• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于理论领域框架的乳腺癌筛查障碍与促进因素的人群调查。

A Population Survey on Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Screening Based on the Theoretical Domains Framework.

作者信息

Huf Sarah, Humphrey Ada, Darzi Ara, Cunningham Deborah, King Dominic, Judah Gaby

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Breast Surgery Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Rd, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;15(2):209. doi: 10.3390/bs15020209.

DOI:10.3390/bs15020209
PMID:40001840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11851805/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the UK, breast cancer affects 1 in 8 women, accounting for 31% of cancers and 15% of cancer-related deaths in women. In 2023, London's breast screening coverage was 56%, falling below the NHS target of 70%. This survey assesses psychological and behavioural factors impacting screening attendance.

METHODS

Using the Theoretical Domains Framework, an online survey including 15 behavioural factors was distributed through a market research company to women eligible for breast screening (aged 47-73) across London and Southeast and West England. Logistic regression was used to predict the impact of behavioural variables on history of attendance and intention to attend future screening opportunities.

RESULTS

Of the 922 respondents who returned the full survey, 88.6% intended to attend future screenings, and 88.1% reported previously attending screenings regularly. 'Behavioural regulation' had the strongest influence on past attendance (OR = 1.92, < 0.001) and future intent (OR = 1.56, = 0.003). Not intending to attend was linked to emotional consequences (OR = 0.68, = 0.003) and environmental barriers (OR = 0.66, < 0.001), where OR-Odds Ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey identifies behavioural factors influencing breast screening participation and screening intention, providing insights that may help design interventions to increase attendance rates.

摘要

背景

在英国,每8名女性中就有1人受乳腺癌影响,乳腺癌占女性癌症病例的31%,占女性癌症相关死亡人数的15%。2023年,伦敦的乳腺癌筛查覆盖率为56%,低于英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)设定的70%的目标。本次调查评估了影响筛查参与率的心理和行为因素。

方法

采用理论领域框架,通过一家市场研究公司,向伦敦以及英格兰东南部和西部符合乳腺癌筛查条件(年龄在47 - 73岁之间)的女性发放了一份包含15个行为因素的在线调查问卷。采用逻辑回归分析来预测行为变量对既往筛查参与史以及未来参与筛查意愿的影响。

结果

在922名完整回复调查问卷的受访者中,88.6%的人表示打算参加未来的筛查,88.1%的人报告称之前定期参加筛查。“行为调节”对过去的筛查参与情况影响最大(比值比[OR]=1.92,P<0.001),对未来的筛查意愿影响也最大(OR = 1.56,P = 0.003)。不打算参加筛查与情绪后果(OR = 0.68,P = 0.003)和环境障碍(OR = 0.66,P<0.001)有关,其中OR为比值比。

结论

本次调查确定了影响乳腺癌筛查参与率和筛查意愿的行为因素,为设计提高参与率的干预措施提供了参考依据。

相似文献

1
A Population Survey on Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Screening Based on the Theoretical Domains Framework.一项基于理论领域框架的乳腺癌筛查障碍与促进因素的人群调查。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;15(2):209. doi: 10.3390/bs15020209.
2
A population survey on beliefs around cervical cancer screening: determining the barriers and facilitators associated with attendance.关于宫颈癌筛查相关信念的人群调查:确定与参与相关的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Cancer. 2022 May 9;22(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09529-w.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Psychological predictors of intention and avoidance of attending organized mammography screening in Norway: applying the Extended Parallel Process Model.挪威人参加组织化乳腺癌筛查的意向和回避的心理预测因素:应用扩展平行过程模型。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01201-y.
5
An SMS and animated video intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.短信和动画视频干预以提高乳腺癌筛查率:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02133-5.
6
Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.伦敦市中心区乳腺癌筛查就诊预测因素的前瞻性研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):65-73. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.65.
7
Knowledge of cervical cancer and attendance at cervical cancer screening: a survey of Black women in London.宫颈癌知识与宫颈癌筛查参与情况:对伦敦黑人女性的一项调查
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 22;14:1096. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1096.
8
Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial.英国针对未参加乳腺癌筛查者的第二次定时预约的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):972-980. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30340-6. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Perceived barriers and facilitators to attendance for cervical cancer screening in EU member states: a systematic review and synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.欧盟成员国宫颈癌筛查参与的感知障碍和促进因素:使用理论域框架的系统评价和综合。
Psychol Health. 2022 Mar;37(3):279-330. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1918690. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
10
What factors are most influential in increasing cervical cancer screening attendance? An online study of UK-based women.哪些因素对提高宫颈癌筛查的参与率影响最大?一项针对英国女性的在线研究。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020 Aug 7;8(1):314-328. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1798239.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among under- and neverscreened women in Flanders, Belgium - a qualitative study on community and healthcare providers' perspectives.比利时佛兰德斯地区未接受和未定期接受宫颈癌筛查妇女的筛查障碍和促进因素 - 基于社区和医疗保健提供者观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):2870. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20166-9.
2
Correlates of intention-to-attend and confirmed cervical screening attendance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: Findings from Compass-PLUS, a prospective cohort study.澳大利亚新冠疫情期间宫颈癌筛查意向与实际参与情况的相关因素:前瞻性队列研究Compass-PLUS的结果
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Aug 5;45:102849. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102849. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
What factors influence the uptake of bowel, breast and cervical cancer screening? An overview of international research.哪些因素会影响肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的接受率?一项国际研究综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Aug 1;34(4):818-825. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae073.
4
A randomized controlled trial of a tailored navigation intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among intergenerational Southeast Asian women.一项针对东南亚跨代女性开展的、旨在促进乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的定制化导航干预随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Dec 20;37:101248. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101248. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
The prevalent factors of anxiety in women undergoing mammography.接受乳房X光检查的女性焦虑的普遍因素。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 18;14:1085115. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1085115. eCollection 2023.
6
Inequality in uptake of bowel cancer screening by deprivation, ethnicity and smoking status: cross-sectional study in 86 850 citizens.按贫困程度、族裔和吸烟状况划分的肠癌筛查参与度不平等:86850 名公民的横断面研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Nov 29;45(4):904-911. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad179.
7
Effect of invitation letter in language of origin on screening attendance: randomised controlled trial in BreastScreen Norway.邀请信原文语种对挪威乳腺 X 线筛查参与率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2023 Sep 19;382:e075465. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075465.
8
The effect of educational intervention based on the PEN-3 model on breast cancer screening behaviors.基于 PEN-3 模型的教育干预对乳腺癌筛查行为的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 1;11:1123888. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1123888. eCollection 2023.
9
Mobile Web App Intervention to Promote Breast Cancer Screening Among American Indian Women in the Northern Plains: Feasibility and Efficacy Study.移动网络应用干预措施促进大平原北部美国印第安妇女乳腺癌筛查:可行性与效果研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jul 20;7:e47851. doi: 10.2196/47851.
10
Breast Cancer Champions: a peer-to-peer education and mobile mammography program improving breast cancer screening rates for women of African heritage.乳腺癌冠军:一个同伴教育和移动乳房 X 光检查项目,旨在提高非洲裔女性的乳腺癌筛查率。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Jul;34(7):625-633. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01704-z. Epub 2023 May 3.