Lee Byung Min, Cho Jaeho, Kim Dong-Seok, Chang Jong Hee, Kang Seok-Gu, Kim Eui-Hyun, Moon Ju Hyung, Ahn Sung Soo, Park Yae Won, Suh Chang-Ok, Yoon Hong In
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2025 Mar;66(3):141-150. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0566.
Adjuvant treatment for craniopharyngioma after surgery is controversial. Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can increase the risk of long-term sequelae. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used to reduce treatment-related toxicity. In this study, we compared the treatment outcomes and toxicities of adjuvant therapies for craniopharyngioma.
We analyzed patients who underwent craniopharyngioma tumor removal between 2000 and 2017. Of the 153 patients, 27 and 20 received adjuvant fractionated EBRT and SRS, respectively. We compared the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival between groups that received adjuvant fractionated EBRT, SRS, and surveillance.
The median follow-up period was 77.7 months. For SRS and surveillance, the 10-year LC was 57.2% and 57.4%, respectively. No local progression was observed after adjuvant fractionated EBRT. One patient in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT group died owing to glioma 94 months after receiving radiotherapy (10-year PFS: 80%). The 10-year PFS was 43.6% and 50.7% in the SRS and surveillance groups, respectively. The treatment outcomes significantly differed according to adjuvant treatment in non-gross total resection (GTR) patients. Additional treatment-related toxicity was comparable in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT and other groups.
Adjuvant fractionated EBRT could be effective in controlling local failure, especially in patients with non-GTR, while maintaining acceptable treatment-related toxicity.
颅咽管瘤术后辅助治疗存在争议。辅助外照射放疗(EBRT)会增加长期后遗症的风险。立体定向放射外科(SRS)用于降低治疗相关毒性。在本研究中,我们比较了颅咽管瘤辅助治疗的疗效和毒性。
我们分析了2000年至2017年间接受颅咽管瘤肿瘤切除术的患者。153例患者中,分别有27例和20例接受了辅助分次EBRT和SRS。我们比较了接受辅助分次EBRT、SRS和观察的组之间的局部控制(LC)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期。
中位随访期为77.7个月。对于SRS和观察,10年LC分别为57.2%和57.4%。辅助分次EBRT后未观察到局部进展。辅助分次EBRT组有1例患者在接受放疗94个月后因胶质瘤死亡(10年PFS:80%)。SRS组和观察组的10年PFS分别为43.6%和50.7%。在非全切除(GTR)患者中,治疗结果根据辅助治疗有显著差异。辅助分次EBRT组和其他组的额外治疗相关毒性相当。
辅助分次EBRT在控制局部复发方面可能有效,尤其是在非GTR患者中,同时维持可接受的治疗相关毒性。