Suppr超能文献

不同制作流程所制造的可摘局部义齿支架部件的就位相关适应性和变形情况。

Seating-related adaptation and deformation of components of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by different workflows.

作者信息

Abduo Assoc Prof Jaafar, Ibrahim Hadeel, Barazanchi Abdullah

机构信息

Associate Professor in Prosthodontics, Convenor of Doctor of Clinical Dentistry (Prosthodontics) and Postgraduate Diploma in Clinical Dentistry (Implants), Melbourne Dental School, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Clinical Lecturer in Prosthodontics and Convenor of Removable Prosthodontics, Melbourne Dental School, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Apr;133(4):1080.e1-1080.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.003. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks have traditionally been produced by conventional impression making and casting. Due to the popularity of intraoral scanning (IOS) and digital manufacturing, RPD frameworks can be produced by alternative workflows.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the seating-related adaptation and deformation of components of RPD frameworks fabricated by different workflows.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A partially edentulous mandibular arch was used as the master model. Three RPD framework manufacturing workflows were evaluated: the conventional impression making and casting (Imp-Cast) group, conventional impression making and digital fabrication by selective laser melting (Imp-SLM) group, and IOS and digital fabrication (IOS-SLM) group. According to each workflow, 10 frameworks were produced. The virtual superimposition of seated and unseated frameworks was executed to determine component adaptation (retentive arm, reciprocating arm, and occlusal rest) and component deformation (retentive arm and framework body). The 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to determine the differences among the groups (α=.05).

RESULTS

No difference in component adaptation was observed for Imp-Cast and Imp-SLM (P>.05), and both were better than IOS-SLM (P<.001). The least retentive arm deformation was observed for Imp-SLM. Imp-Cast and Imp-SLM showed no difference in framework body deformation (P=.92), and both were better than IOS-SLM (P<.05). The IOS-SLM frameworks appeared narrower than the master model.

CONCLUSIONS

Frameworks fabricated from conventional casts exhibited comparable adaptation of components. In some comparisons, SLM fabrication was associated with less deformation than casting. Frameworks fabricated from IOS had the greatest adaptation error and deformation. As all the frameworks were seated on the master model without adjustment, the clinical relevance of this study's finding is yet to be determined.

摘要

问题陈述

可摘局部义齿(RPD)支架传统上是通过传统印模制作和铸造来生产的。由于口内扫描(IOS)和数字制造的普及,RPD支架可以通过替代工作流程来生产。

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估通过不同工作流程制作的RPD支架部件与就位相关的适合性和变形情况。

材料与方法

使用部分牙列缺失的下颌弓作为主模型。评估了三种RPD支架制造工作流程:传统印模制作和铸造(印模 - 铸造,Imp-Cast)组、传统印模制作和选择性激光熔化数字制造(印模 - 选择性激光熔化,Imp-SLM)组以及IOS和数字制造(IOS - 选择性激光熔化,IOS-SLM)组。根据每个工作流程制作10个支架。对就位和未就位支架进行虚拟叠加,以确定部件适合性(固位臂、对抗臂和支托)和部件变形(固位臂和支架主体)。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)检验来确定组间差异(α = 0.05)。

结果

印模 - 铸造组和印模 - 选择性激光熔化组在部件适合性方面未观察到差异(P>0.05),且两者均优于IOS - 选择性激光熔化组(P<0.001)。印模 - 选择性激光熔化组观察到的固位臂变形最小。印模 - 铸造组和印模 - 选择性激光熔化组在支架主体变形方面无差异(P = 0.92),且两者均优于IOS - 选择性激光熔化组(P<0.05)。IOS - 选择性激光熔化组的支架看起来比主模型窄。

结论

由传统铸型制作的支架在部件适合性方面表现相当。在一些比较中,选择性激光熔化制造比铸造产生的变形更小。由IOS制作的支架具有最大的适合性误差和变形。由于所有支架均未调整就就位在主模型上,本研究结果的临床相关性尚待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验