• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自适配非处方助听器的增益分析:一项比较性纵向分析

Gain Analysis of Self-Fitting Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis.

作者信息

Knoetze Megan, Manchaiah Vinaya, Cormier Kayla, Schimmel Carly, Sharma Anu, Swanepoel De Wet

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Lynnwood Road & Roper Street, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.

Virtual Hearing Lab, a Collaborative Initiative Between the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA, and the University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Audiol Res. 2025 Feb 13;15(1):17. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010017.

DOI:10.3390/audiolres15010017
PMID:39997161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11851972/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the gain provided by self-fitting over-the-counter (SF-OTC) hearing aids compared to clinical NAL-NL2 targets, the differences between various FDA-approved SF-OTC devices, and potential changes in gain over time.

METHODS

Two experiments were conducted: (1) a cross-sectional comparison of six SF-OTC hearing aids (n = 43) and (2) a longitudinal evaluation of gain within five days of self-fitting and four additional time points (n = 15). Real-ear measurements (REMs) were used to measure gain.

RESULTS

SF-OTC hearing aid gain corresponded with 10 dB SPL but not 5 dB SPL criteria from NAL-NL2 targets. Differences between NAL-NL2 targets and gain did not differ significantly between devices. There were no significant changes in gain over time for any input level.

CONCLUSIONS

SF-OTC hearing aids generally provide user-selected gain levels lower than clinical targets, particularly at higher frequencies. The gain remains stable over time, indicating limited user adjustment after initial fitting. OTC hearing aid manufacturers should consider implementing fitting algorithms that allow for gradual user acclimatization.

摘要

目的

研究与临床NAL-NL2目标相比,自适配非处方(SF-OTC)助听器所提供的增益、各种FDA批准的SF-OTC设备之间的差异以及增益随时间的潜在变化。

方法

进行了两项实验:(1)对六种SF-OTC助听器(n = 43)进行横断面比较,以及(2)在自适配后五天内和另外四个时间点对增益进行纵向评估(n = 15)。采用真耳测量(REM)来测量增益。

结果

SF-OTC助听器增益符合NAL-NL2目标中10 dB SPL的标准,但不符合5 dB SPL的标准。设备之间,NAL-NL2目标与增益之间的差异无显著差异。对于任何输入水平,增益随时间均无显著变化。

结论

SF-OTC助听器通常为用户提供低于临床目标的增益水平,尤其是在高频段。增益随时间保持稳定,表明初次适配后用户调整有限。非处方助听器制造商应考虑实施允许用户逐渐适应的适配算法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b95f/11851972/dcc0fc25e88a/audiolres-15-00017-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b95f/11851972/ec367fa19eac/audiolres-15-00017-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b95f/11851972/3064abe5a867/audiolres-15-00017-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b95f/11851972/dcc0fc25e88a/audiolres-15-00017-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b95f/11851972/ec367fa19eac/audiolres-15-00017-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b95f/11851972/3064abe5a867/audiolres-15-00017-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b95f/11851972/dcc0fc25e88a/audiolres-15-00017-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Gain Analysis of Self-Fitting Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis.自适配非处方助听器的增益分析:一项比较性纵向分析
Audiol Res. 2025 Feb 13;15(1):17. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010017.
2
Accuracy of an Automated Hearing Aid Fitting Using Real Ear Measures Embedded in a Manufacturer Fitting Software.基于制造商验配软件中嵌入的真耳测试,评估自动验配助听器的准确性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):157-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722947. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
Comparing Self-Fitting Strategies for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Crossover Clinical Trial.比较非处方助听器的自适配策略:一项交叉临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2007.
4
Investigation of hearing aid fitting according to the national acoustic laboratories' prescription for non-linear hearing aids and the desired sensation level methods in Japanese speakers: a crossover-controlled trial.根据国家声学实验室的非线性助听器处方和日本语者期望感觉水平方法对助听器适配的调查:一项交叉对照试验。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2023 Oct;50(5):708-713. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Comparison of real-ear insertion gains in Japanese-speaking individuals wearing hearing aids with DSLv5 and NAL-NL2.佩戴采用DSLv5和NAL-NL2标准的助听器的日语使用者的真耳插入增益比较。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Feb;48(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
6
Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.改良助听器适配对不同声学场景下响度和音质的影响。
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):483-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000285.
7
Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.非处方自助式助听器与听力学家验配助听器的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):522-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0376.
8
Difference in SII provided by initial fit and NAL-NL2 and its relation to self-reported hearing aid outcomes.初始拟合和 NAL-NL2 提供的 SII 差异及其与自我报告的助听器效果的关系。
Int J Audiol. 2024 Nov;63(11):900-907. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2291633. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
9
An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.两种通用助听器处方方法(NAL-NL2和CAM2)对轻度至中度重度高频听力损失患者的初始适配比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Feb;24(2):138-50. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.2.7.
10
Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.比较两种用于双耳植入人工耳蜗使用者的助听器适配算法。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jan/Feb;40(1):98-106. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000597.

本文引用的文献

1
Usability and Performance of Self-Fitting Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.自适配非处方助听器的可用性与性能
J Am Acad Audiol. 2025 Jan 1;36(1):23-36. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.240037. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2
Comparing Self-Fitting Strategies for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids: A Crossover Clinical Trial.比较非处方助听器的自适配策略:一项交叉临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2007.
3
Long-Term Outcomes of Self-Fit vs Audiologist-Fit Hearing Aids.自适配与验配助听器的长期效果比较。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 1;150(9):765-771. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.1825.
4
Evaluating Quality, Credibility, and Readability of Online Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Information.评估网上非处方助听器信息的质量、可信度和可读性。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jul;134(7):3302-3309. doi: 10.1002/lary.31278. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
5
Listening Preferences of New Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized, Mixed-Methods Clinical Trial of Initial Versus Real-Ear Fit.新成人助听器用户的聆听偏好:初始与真耳拟合的注册、双盲、随机、混合方法临床试验
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231189596. doi: 10.1177/23312165231189596.
6
Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.非处方自助式助听器与听力学家验配助听器的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):522-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0376.
7
Comparing Hearing Aid Outcomes in Adults Using Over-the-Counter and Hearing Care Professional Service Delivery Models.比较使用非处方和听力保健专业服务提供模式的成年人的助听器效果。
Am J Audiol. 2023 Jun;32(2):314-322. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00130. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
8
Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.探管法验证真耳助听听阈增益对成人助听效果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:2331216521999563. doi: 10.1177/2331216521999563.
9
Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for Over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.验证一种非处方助听器的自适配方法。
Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec;24:2331216519900589. doi: 10.1177/2331216519900589.
10
A preliminary investigation into hearing aid fitting based on automated real-ear measurements integrated in the fitting software: test-retest reliability, matching accuracy and perceptual outcomes.基于集成在验配软件中的自动真耳测量进行助听器验配的初步研究:测试-重测信度、匹配准确性和感知结果。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Mar;58(3):132-140. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1543958. Epub 2018 Dec 4.