• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Prevalence and Effects of Stalking. stalking 的流行率和影响。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 May 15;117(20):347-353. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0347.
2
[Prevalence and impact of stalking in psychiatric patients].[精神病患者中跟踪行为的患病率及影响]
Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Oct;36(7):334-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220435. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
3
Prevalence of Stalking Among Justice Professionals in Portugal.葡萄牙司法专业人员跟踪癖的流行率。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP9548-NP9574. doi: 10.1177/0886260520983267. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
4
Stalking by patients: doctors' experiences in a Canadian urban area (Part II)--physician responses.患者的跟踪行为:加拿大城市地区医生的经历(第二部分)——医生的应对措施
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Jul;201(7):560-6. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318298241e.
5
Stalking experiences and associated factors--a controlled population-based study from Norway.跟踪经历及相关因素——来自挪威的一项基于人群的对照研究
Nord J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;68(5):347-54. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2013.844273. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
6
The Prevalence of Physicians Who Have Been Stalked: A Systematic Review.遭受跟踪的医生的患病率:一项系统综述。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Jun;43(2):177-82.
7
Cyberstalking in a large sample of social network users: prevalence, characteristics, and impact upon victims.大规模社交网络用户中的网络跟踪行为:流行率、特征及对受害者的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Feb;17(2):61-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0231. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
8
Prevalence of stalking in a psychiatric hospital population.精神病院人群中 stalking 的患病率。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;44(8):736-41. doi: 10.3109/00048671003742543.
9
What can we learn from the first community-based epidemiological study on stalking in Germany?我们能从德国第一项基于社区的跟踪骚扰流行病学研究中学到什么?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
10
Lifetime prevalence and impact of stalking in a European population: epidemiological data from a middle-sized German city.欧洲人群中跟踪骚扰行为的终生患病率及影响:来自德国一个中等规模城市的流行病学数据。
Br J Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;187:168-72. doi: 10.1192/bjp.187.2.168.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving women's health and well-being by exploring the impact of emotional, physical, and sexual intimate partner violence.通过探究情感、身体及性方面的亲密伴侣暴力的影响来改善女性的健康与福祉。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251324321. doi: 10.1177/17455057251324321. Epub 2025 Apr 12.
2
Impact of Perpetrator and Victim Gender on Perceptions of Stalking Severity.加害者和受害者性别对跟踪严重性认知的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;15(2):120. doi: 10.3390/bs15020120.
3
The psychological consequences of stalking: cross-sectional findings in a sample of Danish help-seeking stalking victims.跟踪的心理后果:丹麦寻求帮助的跟踪受害者样本中的横断面研究结果。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):1-16. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2281749. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
4
A critical analysis of stalking theory and implications for research and practice.对跟踪理论的批判性分析及其对研究和实践的启示。
Behav Sci Law. 2022 Sep;40(5):562-583. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2598. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
Stalking in clinical psychiatry: when the doctor becomes the victim.临床精神病学中的跟踪行为:当医生成为受害者时。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 29;44(4):464-5. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2022-2464.
6
[Mental Health Status in the Community During the COVID-19-Pandemic].[新冠疫情期间社区的心理健康状况]
Psychiatr Prax. 2020 Oct;47(7):361-369. doi: 10.1055/a-1222-9067. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Pain in the Acute Aftermath of Stalking: Associations With Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Depressive Symptoms, and Posttraumatic Cognitions.跟踪急性发作后的疼痛:与创伤后应激症状、抑郁症状和创伤后认知的关联。
Violence Against Women. 2020 Sep;26(11):1343-1361. doi: 10.1177/1077801219857829. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms in Secondary Stalked Children of Danish Stalking Survivors-A Pilot Study.创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状在丹麦 stalking 幸存者的二级被 stalk 儿童中——一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;16(5):725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050725.
3
The Impact of Stalking-Related Fear and Gender on Personal Safety Outcomes.跟踪相关恐惧和性别对个人安全结果的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):NP7465-NP7487. doi: 10.1177/0886260519829280. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Longitudinal Associations Among Negative Cognitions and Depressive and Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in Women Recently Exposed to Stalking.追踪骚扰事件刚发生不久的女性的消极认知与抑郁和创伤后应激症状之间的纵向关联。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jun;36(11-12):5775-5794. doi: 10.1177/0886260518807905. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
5
Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults.美国成年人亲密伴侣暴力的终身经济负担。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Oct;55(4):433-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
Stalking and Violence.跟踪与暴力
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;39(4):663-673. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
7
Health Care Professionals as Victims of Stalking: Characteristics of the Stalking Campaign, Consequences, and Motivation in Italy.作为跟踪骚扰受害者的医疗保健专业人员:意大利跟踪骚扰行为的特征、后果及动机
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Sep;32(17):2605-2625. doi: 10.1177/0886260515593542. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
8
The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature.世界卫生组织-5 幸福指数:文献系统综述。
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
9
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.性暴力、跟踪和亲密伴侣暴力受害的流行率和特征——2011 年美国全国亲密伴侣和性暴力调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Sep 5;63(8):1-18.
10
[Prevalence and impact of stalking in psychiatric patients].[精神病患者中跟踪行为的患病率及影响]
Psychiatr Prax. 2009 Oct;36(7):334-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220435. Epub 2009 Sep 1.

