Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 机械通气患者的俯卧位:一项超过 1000 例患者的多中心研究。

Prone position in intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19: a multi-centric study of more than 1000 patients.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2021 Apr 6;25(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03552-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the use of prone position in intubated, invasively ventilated patients with Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). Aim of this study is to investigate the use and effect of prone position in this population during the first 2020 pandemic wave.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicentre, national cohort study conducted between February 24 and June 14, 2020, in 24 Italian Intensive Care Units (ICU) on adult patients needing invasive mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. Clinical data were collected on the day of ICU admission. Information regarding the use of prone position was collected daily. Follow-up for patient outcomes was performed on July 15, 2020. The respiratory effects of the first prone position were studied in a subset of 78 patients. Patients were classified as Oxygen Responders if the PaO/FiO ratio increased ≥ 20 mmHg during prone position and as Carbon Dioxide Responders if the ventilatory ratio was reduced during prone position.

RESULTS

Of 1057 included patients, mild, moderate and severe ARDS was present in 15, 50 and 35% of patients, respectively, and had a resulting mortality of 25, 33 and 41%. Prone position was applied in 61% of the patients. Patients placed prone had a more severe disease and died significantly more (45% vs. 33%, p < 0.001). Overall, prone position induced a significant increase in PaO/FiO ratio, while no change in respiratory system compliance or ventilatory ratio was observed. Seventy-eight % of the subset of 78 patients were Oxygen Responders. Non-Responders had a more severe respiratory failure and died more often in the ICU (65% vs. 38%, p = 0.047). Forty-seven % of patients were defined as Carbon Dioxide Responders. These patients were older and had more comorbidities; however, no difference in terms of ICU mortality was observed (51% vs. 37%, p = 0.189 for Carbon Dioxide Responders and Non-Responders, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

During the COVID-19 pandemic, prone position has been widely adopted to treat mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure. The majority of patients improved their oxygenation during prone position, most likely due to a better ventilation perfusion matching.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT04388670.

摘要

背景

关于在患有 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的插管、有创通气患者中使用俯卧位的数据有限。本研究的目的是在 2020 年第一波大流行期间调查该人群中俯卧位的使用情况和效果。

方法

这是一项于 2020 年 2 月 24 日至 6 月 14 日在意大利 24 个重症监护病房(ICU)进行的回顾性、多中心、全国性队列研究,纳入了因 COVID-19 导致呼吸衰竭而需要有创机械通气的成年患者。在 ICU 入院当天收集临床数据。每日收集俯卧位使用信息。于 2020 年 7 月 15 日对患者结局进行随访。在 78 例患者亚组中研究了首次俯卧位的呼吸效果。如果患者在俯卧位时 PaO/FiO 比值增加≥20mmHg,则将其分类为氧反应者,如果患者在俯卧位时通气比降低,则将其分类为二氧化碳反应者。

结果

在纳入的 1057 例患者中,轻度、中度和重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征分别占 15%、50%和 35%,死亡率分别为 25%、33%和 41%。61%的患者采用了俯卧位。俯卧位患者的疾病更严重,死亡率显著更高(45%比 33%,p<0.001)。总体而言,俯卧位可显著提高 PaO/FiO 比值,而呼吸系统顺应性或通气比无变化。78%的 78 例患者亚组为氧反应者。非反应者呼吸衰竭更严重,在 ICU 死亡更多(65%比 38%,p=0.047)。47%的患者为二氧化碳反应者。这些患者年龄较大,合并症更多;然而,两组 ICU 死亡率无差异(51%比 37%,p=0.189)。

结论

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,广泛采用俯卧位治疗有呼吸衰竭的机械通气患者。大多数患者在俯卧位时改善了氧合,这可能是由于更好的通气灌注匹配。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 注册号:NCT04388670。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9025/8022366/1dffe7a0503d/13054_2021_3552_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验