Kotera Yasuhiro, Daryanani Riddhi, Skipper Oliver, Simpson Jonathan, Takhi Simran, McPhilbin Merly, Ingall Benjamin-Rose, Namasaba Mariam, Jepps Jessica, Kellermann Vanessa, Bhandari Divya, Ojio Yasutaka, Ronaldson Amy, Guerrero Estefania, Jebara Tesnime, Henderson Claire, Slade Mike, Vilar-Lluch Sara
Institute of Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Center for Infectious Disease Education and Research, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 21;9:e64087. doi: 10.2196/64087.
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how critical discourse analysis (CDA) frameworks can be used in cross-cultural mental health recovery research. CDA is a qualitative approach that critically appraises how language contributes to producing and reinforcing social inequalities. CDA regards linguistic productions as reflecting, consciously or unconsciously, the narrators' understandings of, or attitudes about, phenomena. Mental health recovery research aims to identify and address power differentials, making CDA a potentially relevant approach. However, CDA frameworks have not been widely applied to mental health recovery research. We adapted established CDA frameworks to our cross-cultural mental health recovery study. The adapted methodology comprises (1) selecting discourses that indicate positive changes and (2) considering sociocultural practices informed by relevant cultural characteristics identified in our previous research, without placing value judgments. Our adapted framework can support cross-cultural mental health recovery research that uses CDA.
本文的目的是展示批判性话语分析(CDA)框架如何应用于跨文化心理健康康复研究。CDA是一种定性方法,它批判性地评估语言如何促成并强化社会不平等。CDA认为语言产物有意识或无意识地反映了叙述者对现象的理解或态度。心理健康康复研究旨在识别并解决权力差异,这使得CDA成为一种潜在相关的方法。然而,CDA框架尚未广泛应用于心理健康康复研究。我们将已有的CDA框架应用于我们的跨文化心理健康康复研究。改编后的方法包括:(1)选择表明积极变化的话语;(2)考虑由我们之前研究中确定的相关文化特征所形成的社会文化实践,而不进行价值判断。我们改编后的框架能够支持使用CDA的跨文化心理健康康复研究。