stalking 的流行率和影响。

The Prevalence and Effects of Stalking.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute for Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg.

出版信息

Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 May 15;117(20):347-353. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0347.

DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0347
PMID:32657747
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7373813/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2003, we carried out the first epidemiological study on the frequency and effects of stalking in Germany that was based on a random population sample. We repeated the study with the same design in 2018 in order to assess any potential alterations over time in the frequency of stalking and of psychological problems in the affected persons. As far as we know, this is the first replication study of this kind to be carried out anywhere.

METHODS

1000 women and 1000 men were randomly chosen from the residents' registration data of Mannheim, Germany. Each one of them received, by mail, a comprehensive questionnaire about stalking, as well as the WHO-5 Well-Being Index and the German version of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D).

RESULTS

In the Mannheim population samples (2003: N = 675; 2018: N = 444), the lifetime prevalence of being stalked was 11.6% in 2003 (95% confidence interval, [9.2; 14.4]) and 10.8% in 2018 [8.1; 13.7]. In both 2003 and 2018, persons who had been stalked had significantly worse mental well-being than unaffected persons (WHO-5 summated score 2003: 11.2 [9.7; 12.6] vs. 15.5 [15.1; 16.0], WHO-5 summated score 2018: 11.8 [10.1; 13.6] vs. 14.5 [13.9; 15.0]). A markedly higher percentage of persons who had been stalked also fulfilled the syndrome criteria for at least one mental disorder (PHQ-D 2003: 50.0% vs. 22.5%; odds ratio [OR]: 3.5 [2.1; 5.6], PHQ-D 2018: 46.5% vs. 24.4%; OR: 2.7 [1.4; 5.1]). In 2018, as in 2003, persons who had been stalked were dissatisfied with, or unaware of, the opportu - nities that they had to get help from the police and the judicial system.

CONCLUSION

Stalking remains a major problem that must be taken seriously. Physicians and psychologists should be well informed about it in order to help affected persons who turn to them for medical and psychological assistance.

摘要

背景

2003 年,我们进行了首次针对德国跟踪频率和影响的流行病学研究,该研究基于随机人口样本。为了评估随着时间的推移,跟踪行为的频率和受影响者的心理问题是否发生任何潜在变化,我们于 2018 年以相同的设计重复了这项研究。据我们所知,这是首次在任何地方进行此类复制研究。

方法

从德国曼海姆的居民登记数据中随机选择了 1000 名女性和 1000 名男性。他们每人通过邮件收到了一份关于跟踪的综合问卷,以及世卫组织幸福感量表(WHO-5)和德国版患者健康问卷(PHQ-D)。

结果

在曼海姆人群样本中(2003 年:N = 675;2018 年:N = 444),2003 年的终生跟踪患病率为 11.6%(95%置信区间,[9.2;14.4]),2018 年为 10.8%(8.1;13.7)。在 2003 年和 2018 年,被跟踪的人心理健康状况明显差于未受影响的人(2003 年 WHO-5 总和得分:11.2 [9.7;12.6] 与 15.5 [15.1;16.0],2018 年 WHO-5 总和得分:11.8 [10.1;13.6] 与 14.5 [13.9;15.0])。更多被跟踪的人也符合至少一种精神障碍的综合征标准(PHQ-D 2003 年:50.0%比 22.5%;优势比[OR]:3.5 [2.1;5.6],PHQ-D 2018 年:46.5%比 24.4%;OR:2.7 [1.4;5.1])。与 2003 年一样,2018 年被跟踪的人对他们从警察和司法系统获得帮助的机会不满意或不知情。

结论

跟踪仍然是一个必须认真对待的主要问题。医生和心理学家应该对此有充分的了解,以便帮助寻求医疗和心理帮助的受影响者。