Samuels Abigail, Irie Kei, Mizuno Tomoyuki, Reifenberg Jack, Punt Nieko, Vinks Alexander A, Minar Phillip
Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Division of Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb;18(2):e70086. doi: 10.1111/cts.70086.
The use of model-informed precision dosing to personalize infliximab has been shown to improve both the acquisition of concentration targets and clinical outcomes during maintenance. Current iterations of infliximab pharmacokinetic models include time-varying covariates of drug clearance, however, not accounting for the expected improvements in the covariates can lead to indiscriminate use of higher infliximab doses and imprecise drug exposure. The aim was to identify changes in the four biomarkers associated with infliximab clearance (Xiong et al. model) and determine if integration of these dynamic changes would improve model performance during induction and early maintenance. We analyzed two cohorts of children receiving infliximab for Crohn's Disease. The E method was used to assess time-varying changes in covariates. Model performance (observed vs. predicted infliximab concentrations) was evaluated using median percentage error (bias) and median absolute percentage error (precision). The combined cohorts included 239 Crohn's disease patients. We found from baseline to dose 4, the maximum changes in weight, albumin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and neutrophil CD64 were 4.7%, +11.7%, -62.4%, and -26.5%, respectively. We also found the use of baseline covariates alone to forecast future trough concentration was inferior to the E time-varying method with a significant improvement observed in bias (doses 2, 3, and 4) and precision (doses 2 and 4). The integration of the four time-varying biomarkers of drug clearance with pharmacokinetic modeling improved the accuracy and precision of the predictions. This novel strategy may be key to improving drug exposure, minimizing indiscriminate dosing strategies, and reducing healthcare costs.
模型指导的精准给药用于英夫利昔单抗个体化给药已被证明可改善维持治疗期间浓度目标的达成情况及临床结局。英夫利昔单抗药代动力学模型的当前迭代版本包含药物清除率的时变协变量,然而,未考虑协变量的预期改善可能导致英夫利昔单抗剂量的随意增加和药物暴露不准确。目的是确定与英夫利昔单抗清除率相关的四种生物标志物(熊等人的模型)的变化,并确定整合这些动态变化是否会改善诱导期和早期维持期的模型性能。我们分析了两组接受英夫利昔单抗治疗克罗恩病的儿童。采用E方法评估协变量的时变变化。使用中位百分比误差(偏差)和中位绝对百分比误差(精度)评估模型性能(观察到的与预测的英夫利昔单抗浓度)。合并后的队列包括239例克罗恩病患者。我们发现从基线到第4剂,体重、白蛋白、红细胞沉降率和中性粒细胞CD64的最大变化分别为4.7%、+11.7%、-62.4%和-26.5%。我们还发现仅使用基线协变量预测未来谷浓度不如E时变方法,在偏差(第2、3和4剂)和精度(第2和4剂)方面有显著改善。将四种药物清除率的时变生物标志物与药代动力学模型相结合提高了预测的准确性和精度。这种新策略可能是改善药物暴露、尽量减少随意给药策略和降低医疗成本的关键。