Comparison of Tissue-Engineered Dermis with Micronized Adipose Tissue and Artificial Dermis for Facial Reconstruction Following Skin Cancer Resection.

Our group has previously demonstrated that tissue-engineered dermis containing cultured fibroblasts or adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cells is superior to artificial dermis in terms of scar quality for covering facial defects. However, using these cells for clinical applications requires Food and Drug Administration approval and involves complex procedures for cell culture or isolation. This retrospective study aimed to compare effects of tissue-engineered dermis containing micronized adipose tissue (MAT) and artificial dermis for facial reconstruction. Tissue-engineered dermis consisting of MAT seeded on artificial dermis was applied in 30 cases, while artificial dermis without MAT was grafted in 35 cases. Healing time and severities of scar contraction, color mismatch, and landmark distortion at one year after healing were evaluated. Wounds in the tissue-engineered dermis group re-epithelialized in 30.0 ± 4.3 days compared to 34.3 ± 5.4 days in the artificial dermis group ( < 0.05). The average dE2000 score in color mismatch analysis was 4.9 ± 1.7 in the tissue-engineered dermis group and 5.1 ± 1.7 in the artificial dermis group ( = 0.57). The extent of scar contraction was 16.2 ± 12.3% in the tissue-engineered dermis group and 23.2 ± 12.8% in the artificial dermis group ( < 0.05). The average severity grade of landmark distortion was 0.20 ± 0.50 in the tissue-engineered dermis group and 0.50 ± 0.71 in the artificial dermis group ( < 0.05). These findings indicate that tissue-engineered dermis grafts containing MAT are superior to artificial dermis grafts for facial reconstruction in terms of healing time, scar contraction, and landmark distortion severity. However, there was no significant difference in color mismatch between the two groups.