Vaaben Naja, Dieckmann Peter, Møller Ann Merete
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Mar;69(3):e14591. doi: 10.1111/aas.14591.
Leadership is a key skill for physicians, but studies show that many junior doctors feel unprepared for the role as a leader. In recent years, there has been increasing interest and research into the training and development of clinical leadership, revolving around leadership in situations with direct patient care and as opposed to the administrative leadership of a department. However, the lack of consensus on how best to teach leadership, how the education should be structured, as well as a standardized definition and measure for good leadership, complicates training, assessment, and comparison of approaches in both research and education.
The aim of this study is to map out the existing body of research on leadership education for physicians and medical students and identify any gaps in this literature.
The scoping review will follow the Arksey and O'Malley (Arksey and O'Malley, Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005; 8(1):19-32) framework, Joanna Briggs Institute methodology (JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis-JBI Global Wiki) and PRISMA_ScR (Tricco et al., Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7):467-473). A systematic search will be conducted across the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Ebsco, Medline, and Google scholar. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, then review the full texts of articles. Data will be extracted and presented in line with the review questions.
The study will use a structured approach, as guided by Arksey and O'Malley and JBI methodology. Studies not written in English, Danish, German, Swedish, and Norwegian will be translated using available software. This review will not include a formal assessment of the study quality or meta-analysis, as it is a scoping review.
领导力是医生的一项关键技能，但研究表明，许多初级医生对担任领导角色感到准备不足。近年来，人们对临床领导力的培训和发展越来越感兴趣并开展了相关研究，其重点是直接参与患者护理情境中的领导力，而非部门的行政领导能力。然而，对于如何以最佳方式教授领导力、教育应如何构建，以及良好领导力的标准化定义和衡量标准，缺乏共识，这使得研究和教育中的培训、评估及方法比较变得复杂。
本研究的目的是梳理关于医生和医学生领导力教育的现有研究文献，并找出该文献中的任何空白。
范围综述将遵循阿克西和奥马利（Arksey和O'Malley，《国际社会研究方法杂志》。2005年；8(1):19 - 32）的框架、乔安娜·布里格斯研究所方法（JBI证据综合手册 - JBI全球维基）和PRISMA_ScR（特里科等人，《内科学年鉴》。《内科学年鉴》。2018年；169(7):467 - 473）。将在以下数据库中进行系统检索：PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Ebsco、Medline和谷歌学术。两名独立评审员将筛选标题和摘要，然后审查文章全文。将根据综述问题提取并呈现数据。
本研究将采用结构化方法，以阿克西和奥马利以及JBI方法为指导。非英文、丹麦文、德文、瑞典文和挪威文撰写的研究将使用可用软件进行翻译。由于这是一项范围综述，本综述将不包括对研究质量的正式评估或荟萃分析。
