Schertenleib Florian Josef, Hochmuth Sabine, Müller Jana Annina, Sandmann Pascale, Radeloff Andreas
Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, University of Oldenburg, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence 'Hearing4all', University of Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Audiol Res. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):8. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010008.
The gold standard for electrocochleography (ECochG) is using dedicated recording devices for auditory evoked potentials. However, these have a very limited time window for recording. The aim of this study is to evaluate EEG amplifiers for ECochG, in particular for recording cochlear microphonics (CMs) without time restriction.
Three high-resolution EEG amplifiers and different types of electrodes were analyzed and compared with a clinical system for recording auditory evoked potentials. For this, CMs were recorded after stimulation with various stimuli in a dummy and in human subjects. In the latter, recordings were made from the tympanic membrane and, during otosurgical procedures, from the promontory. Our evaluation focused on comparing signal amplifiers and electrode types, considering the signal-to-noise ratio, recording characteristics, and measurement reliability.
Using a dummy model, we observed significant differences among devices, electrode types, and stimulus frequencies. These findings were subsequently confirmed in human participant measurements. Nevertheless, EEG amplifiers proved to be feasible for ECochG recordings and offered a recording fidelity comparable to proprietary clinical methods. Importantly, with EEG amplifiers, we were able to record cochlear potentials in response to speech stimuli, revealing a strong correlation (r = 0.78) between recorded signals and the input stimulus.
Our findings indicate that high resolution EEG amplifiers are suitable for recording cochlear potentials, in particular, CMs. This allows for evaluating cochlear signals in response to extended stimuli, in particular, speech stimuli.
电耳蜗图(ECochG)的金标准是使用专门的记录设备来记录听觉诱发电位。然而,这些设备的记录时间窗非常有限。本研究的目的是评估用于ECochG的脑电图放大器,特别是用于无时间限制地记录耳蜗微音电位(CMs)。
分析并比较了三款高分辨率脑电图放大器和不同类型的电极与一套记录听觉诱发电位的临床系统。为此,在模拟模型和人体受试者中,用各种刺激进行刺激后记录CMs。在人体受试者中,记录是在鼓膜处进行的,在耳外科手术过程中,则是在岬部进行的。我们的评估重点是比较信号放大器和电极类型,同时考虑信噪比、记录特性和测量可靠性。
使用模拟模型,我们观察到设备、电极类型和刺激频率之间存在显著差异。这些发现随后在人体受试者测量中得到证实。尽管如此,脑电图放大器被证明对于ECochG记录是可行的,并且提供了与专用临床方法相当的记录保真度。重要的是,使用脑电图放大器,我们能够记录对言语刺激的耳蜗电位,揭示记录信号与输入刺激之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.78)。
我们的研究结果表明,高分辨率脑电图放大器适用于记录耳蜗电位,特别是CMs。这使得能够评估对延长刺激,特别是言语刺激的耳蜗信号。