Vanvanhossou Sèyi Fridaïus Ulrich, Yin Tong, Gorjanc Gregor, König Sven
Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, 35390, Gießen, Germany.
The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Genet Sel Evol. 2025 Feb 20;57(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00952-8.
Crossbreeding is successfully implemented worldwide to improve animal productivity and adaptability. However, recurrent failures of crossbreeding programmes in African countries imply the need to design effective strategies for the predominant smallholder production systems.
A comprehensive simulation procedure mimicked body weight (BW) and tick count (TC) incidence in a local taurine cattle breed and in an exotic indicine beef cattle breed (BW and TC, respectively). The two breeds were crossed to produce F1 and rotational animals. Additionally, synthetic breeds were created by applying four schemes defined as farm bull (FB), intra-village bull (IVB), exchanged-village bull (EVB), and population-wide bull (PWB) scheme. These schemes reflect different strategies to select and allocate bulls to smallholder farms. The different crosses were compared with the local breed over 20 generations by varying the genetic correlation between the traits ( = - 0.4, 0, 0.4), genotype-by-environment effects (GxE) between local and exotic environment ( = 0.4, 0.6, 0.8), and the relative emphasis of TC compared to BW in a selection index (SI_TCL10%, SI_TCL30%, SI_TCL50%).
Regardless of and , EVB achieved the highest phenotypic and genetic gains for BW and TC over the 20 generations with SI_TCL50%. However, EVB displayed lower phenotypic means than F1 crosses in the first seven generations due to the loss of heterosis. Additive genetic variances were generally larger in synthetic crosses than in F1 and local animals, explaining the larger responses to selection. In addition, the EVB was the most effective strategy to stabilize inbreeding and retain heterosis in the advanced generations of synthetic animals. Low emphasis on TC (SI_TCL30%, SI_TCL10%) resulted in negative phenotypic gain for TC in synthetic animals when r = - 0.4. In contrast to F1 and rotational crosses, GxE effects did not affect phenotypic gain in synthetic crosses.
The study demonstrates opportunities for long-term genetic improvement of adaptive and productive performances in smallholder cattle farms using synthetic breeding. Extensive exchange of semen between villages or regions controls inbreeding and additionally contributes to increasing genetic gain. Furthermore, the definition of a suitable selection index prevents antagonistic selection responses caused by negative correlations between traits and GxE effects.
杂交育种在全球范围内成功实施,以提高动物生产力和适应性。然而,非洲国家杂交育种计划反复失败,这意味着需要为主要的小农户生产系统设计有效的策略。
一个综合模拟程序模拟了当地瘤牛品种和外来印度肉牛品种的体重(BW)和蜱虫数量(TC)发生率(分别为BW和TC)。将这两个品种进行杂交,以产生F1代和轮回杂交动物。此外,通过应用定义为农场公牛(FB)、村内公牛(IVB)、村际交换公牛(EVB)和全群体公牛(PWB)计划的四种方案创建了合成品种。这些方案反映了为小农户农场选择和分配公牛的不同策略。通过改变性状之间的遗传相关性(r = -0.4、0、0.4)、当地和外来环境之间的基因型×环境效应(G×E)(α = 0.4、0.6、0.8)以及选择指数(SI_TCL10%、SI_TCL30%、SI_TCL50%)中TC相对于BW的相对权重,将不同的杂交组合与当地品种在20个世代中进行比较。
无论r和α如何,在SI_TCL5%的情况下,EVB在20个世代中BW和TC的表型和遗传进展最高。然而,由于杂种优势的丧失,EVB在前七代中的表型均值低于F1杂交组合。合成杂交组合中的加性遗传方差通常大于F1代和当地动物,这解释了对选择的更大反应。此外,EVB是在合成动物的高级世代中稳定近交和保留杂种优势的最有效策略。当r = -0.4时,对TC的低权重(SI_TCL30%,SI_TCL10%)导致合成动物中TC的表型进展为负。与F1代和轮回杂交组合不同,G×E效应不影响合成杂交组合的表型进展。
该研究证明了利用合成育种对小农户养牛场的适应性和生产性能进行长期遗传改良的机会。村庄或地区之间广泛的精液交换控制了近交,并有助于增加遗传进展。此外,定义合适的选择指数可防止性状之间的负相关和G×E效应引起的拮抗选择反应。