Versluis Anke, Boels Anne Meike, Huijden Maaike C G, Mijnsbergen Manon D, Rutten Guy E H M, Vos Rimke C
Department of Public Health and Primary Care/ Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diabet Med. 2025 May;42(5):e70002. doi: 10.1111/dme.70002. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
Diabetes self-management education (DSME) and support (DSME/S) delivered via mobile health (mHealth) is potentially cost-effective, if proven effective.
To assess the effectiveness of DSME, DSMS or DSME/S delivered by mHealth interventions compared to usual care (UC) or attention placebo control (APC) in adults with type 2 diabetes.
We searched (1) MEDLINE, (2) Embase, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online, (5) ClinicalTrials.gov, and (6) World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the year 2000 to January 31, 2023. We included RCTs comparing DSME/S delivered via mHealth versus UC or APC. Four authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Primary outcome was HbA1c, outher outcomes secundairy. Meta-analysed with random-effects model was used.
We included 43 trials involving 9328 participants; sample sizes ranging from 20 to 1119. Pooled effects on HbA1c were for DSME: mean difference (MD) of -4 mmol/mol (-0.3%), 95% CI -6 mmol/mol (-0.6%) to -1 mmol/mol (-0.1); p = 0.002; DSMS MD -4 mmol/mol (-0.4%), 95% CI 7 mmol/mol (-0.6%) to -2 mmol/mol (-0.2); p < 0.001; and DSME/S MD of -2 mmol/mol (-0.2%) for HbA1c, 95% CI -3 mmol/mol (-0.3%) to -0 mmol/mol (-0.0%); p < 0.001. We found uncertain effects on other outcomes.
mHealth interventions delivering self management education with or without support to adults with type 2 diabetes appear to have a modest beneficial effect on HbA1c. Only a few trials investigated patient-reported outcomes.
通过移动健康(mHealth)提供糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)和支持(DSME/S),若被证明有效,则可能具有成本效益。
评估与常规护理(UC)或注意力安慰剂对照(APC)相比,mHealth干预措施对2型糖尿病成人患者提供DSME、DSMS或DSME/S的有效性。
我们检索了(1)MEDLINE、(2)Embase、(3)PsycINFO、(4)通过Cochrane在线研究注册库检索Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、(5)ClinicalTrials.gov以及(6)世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,检索时间范围为2000年至2023年1月31日。我们纳入了比较通过mHealth提供的DSME/S与UC或APC的随机对照试验(RCT)。四位作者独立选择试验、评估偏倚风险并提取数据。主要结局为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),其他结局为次要结局。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
我们纳入了43项试验,涉及9328名参与者;样本量从20至1119不等。DSME对HbA1c的合并效应为:平均差(MD)为-4 mmol/mol(-0.3%),95%置信区间为-6 mmol/mol(-0.6%)至-1 mmol/mol(-0.1%);p = 0.002;DSMS的MD为-4 mmol/mol(-0.4%),95%置信区间为-7 mmol/mol(-0.6%)至-2 mmol/mol(-0.2%);p < 0.001;DSME/S对HbA1c的MD为-2 mmol/mol(-0.2%),95%置信区间为-3 mmol/mol(-0.3%)至-0 mmol/mol(-0.0%);p < 0.001。我们发现对其他结局的影响不确定。
对2型糖尿病成人患者提供有或无支持的自我管理教育的mHealth干预措施似乎对HbA1c有适度的有益影响。只有少数试验调查了患者报告的结局。