Fotakopoulos George, Georgakopoulou Vasiliki E, Gatos Charalabos, Christodoulidis Grigorios, Foroglou Nikolaos
Department of Neurosurgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Thessaloniki, GRC.
Department of Pathophysiology, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, GRC.
Cureus. 2025 Jan 22;17(1):e77856. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77856. eCollection 2025 Jan.
The choice of treatment of two modalities, open surgical or endovascular, in posterior cerebral artery (PCA) intracranial aneurysms must be taken based on their special characteristics. The objective of this study is to assess the potential superiority in outcomes, operative mortality, and clinical improvement after microsurgical and endovascular management repair in PCA intracranial aneurysms. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we created this study, performing a systematic investigation on the PubMed database, with the last search carried out on June 12, 2016. The eligibility limitations were that only full text was used in the English language, and double-checking was applied. Extracted data was organized on a standard table form, including first author, publication year, general number of patients and patients at follow-up, mortality rate (with 30 days from the selecting treatment), improvement (showing postoperatively at the clinical progress (muscle strength, thinking ability, and disorientation, due to ischemic infarctions following parent vessel occlusion) for the patients of both modalities. There were eight articles that matched our study criteria. The total study population included 8,863 patients with an aneurysm, 184 (2.07%) of which had an aneurysm at the different segments of the PCA. The pooled results revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups, in terms of mortality, but with substantial statistical results concerning clinical improvement. We concluded that the aneurysmal site and size do not influence the treatment outcome. However, clinical improvement was a statistically significant factor, demonstrating the superiority of open surgical management over endovascular treatment (EVT) for PCA aneurysms. The selection of the appropriate procedure for every case must be done based on its special characteristics.
对于大脑后动脉(PCA)颅内动脉瘤,在开放手术和血管内治疗这两种治疗方式中进行选择时,必须依据其特殊特征来决定。本研究的目的是评估在PCA颅内动脉瘤的显微手术和血管内治疗修复后,两种治疗方式在治疗效果、手术死亡率及临床改善方面的潜在优势。按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),我们开展了本研究,对PubMed数据库进行了系统检索,最后一次检索于2016年6月12日进行。纳入标准限制为仅使用英文全文,并进行了双重核对。提取的数据以标准表格形式整理,包括第一作者、发表年份、患者总数及随访患者数、死亡率(自选择治疗起30天内)、改善情况(显示两种治疗方式的患者术后在临床进展方面(因母血管闭塞后的缺血性梗死导致的肌力、思维能力和定向障碍))。有8篇文章符合我们的研究标准。总研究人群包括8863例动脉瘤患者,其中184例(2.07%)在PCA的不同节段有动脉瘤。汇总结果显示,两组在死亡率方面无统计学显著差异,但在临床改善方面有显著统计学结果。我们得出结论,动脉瘤的部位和大小不影响治疗效果。然而,临床改善是一个具有统计学意义的因素,表明对于PCA动脉瘤,开放手术治疗优于血管内治疗(EVT)。必须根据每个病例的特殊特征来选择合适的治疗方法。