Apale Iris Pasion, Agnew Adam, Foley Daniel
University College Dublin Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 May;26(5):e70058. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70058. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
This study compared three Brainlab thermoplastic masks-Cranial 4pi basic, stereotactic (Close Mask V2), and open-face-to see how well they limited head movement during Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Using a head phantom, we tested rotational movements (pitch, yaw, and roll) and measured displacements with the ExacTrac system. The open-face mask had the smallest mean displacements (pitch: 0.14 ± 0.03°, yaw: 0.11 ± 0.02°, roll: 0.16 ± 0.03°) and performed slightly better than the stereotactic mask in pitch (0.20 ± 0.04°, p = 0.0173). The stereotactic mask performed similarly in yaw (0.09 ± 0.02°) and roll (0.16 ± 0.04°). The basic mask showed much more movement (pitch: 0.44 ± 0.13°, yaw: 0.28 ± 0.07°, roll: 0.26 ± 0.07°), making it less suitable for SRS. These results apply to the solid two-piece masks tested here and show that both the open-face and stereotactic masks provide reliable immobilization for accurate SRS treatments.
本研究比较了三种Brainlab热塑性面罩——头颅4π基础面罩、立体定向面罩(Close Mask V2)和开放式面罩,以观察它们在立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)期间限制头部运动的效果如何。我们使用头部模型测试了旋转运动(俯仰、偏航和滚动),并使用ExacTrac系统测量了位移。开放式面罩的平均位移最小(俯仰:0.14±0.03°,偏航:0.11±0.02°,滚动:0.16±0.03°),在俯仰方面的表现略优于立体定向面罩(0.20±0.04°,p = 0.0173)。立体定向面罩在偏航(0.09±0.02°)和滚动(0.16±0.04°)方面表现相似。基础面罩的运动幅度更大(俯仰:0.44±0.13°,偏航:0.28±0.07°,滚动:0.26±0.07°),使其不太适合SRS。这些结果适用于此处测试的实心两件式面罩,表明开放式面罩和立体定向面罩都能为精确的SRS治疗提供可靠的固定。