INTRODUCTION

The immune-mediated rejection of transplanted organs is a complex interplay between T cells and B cells, where the recognition of HLA-derived epitopes plays a crucial role. Several algorithms of molecular compatibility have been suggested, each focusing on a specific aspect of epitope immunogenicity.

METHODS

Considering reported death-censored graft survival in the SRTR dataset, we evaluated four models of molecular compatibility: antibody-verified Eplets, Snow, PIRCHE-II and amino acid matching. We have statistically evaluated their co-dependency and synergistic effects between models systematically on 400,935 kidney transplantations using Cox proportional hazards and XGBoost models.

RESULTS

Multivariable models of histocompatibility generally outperformed univariable predictors, with a combined model of HLA-A, -B, -DR matching, Snow and PIRCHE-II yielding highest AUC in XGBoost and lowest BIC in Cox models. Augmentation of a clinical prediction model of pre-transplant parameters by molecular compatibility metrics improved model performance particularly considering long-term outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that the use of multiple specialized molecular HLA matching predictors improves prediction performance, thereby improving risk classification and supporting informed decision-making in kidney transplantation.