van Leer Bram, Haitsma Mulier Jelle L G, van Stee Cornelis P, Demenaga Kiki M, Slart Riemer H J A, van Meurs Matijs, Glaudemans Andor W J M, Nijsten Maarten W N, Derde Lennie P G, Pillay Janesh
Department of Critical Care, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Feb 20;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01444-0.
Some ICU patients remain critically ill despite reversal of the original admission diagnosis, driven by a cascade of events resulting in new and persistent organ failure. Secondary infections and systemic inflammation are important components of this cascade and may be visualised using [F]FDG PET/CT. The aim of this dual centre retrospective study was to assess the ability of [F]FDG PET/CT to identify infectious and inflammatory foci in patients with persistent critical illness and to evaluate its impact on subsequent therapy management.
We included patients admitted to the ICU between 2017 and 2024, in whom a [F]FDG PET/CT scan was performed ten days or more after ICU admission. [F]FDG PET/CT reports were reviewed for diagnoses, and clinical records were reviewed to determine if this diagnosis was new, which diagnostics were performed before the PET/CT, and which therapeutic changes were made directly after the PET/CT. The relation between inflammatory parameters and [F]FDG PET/CT findings were studied using t-test or ANOVA.
Forty-seven patients with persistent critical illness were included from two university medical centres. The median interval between admission and PET/CT was 21 days (IQR 14-28). In 43 patients (91%) a potential infectious or inflammatory focus was detected, of which 34 (72%) were previously unknown. The [F]FDG PET/CT was utilized late in the diagnostic work-up since a median of 7 (IQR 6.0-8.0) diagnostic procedures were performed prior to the PET/CT. In 26 (55%) patients therapy change was reported within 48 h after the PET/CT.
[F]FDG PET/CT detected a considerable number of (new) infectious and inflammatory foci in patients with persistent critical illness, often followed by a change in therapy. Further research is needed to establish the role of [F]FDG PET/CT in these patients.
尽管最初的入院诊断已得到扭转,但一些重症监护病房(ICU)患者仍病情危重,这是由一系列导致新的持续性器官衰竭的事件所驱动。继发性感染和全身炎症是这一系列事件的重要组成部分,并且可以使用[F]氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描([F]FDG PET/CT)进行可视化。这项双中心回顾性研究的目的是评估[F]FDG PET/CT识别持续性危重症患者感染和炎症病灶的能力,并评估其对后续治疗管理的影响。
我们纳入了2017年至2024年间入住ICU的患者,这些患者在入住ICU十天或更久后进行了[F]FDG PET/CT扫描。对[F]FDG PET/CT报告进行诊断审查,并查阅临床记录以确定该诊断是否为新诊断、在PET/CT之前进行了哪些诊断以及在PET/CT之后直接进行了哪些治疗改变。使用t检验或方差分析研究炎症参数与[F]FDG PET/CT结果之间的关系。
来自两个大学医学中心的47例持续性危重症患者被纳入研究。入院与PET/CT之间的中位间隔时间为21天(四分位间距14 - 28天)。在43例患者(91%)中检测到潜在的感染或炎症病灶,其中34例(72%)此前未知。由于在PET/CT之前中位数为7次(四分位间距6.0 - 8.0次)诊断程序已被执行,[F]FDG PET/CT在诊断检查中使用较晚。在26例(55%)患者中,在PET/CT后48小时内报告了治疗改变。
[F]FDG PET/CT在持续性危重症患者中检测到相当数量的(新的)感染和炎症病灶,通常随后会有治疗改变。需要进一步研究以确定[F]FDG PET/CT在这些患者中的作用。