Timmerman Philip, White Steve, Adcock Neil, Arfvidsson Cecilia, Barfield Matthew, Cowan Kyra, Ferrari Luca, Golob Michaela, Goodwin Lee, Hughes Richard, Ivanova Tsvetelina, Laurén Anna, McDougall Stuart, Nelson Robert, van de Merbel Nico, Verhaeghe Tom, Wright Michael
European Bioanalysis Forum, Brussels, Belgium.
GSK, Precision Medicine Design Assurance, Stevenage, UK.
Bioanalysis. 2025 Mar;17(6):379-382. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2468596. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
The release of the ICH M12 Guideline on Drug Interaction Studies has reignited discussions around assay validation requirements for assays such as plasma protein-binding studies. Even though the ICH M12 does not directly reference the ICH M10 Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation and Sample Analysis, its release prompted further discussions on assay validation requirements for these studies during the 17th European Bioanalysis Forum Open Symposium held in Barcelona, Spain, from 19 to 21 November 2024, where we advocated for a Context-of-Use driven approach over rigid adherence to ICH M10 standards. Context-of-Use driven validation ensures assays are tailored to the specific scientific and regulatory needs, optimizing resource allocation and innovation in drug development. This short opinion paper explores the potential and undesired implications of ICH M12 on bioanalytical validation practices, highlights the distinction between exploratory assays and assays having a clinical impact, and underscores the necessity for tailored validation strategies.
《人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)M12药物相互作用研究指南》的发布重新引发了关于血浆蛋白结合研究等分析方法验证要求的讨论。尽管ICH M12并未直接引用《人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)M10生物分析方法验证和样品分析指南》,但其发布促使在2024年11月19日至21日于西班牙巴塞罗那举行的第17届欧洲生物分析论坛开放研讨会上,针对这些研究的分析方法验证要求展开了进一步讨论,在此次研讨会上,我们主张采用基于使用背景驱动的方法,而非严格遵循ICH M10标准。基于使用背景驱动的验证可确保分析方法针对特定的科学和监管需求进行定制,从而优化药物研发中的资源分配和创新。这篇简短的观点文章探讨了ICH M12对生物分析验证实践的潜在及不良影响,强调了探索性分析方法与具有临床影响的分析方法之间的区别,并强调了定制验证策略的必要性。