Gómez-Ugarte Ana C, Basellini Ugofilippo, Camarda Carlo G, Janssen Fanny, Zagheni Emilio
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Institut national d'études démographiques, Aubervilliers, France.
Popul Health Metr. 2025 Feb 22;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12963-025-00365-1.
Commonly used measures of socioeconomic inequalities in mortality, such as the slope and the relative index of inequality, are based on summary measures of the group-specific age-at-death distributions (e.g. standardized mortality rate or life expectancy). While this approach is informative, it ignores valuable information contained in the group-specific distributions. A recent approach applied a measure of distributional dissimilarity (the non-overlap index) to measure lifespan stratification. In this paper, we rigorously evaluate and further implement the multi-group extension of the non-overlap index ( ) to measure socioeconomic inequalities in mortality across a number of groups, and assess whether differences across countries and over time are driven by mortality or compositional changes in two applications with different data availability: educational groups (Sweden and Denmark) and groups defined by an area-level deprivation measure (England). Our findings suggest that the multi-group is sensitive not only to changes in the means or variances, but also to broader mortality changes that affect distributional shapes. The method can be employed to any context where mortality rates by age are available by sub-groups. Furthermore, levels and trends in mortality inequalities computed with the multigroup often differ compared to other conventional summary-based measures. Moreover, we find that the contribution of mortality changes to changes in inequalities is generally greater than that of the changes in the population composition. Whereas levels and trends of inequalities may depend on whether life expectancy- or lifespan variation-based measures are employed, the multi-group provides a holistic perspective by capturing both dimensions simultaneously.
常用的死亡率社会经济不平等衡量指标,如斜率和不平等相对指数,是基于特定群体死亡年龄分布的汇总指标(如标准化死亡率或预期寿命)。虽然这种方法提供了信息,但它忽略了特定群体分布中包含的有价值信息。最近的一种方法应用了分布差异度量(非重叠指数)来衡量寿命分层。在本文中,我们严格评估并进一步实施非重叠指数( )的多组扩展,以衡量多个群体间死亡率的社会经济不平等,并通过两个具有不同数据可用性的应用案例(教育群体(瑞典和丹麦)以及由地区层面贫困度量定义的群体(英格兰))评估国家间和不同时间的差异是由死亡率变化还是构成变化驱动的。我们的研究结果表明,多组非重叠指数不仅对均值或方差的变化敏感,而且对影响分布形状的更广泛死亡率变化也敏感。该方法可应用于任何能按亚组获取年龄别死亡率的情况。此外,与其他基于传统汇总指标计算的死亡率不平等水平和趋势相比,多组非重叠指数计算出的结果往往不同。而且,我们发现死亡率变化对不平等变化的贡献通常大于人口构成变化的贡献。虽然不平等的水平和趋势可能取决于采用基于预期寿命还是寿命差异的度量指标,但多组非重叠指数通过同时捕捉这两个维度提供了一个整体视角。