Suppr超能文献

俯卧位对重症监护病房患者呼吸机参数、血气水平及呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响:一项随机对照试验。

The effect of prone positioning on ventilator parameters, blood gas levels, and ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care unit patients: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Dedeoğlu Demir Burcu, Enç Nuray, Börekçi Şermin

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Nursing, Istanbul Arel University, Cevizlibag Campus, Merkez Efendi Mah. Eski Londra Asfaltı Cd. No:1/3, Cevizlibağ- Zeytinburnu, Istanbul, 34010, Turkey.

Florence Nightingale Faculty Of Nursing, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Abide-i Hürriyet Cd, 34381, Şişli/İstanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 21;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02817-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was planned to compare the prone position and non-prone position groups and to evaluate arterial blood gas results, mechanical ventilator values and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) status before, during, and after patients were brought back to the non-prone position.

DESIGN

This study is a randomized controlled trial with a parallel-group design and a 1:1 allocation ratio. A block randomisation method was used to ensure balanced allocation between two groups.

SETTING

The research was conducted in the 14-bed and 26-bed general ICUs of two private hospitals on the European side of Istanbul.

PARTICIPANTS

The 94 eligible participants were randomly divided into two groups. 52 participants were assigned to the prone position group, while 42 participants were assigned to the non-prone position group, which served as the control group. In the end, 40 participants were in each group.

INTERVENTION

The intervention involved placing patients in the prone position and monitoring their arterial blood gas results, mechanical ventilator values, and VAP status at multiple stages: before, during, and after returning them to the non-prone position. Each patient was followed for a minimum of 5 days.

RESULTS

The majority of the participants were male (51.2%) and aged 45-64 (48.8%). The comparison of experimental and control groups indicated statistically significant difference in saturation, FiO₂, inspiratory-expiratory tidal volume, and blood gas levels of the patients in the treatment group (p = 0.001; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The change in the experimental group was greater than in the control group. In conclusion, the mechanical ventilator parameters and blood gas levels of the patients in the treatment group were better than those of the patients in the control group. It is recommended as an effective practice in patients receiving prone position mechanical ventilation (MV).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND REGISTRATION DATE

NCT05760716/ March 6, 2023 (This trial was registered retrospectively at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration Number: NCT05760716) after its completion due to demanded revisions. The integrity of the data and adherence to the study protocol were ensured throughout. The trial adhered to ethical standards (ethics committee approval, informed consent) even if it was not registered prospectively).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较俯卧位组和非俯卧位组,并评估患者在恢复至非俯卧位之前、期间和之后的动脉血气结果、机械通气参数以及呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)状态。

设计

本研究为随机对照试验,采用平行组设计,分配比例为1:1。采用区组随机化方法确保两组间分配均衡。

地点

研究在伊斯坦布尔欧洲区两家私立医院的14张床位和26张床位的综合重症监护病房进行。

参与者

94名符合条件的参与者被随机分为两组。52名参与者被分配到俯卧位组,42名参与者被分配到非俯卧位组作为对照组。最终,每组各有40名参与者。

干预措施

干预措施包括将患者置于俯卧位,并在多个阶段监测其动脉血气结果、机械通气参数和VAP状态:恢复至非俯卧位之前、期间和之后。每位患者至少随访5天。

结果

大多数参与者为男性(51.2%),年龄在45 - 64岁之间(48.8%)。实验组和对照组的比较表明,治疗组患者的饱和度、吸入氧浓度(FiO₂)、吸气 - 呼气潮气量和血气水平存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.001;p < 0.01)。

结论

实验组的变化大于对照组。总之,治疗组患者的机械通气参数和血气水平优于对照组。建议将其作为接受俯卧位机械通气(MV)患者的有效做法。

临床试验注册号及注册日期

NCT05760716/2023年3月6日(由于要求的修订,本试验在完成后于ClinicalTrials.gov(注册号:NCT05760716)进行了回顾性注册。在整个过程中确保了数据的完整性和对研究方案的遵守。即使未进行前瞻性注册,该试验也遵循了伦理标准(伦理委员会批准、知情同意))

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9188/11846282/6840c16140f8/12912_2025_2817_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验