Peach H
J R Soc Med. 1985 Jun;78(6):445-51. doi: 10.1177/014107688507800605.
Pathologists' opinions of cause of death given at the end of post-mortem (PM) reports have often been used to validate clinicians' death certificates. Information about strokes, common coincident conditions and complications in 120 full PM reports was compared with the pathologists' opinions of cause of death given at the end of the reports. Intracranial haemorrhage and myocardial infarction were mentioned as frequently in the cause of death as in the full PM report. On the other hand, cerebral infarction, precerebral artery occlusion, severe cerebral atheroma, coronary artery occlusion, bronchopneumonia and pulmonary embolism were all under-cited in the causes of death. Whether a pathological condition mentioned in the full PM report also appeared in the cause of death varied with the decedent's age, the extent of the condition and type of stroke. Consideration should be given to using all the information in PM reports rather than just pathologists' opinions of cause of death given at the end of PM reports when studying the validity of clinicians' death certificates.
病理学家在尸检(PM)报告末尾给出的死因意见常被用于验证临床医生开具的死亡证明。将120份完整尸检报告中有关中风、常见合并病症及并发症的信息,与报告末尾病理学家给出的死因意见进行了比较。颅内出血和心肌梗死在死因中被提及的频率与在完整尸检报告中的频率相同。另一方面,脑梗死、大脑前动脉闭塞、严重脑动脉粥样硬化、冠状动脉闭塞、支气管肺炎和肺栓塞在死因中均被引用不足。完整尸检报告中提及的病理状况是否也出现在死因中,因死者年龄、病情严重程度及中风类型而异。在研究临床医生死亡证明的有效性时,应考虑使用尸检报告中的所有信息,而不仅仅是尸检报告末尾病理学家给出的死因意见。