Suppr超能文献

选择性提醒测试:四种形式的等效性检验。

Selective reminding test: an examination of the equivalence of four forms.

作者信息

Hannay H J, Levin H S

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1985 Jun;7(3):251-63. doi: 10.1080/01688638508401258.

Abstract

Four forms of a selective reminding test were administered to 20 male and 20 female subjects 1 week apart in one of four orders determined by a Latin square. On many of the dependent measures, Form 1 was significantly more difficult than the other three forms, which were equivalent in difficulty. For many of the measures, performance on the first test administered was significantly lower than that on the third and fourth tests administered. Performance on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th tests administered was similar. Males made significantly more intrusions than females. Interclass correlation coefficients ranged from .414 to .654. Implications for clinical use of the selective reminding tests are discussed.

摘要

对20名男性和20名女性受试者进行了四种形式的选择性提醒测试,测试间隔为1周,测试顺序由拉丁方确定的四种顺序之一。在许多相关测量中,形式1明显比其他三种形式更难,而其他三种形式难度相当。在许多测量中,首次进行测试时的表现明显低于第三次和第四次测试时的表现。第二次、第三次和第四次测试时的表现相似。男性的侵入错误明显多于女性。组内相关系数在0.414至0.654之间。文中讨论了选择性提醒测试在临床应用中的意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验