复横断面研究分析了 2009 年至 2017 年所有 65 至 99 岁医疗保险受益人的 20%代表性样本的索赔数据。样本包括在研究期间从未被归为 ACO 且曾在医院服务区(HSA)之间迁移一次的医疗保险受益人(迁移者),并补充了 20%从未迁移的受益人的随机样本(非迁移者)。数据分析于 2022 年 11 月至 2024 年 10 月进行。

暴露因素

非所属医疗保险受益人跨 HSA 迁移引发的 ACO 市场渗透率变化。

主要结局和测量指标

每位受益人在急性住院、门诊设施、医生服务以及总急性护理方面的年度标准化医疗保险支出,以及在医院门诊部、评估和管理以及未住院急诊科就诊方面的支出。

结果

估计样本包括 62618 名迁移者(388263 受益人年;平均[标准差]年龄,75[7]岁;134503[65%]女性年)和 433298 名非迁移者(2066404 受益人年;平均[标准差]年龄,76[8]岁;1273154[62%]女性年)。在基础模型中,迁移到 ACO 渗透率高出 1 个标准差的市场与门诊设施支出下降 5.8%(95%CI,4.1%-7.4%)以及医生服务支出增加 1.6%(95%CI,0.9%至 2.2%)相关。在急性住院和总急性护理的总支出方面发现变化有限。这些估计变化在控制了丰富的患者和市场层面特征以及出发地 - 目的地 HSA 组合后是稳健的。

结论和相关性

本研究提供了市场层面 ACO 对非 ACO 所属医疗保险受益人产生溢出效应的新证据。尽管在总急性护理支出方面没有出现实质性的 ACO 溢出效应,但门诊设施和医生服务支出的替代表明,在 ACO 渗透率更高的市场中,所有医疗保险受益人的门诊护理可能会从成本更高的设施环境中转移出来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b70/11843370/902678c9544e/jamanetwopen-e2458311-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b70/11843370/d1385b8ca46f/jamanetwopen-e2458311-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b70/11843370/e3fea287f3a3/jamanetwopen-e2458311-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b70/11843370/902678c9544e/jamanetwopen-e2458311-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b70/11843370/d1385b8ca46f/jamanetwopen-e2458311-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b70/11843370/e3fea287f3a3/jamanetwopen-e2458311-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b70/11843370/902678c9544e/jamanetwopen-e2458311-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Spending Changes After Moving to Areas With Greater ACO Participation Among Nonattributed Medicare Beneficiaries.非归属医疗保险受益人群转移至ACO参与度更高地区后的支出变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2458311. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58311.
2
Federally Qualified Health Centers and Performance of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations.合格的联邦健康中心与医疗保险责任制医疗组织的绩效。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2445536. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45536.
3
Savings Associated With Bundled Payments for Outpatient Spine Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人门诊脊柱手术捆绑支付相关的节省费用情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251907. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1907.
4
Physician and Hospital Performance in Medicare's Updated Bundled-Payment Model for Joint Replacement.医疗保险联合置换更新捆绑支付模式下的医生与医院绩效
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251930. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1930.
5
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Telehealth Infrastructure, Accountable Care Organization, and Medicare Payment for Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia Living in Socially Vulnerable Areas.远程医疗基础设施、 accountable care organization(可译为“责任医疗组织”)以及对居住在社会弱势群体地区的阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症患者的医疗保险支付。
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Aug;30(8):2148-2156. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0119. Epub 2024 May 16.
7
Supplemental Oxygen Use, Outcomes, and Spending in Patients With COPD in the Medicare Competitive Bidding Program.医疗保险竞争性投标计划中慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的补充氧气使用、治疗结果及费用支出
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Dec 1;184(12):1457-1465. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5738.
8
The Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Model and Health Care Spending, Service Use, and Quality.《综合初级保健加模式与医疗保健支出、服务利用和质量》
JAMA. 2024 Jan 9;331(2):132-146. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24712.
9
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.仅协调的双重资格特殊需求计划中的医疗补助支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.
10
High-risk care management impact on Medicaid ACO utilization and spending.高风险护理管理对医疗补助 accountable care organization(ACO)利用率和支出的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2025 Jul;31(7):334-339. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2025.89766.

本文引用的文献

1
Access, Utilization, and Quality of Behavioral Health Integration in Medicaid Managed Care.医疗补助管理式医疗中的行为健康整合的获取、利用和质量。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e234593. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4593.
2
Estimated Savings From the Medicare Shared Savings Program.医疗保险共享储蓄计划的节省估计。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e234449. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4449.
3
A Decade of ACOs in Medicare: Have They Delivered on Their Promise?医疗保险中负责医疗服务的组织十年:它们兑现承诺了吗?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2023 Feb 1;48(1):63-92. doi: 10.1215/03616878-10171090.
4
Drug Diffusion Through Peer Networks: The Influence of Industry Payments.药物在同行网络中的传播:行业支付的影响。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2022 May;14(2):1-33. doi: 10.1257/pol.20200044.
5
Estimates of ACO savings in the presence of provider and beneficiary selection.存在提供者和受益人选择时的 ACO 节省估计。
Healthc (Amst). 2021 Mar;9(1):100460. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100460. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
6
The persistence of medicare advantage spillovers in the post-Affordable Care Act era.平价医疗法案后时代下医疗保险优势外溢的持续存在。
Health Econ. 2021 Feb;30(2):311-327. doi: 10.1002/hec.4199. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
7
Understanding Medicare ACO Adoption in the Context of Market Factors.理解市场因素背景下的医疗保险 ACO 采用
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Jun;24(3):360-368. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0060. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
Randomized trial shows healthcare payment reform has equal-sized spillover effects on patients not targeted by reform.随机试验表明,医疗保健支付改革对未被改革针对的患者产生了同等规模的溢出效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):18939-18947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004759117. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Savings or Selection? Initial Spending Reductions in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Considerations for Reform.储蓄还是选择?医疗保险共享储蓄计划中的初始支出削减及其改革考虑。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):847-907. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12468. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
10
Alternative Payment Models-Victims of Their Own Success?替代支付模式——自身成功的受害者?
JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):237-238. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4133.