Suppr超能文献

加害者和受害者性别对跟踪严重性认知的影响。

Impact of Perpetrator and Victim Gender on Perceptions of Stalking Severity.

作者信息

Brenik Megan, Tuluceanu Ana-Cristina, Smillie Emma, Carpes Barros Cassal Luan, Mead Caroline, Mojtahedi Dara

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, School of Psychology, University of Bolton, Bolton BL3 5AB, UK.

Manchester Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(2):120. doi: 10.3390/bs15020120.

Abstract

Many individuals will dismiss the seriousness of ex-partner stalking offences, often as a result of inaccurate and problematic beliefs about the offence (stalking myths). However, to date, stalking myth acceptance measurements have only considered attitudes about stereotypical stalking (male stalking a female). The current research considered whether inaccurate and problematic perceptions of stalking were dependent on the gender and sexuality of the perpetrator, victim, and participant. Additionally, it examined whether existing stalking myth acceptance scales measuring stereotypical stalking attitudes would predict perceptions of stalking incidents that involved female stalkers and/or male victims. Participants ( = 336) completed the stalking myth acceptance scale and then responded to a series of questions measuring their perceptions towards a stalking vignette. An independent groups design was used to manipulate the gender of the stalker and victim. The need for police intervention was greatest for incidents involving a male stalker and a female victim. Female victims of male stalking were predicted as being the most fearful, whilst male victims of female stalking were rated as least likely to be fearful. Heterosexual males and participants with minority sexual orientations were also more likely to identify the perpetrator's actions as stalking. Finally, the SMA scales predicted participants' attitudes for stereotypical stalking cases but not for the other scenarios. The findings demonstrate that gender plays a significant role in stalking perceptions and highlights the need for more inclusive SMA measurements to consider problematic attitudes towards non-stereotypical stalking.

摘要

许多人会忽视前伴侣跟踪骚扰犯罪的严重性,这通常是由于对该罪行存在不准确且有问题的认知(跟踪骚扰误区)。然而,迄今为止,对跟踪骚扰误区的认知测量仅考虑了对典型跟踪骚扰(男性跟踪女性)的态度。当前的研究探讨了对跟踪骚扰的不准确和有问题的认知是否取决于犯罪者、受害者及参与者的性别和性取向。此外,研究还考察了现有的测量典型跟踪骚扰态度的跟踪骚扰误区认知量表,是否能预测对涉及女性跟踪者和/或男性受害者的跟踪骚扰事件的认知。参与者((n = 336))完成了跟踪骚扰误区认知量表,然后回答了一系列测量他们对一个跟踪骚扰小插曲看法的问题。采用独立组设计来操控跟踪者和受害者的性别。对于涉及男性跟踪者和女性受害者的事件,警方干预的需求最大。预计男性跟踪的女性受害者最为恐惧,而女性跟踪的男性受害者被评为最不可能感到恐惧。异性恋男性和具有少数性取向的参与者也更有可能将犯罪者的行为认定为跟踪骚扰。最后,跟踪骚扰误区认知量表预测了参与者对典型跟踪骚扰案件的态度,但对其他情况则不然。研究结果表明,性别在跟踪骚扰认知中起着重要作用,并凸显了需要更具包容性的跟踪骚扰误区认知测量方法,以考虑对非典型跟踪骚扰的问题态度。

相似文献

2
Post break-up stalking: Police-officers' perceptions.分手后跟踪:警察的看法。
Behav Sci Law. 2022 Sep;40(5):677-698. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2595. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
7
Same-gender stalking in Sweden and Australia.瑞典和澳大利亚的同性跟踪。
Behav Sci Law. 2011 Mar-Apr;29(2):202-19. doi: 10.1002/bsl.981. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
9
Stalking Behaviors Presented by Ex-Intimate Stalkers: A Victim's Perspective.前亲密关系跟踪者的跟踪行为:受害者视角。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP5074-NP5093. doi: 10.1177/0886260520934429. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

4
Juror decision-making in cases of rape involving high functioning Autistic persons.强奸案中高功能自闭症人士的陪审员决策。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Jul-Aug;77:101714. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101714. Epub 2021 May 29.
5
Routine Activities and Stalking Victimization in Sexual Minority College Students.常规活动与性少数大学生跟踪受害。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP11242-NP11270. doi: 10.1177/0886260521991879. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
The Prevalence and Effects of Stalking. stalking 的流行率和影响。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 May 15;117(20):347-353. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0347.
9
Stalking Victimization in LGBTQ Adults: A Brief Report.LGBTQ 成年人中的跟踪受害情况:简要报告。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Mar;35(5-6):1442-1453. doi: 10.1177/0886260517696871. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验