• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究个性对用户接受有条件自动驾驶汽车的影响。

Examining the effect of personality on user acceptance of conditionally automated vehicles.

作者信息

Nordhoff S, Lehtonen E

机构信息

Department Transport & Planning, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Electric Vehicle Research Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84776-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-84776-4
PMID:39774262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11706942/
Abstract

Automated vehicle acceptance (AVA) research has grown substantially in the past few years. There is a paucity of research on the role of the big five personality traits on attitudes towards automated vehicles (AVs) and AVA. This is a critical shortcoming given that personality is considered a critical factor explaining technology adoption. Our major theoretical contribution is the integration of the most popular personality measure - the big five - and one of the most influential technology acceptance models - Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2). A questionnaire was administered to 9,339 respondents from nine countries to predict the behavioral intention to use conditionally automated vehicles (CondAVs). The original UTAUT2 was extended by trust and driver engagement and the big five personality traits openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Structural equation modeling was applied to examine the direct effects of these constructs on behavioral intention and the indirect effects of the personality traits on the independent constructs of the extended UTAUT2. The results have shown positive effects of social influence, trust, and performance expectancy on the behavioral intention to use CondAVs. Most of the hypotheses pertaining to the role of the personality traits on the UTAUT2 constructs were supported, but the effects were relatively small (< 0.25). Our findings support the usefulness of UTAUT2 in evaluating the success of AVs, providing crucial insights into the factors driving the acceptance of CondAVs. The cross-country analysis provides further insights into the role of an individual's personality for AVA. Our study yields important implications for practitioners. Given the small effect sizes of personality, designing CondAVs around the personalities of their customers during development and commercialization may be ineffective to promote trust and acceptance.

摘要

在过去几年中,自动驾驶车辆验收(AVA)研究有了显著增长。关于大五人格特质在对自动驾驶车辆(AV)态度和AVA方面作用的研究较少。鉴于人格被认为是解释技术采用的关键因素,这是一个严重的缺陷。我们的主要理论贡献是将最流行的人格测量方法——大五人格——与最具影响力的技术接受模型之一——技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT2)进行整合。对来自九个国家的9339名受访者进行了问卷调查,以预测使用有条件自动驾驶车辆(CondAV)的行为意图。原始的UTAUT2通过信任和驾驶员参与以及大五人格特质开放性、尽责性、外向性、宜人性和神经质进行了扩展。应用结构方程模型来检验这些构念对行为意图的直接影响以及人格特质对扩展UTAUT2独立构念的间接影响。结果表明,社会影响、信任和绩效期望对使用CondAV的行为意图有积极影响。与人格特质在UTAUT2构念中作用相关的大多数假设得到了支持,但影响相对较小(<0.25)。我们的研究结果支持UTAUT2在评估AV成功方面的有用性,为推动CondAV接受的因素提供了关键见解。跨国分析进一步深入了解了个体人格对AVA的作用。我们的研究对从业者具有重要意义。鉴于人格的影响大小较小,在开发和商业化过程中围绕客户的人格设计CondAV可能在促进信任和接受方面效果不佳。

相似文献

1
Examining the effect of personality on user acceptance of conditionally automated vehicles.研究个性对用户接受有条件自动驾驶汽车的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):1091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84776-4.
2
Factors influencing behavioral intentions to use conditionally automated vehicles.影响使用有条件自动驾驶车辆行为意图的因素。
J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:423-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.感知到的安全和对 SAE 级别 2 部分自动化汽车的信任:来自在线问卷的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0260953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260953. eCollection 2021.
4
Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study.与使用自动驾驶汽车意图相关的社会心理因素:一项模拟驾驶研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:202-208. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Extension of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 model for predicting mHealth acceptance using diabetes as an example: a cross-sectional validation study.扩展技术接受和使用统一理论模型 2 以预测移动健康接受度:以糖尿病为例的横断面验证研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Nov;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100640.
6
What's Driving Me? Exploration and Validation of a Hierarchical Personality Model for Trust in Automated Driving.是什么在驱使我?对自动驾驶信任的分层人格模型的探索与验证。
Hum Factors. 2021 Sep;63(6):1076-1105. doi: 10.1177/0018720820922653. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions.公众对全自动驾驶的接受度:社会信任和风险/收益感知的影响。
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):326-341. doi: 10.1111/risa.13143. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
8
A priori acceptance of highly automated cars in Australia, France, and Sweden: A theoretically-informed investigation guided by the TPB and UTAUT.澳大利亚、法国和瑞典对高度自动化汽车的先验接受:基于 TPB 和 UTAUT 的理论指导的调查研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;137:105441. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105441. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Trust and Acceptance Challenges in the Adoption of AI Applications in Health Care: Quantitative Survey Analysis.医疗保健领域采用人工智能应用中的信任与接受挑战:定量调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 21;27:e65567. doi: 10.2196/65567.
10
Assessment of the application of technology acceptance measures to older drivers' acceptance of advanced driver-assistance systems.技术接受度测量在老年驾驶员对先进驾驶辅助系统接受度方面的应用评估。
Appl Ergon. 2025 May;125:104474. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104474. Epub 2025 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer patients' acceptance of virtual reality interventions for self-emotion regulation.癌症患者对用于自我情绪调节的虚拟现实干预措施的接受度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(1):12185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95160-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Persona-PhysioSync AV: Personalized Interaction through Personality and Physiology Monitoring in Autonomous Vehicles.人物-生理同步 AV:自动驾驶汽车中的个性和生理监测的个性化交互。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Mar 20;24(6):1977. doi: 10.3390/s24061977.
2
Drivers' Evaluation of Different Automated Driving Styles: Is It Both Comfortable and Natural?驾驶员对不同自动驾驶风格的评价:既舒适又自然吗?
Hum Factors. 2024 Mar;66(3):787-806. doi: 10.1177/00187208221113448. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
3
What's Driving Me? Exploration and Validation of a Hierarchical Personality Model for Trust in Automated Driving.是什么在驱使我?对自动驾驶信任的分层人格模型的探索与验证。
Hum Factors. 2021 Sep;63(6):1076-1105. doi: 10.1177/0018720820922653. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
A priori acceptance of highly automated cars in Australia, France, and Sweden: A theoretically-informed investigation guided by the TPB and UTAUT.澳大利亚、法国和瑞典对高度自动化汽车的先验接受:基于 TPB 和 UTAUT 的理论指导的调查研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Mar;137:105441. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105441. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
5
Predictors of Attitudes Toward Autonomous Vehicles: The Roles of Age, Gender, Prior Knowledge, and Personality.对自动驾驶汽车态度的预测因素:年龄、性别、先验知识和个性的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02589. eCollection 2018.
6
Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits.介绍简短黑暗三性格量表(SD3):一种对黑暗人格特质的简短测量工具。
Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):28-41. doi: 10.1177/1073191113514105. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
7
Assessing how people change.评估人们如何发生变化。
Cancer. 1991 Feb 1;67(3 Suppl):805-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910201)67:3+<805::aid-cncr2820671409>3.0.co;2-4.