• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响使用有条件自动驾驶车辆行为意图的因素。

Factors influencing behavioral intentions to use conditionally automated vehicles.

作者信息

Koppel Sjaan, Logan David B, Zou Xin, Kaviani Fareed, McDonald Hayley, Hair Joseph F, St Louis Renée M, Molnar Lisa J, Charlton Judith L

机构信息

Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, VIC, Australia.

Monash University Accident Research Centre, Monash University, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.10.006
PMID:39998543
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study explored factors influencing the acceptance of conditionally automated vehicles among Australian drivers by extending the Technology Acceptance Model with the Technology Readiness Index.

METHOD

Data from an online survey of 844 participants were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).

RESULTS

Perceived usefulness had the strongest direct effect on behavioral intention (0.469, p < 0.001), followed by attitude (0.318, p < 0.001). Innovativeness positively influenced behavioral intention (0.183, p < 0.001), while insecurity had a negative impact (-0.071, p < 0.01). Optimism and discomfort were not significant. Perceived usefulness also had significant indirect effects through attitude (0.156, p < 0.001) and trust (0.072, p < 0.001). Perceived ease of use indirectly influenced behavioral intention through perceived usefulness (0.306, p < 0.001), attitude (0.102, p < 0.001), trust (0.047, p < 0.001), and their combinations. Trust indirectly affected behavioral intention via attitude (0.130, p < 0.001). Perceived security and privacy risks had indirect negative effects through trust and attitude (-0.035, p < 0.001; -0.005, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that fostering acceptance among less tech-savvy individuals may help promote positive attitudes, increase conditionally automated vehicle adoption, and potentially enhance road safety.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest a need for targeted programs to enhance perceived usefulness and trust while addressing security and privacy concerns, ultimately contributing to safer road systems through the adoption of conditionally automated vehicles.

摘要

背景

本研究通过将技术准备指数扩展到技术接受模型,探讨了影响澳大利亚驾驶员对有条件自动驾驶汽车接受度的因素。

方法

使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)分析了来自844名参与者的在线调查数据。

结果

感知有用性对行为意向的直接影响最强(0.469,p<0.001),其次是态度(0.318,p<0.001)。创新性对行为意向有正向影响(0.183,p<0.001),而不安全感有负向影响(-0.071,p<0.01)。乐观和不适不显著。感知有用性还通过态度(0.156,p<0.001)和信任(0.072,p<0.001)产生显著的间接影响。感知易用性通过感知有用性(0.306,p<0.001)、态度(0.102,p<0.001)、信任(0.047,p<0.001)及其组合间接影响行为意向。信任通过态度间接影响行为意向(0.130,p<0.001)。感知安全和隐私风险通过信任和态度产生间接负向影响(-0.035,p<0.001;-0.005,p<0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,培养技术不太熟练的个人的接受度可能有助于促进积极态度,增加有条件自动驾驶汽车的采用,并潜在地提高道路安全性。

实际意义

这些发现表明需要有针对性的计划来提高感知有用性和信任,同时解决安全和隐私问题,最终通过采用有条件自动驾驶汽车为更安全的道路系统做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing behavioral intentions to use conditionally automated vehicles.影响使用有条件自动驾驶车辆行为意图的因素。
J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Examining the effect of personality on user acceptance of conditionally automated vehicles.研究个性对用户接受有条件自动驾驶汽车的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84776-4.
3
Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study.与使用自动驾驶汽车意图相关的社会心理因素:一项模拟驾驶研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
4
Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.感知到的安全和对 SAE 级别 2 部分自动化汽车的信任:来自在线问卷的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0260953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260953. eCollection 2021.
5
Exploring Trust in Self-Driving Vehicles Through Text Analysis.通过文本分析探索对自动驾驶汽车的信任
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):260-277. doi: 10.1177/0018720819872672. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
Assessment of the application of technology acceptance measures to older drivers' acceptance of advanced driver-assistance systems.技术接受度测量在老年驾驶员对先进驾驶辅助系统接受度方面的应用评估。
Appl Ergon. 2025 May;125:104474. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104474. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
7
Automated vehicles and older drivers in Canada.加拿大的自动驾驶汽车与老年驾驶员
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:193-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
8
Take-Over Intention during Conditionally Automated Driving in China: Current Situation and Influencing Factors.中国条件自动驾驶接管意向:现状与影响因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 21;18(21):11076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111076.
9
Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.公众对全自动驾驶的接受度:社会信任和风险/收益感知的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):326-341. doi: 10.1111/risa.13143. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
10
Acceptance of Full Driving Automation: Personally Owned and Shared-Use Concepts.接受全自动驾驶:个人拥有和共享使用概念。
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):288-309. doi: 10.1177/0018720819870658. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A questionnaire-based study of the effect of driving style on the acceptance of active driving guidance.一项基于问卷调查的关于驾驶风格对主动驾驶引导接受度影响的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03352-6.