Metzger Kristina B, Smith Romario, Freed Sara A, Sartin Emma, Pfeiffer Melissa R, O'Malley Lauren, Curry Allison E
Center for Injury Research and Prevention Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia USA.
Center for Injury Research and Prevention Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia USA.
J Safety Res. 2025 Feb;92:522-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2025.01.006. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
Transportation safety priorities emphasize the importance of incorporating equity into efforts to reduce deaths and injuries. Using integrated data, we investigated relationships between individual- and residence-based measures of equity and rates of crash involvement in New Jersey, 2016-2019.
We used statewide integrated data that includes linked crash reports, hospital discharge data, and residence-based equity measures. We calculated crash rates among drivers involved in and injured in a crash by residential census tract. Using generalized Poisson regression, we estimated rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (aRR, 95% CI) in separate models for race and ethnicity categories and for six previously developed, multi-dimensional equity measures, controlling for driver sex and age.
We identified 1,629,219 drivers involved in crashes of whom 8.3% were injured. Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black drivers had higher rates of crash involvement than non-Hispanic White drivers (aRR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.65-1.68] and aRR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.77-1.80], respectively). For community equity measures, drivers who resided in census tracts with poorest equity scores had higher crash rates than those living in census tracts with most favorable equity scores (e.g., Index of Concentration at the Extremes: aRR, 2.10 [95% CI, 2.07-2.12]). We observed similar results for injury crash rates. Model fit improved for both all crashes and injury crashes models after adding each equity measure to baseline.
Rates of all crashes and injury crashes were consistently higher among drivers of minoritized race and ethnicity groups and among those who lived in less equitable communities. Associations among crash rates and different equity measures provided similar evidence that disparities in traffic safety outcomes are related to inequity.
The usefulness of individual and residence-based equity measures lies in the opportunity to identify communities with higher crash risks for tailored intervention to improve traffic safety and to reduce disparities.
交通安全重点强调了将公平性纳入减少死亡和伤害工作的重要性。我们利用综合数据,调查了2016 - 2019年新泽西州基于个人和居住地的公平性指标与撞车事故发生率之间的关系。
我们使用了全州范围的综合数据,其中包括关联的撞车事故报告、医院出院数据以及基于居住地的公平性指标。我们按居民普查区计算了撞车事故中涉事及受伤司机的撞车率。使用广义泊松回归,我们在针对种族和族裔类别以及六种先前制定的多维公平性指标的单独模型中估计率比和95%置信区间(aRR,95% CI),并控制司机的性别和年龄。
我们确定了1,629,219名涉事司机,其中8.3%受伤。西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑人司机的撞车事故发生率高于非西班牙裔白人司机(aRR分别为1.67 [95% CI,1.65 - 1.68]和aRR为1.78 [95% CI,1.77 - 1.80])。对于社区公平性指标,居住在公平性得分最差普查区的司机的撞车率高于居住在公平性得分最有利普查区的司机(例如,极端集中度指数:aRR为2.10 [95% CI,2.07 - 2.12])。我们在受伤撞车率方面也观察到了类似结果。在将每个公平性指标添加到基线后,所有撞车事故模型和受伤撞车事故模型的拟合度均有所改善。
在少数族裔和种族群体的司机以及生活在公平性较低社区的司机中,所有撞车事故和受伤撞车事故的发生率一直较高。撞车率与不同公平性指标之间的关联提供了类似证据,表明交通安全结果的差异与不公平性有关。
基于个人和居住地的公平性指标的有用之处在于有机会识别撞车风险较高的社区,以便进行针对性干预,从而改善交通安全并减少差异。