Silva Júlia Ana Soares, Valentim Amanda Freitas, Telson Yasmim Carvalho, Salles Patrícia Vieira, Amaral Mariana Souza, Gama Ana Cristina Côrtes, Franco Letícia Paiva, Motta Andréa Rodrigues, Furlan Renata Maria Moreira Moraes
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
Codas. 2025 Feb 21;37(2):e20240151. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20240151pt. eCollection 2025.
To verify whether the breathing mode interferes with surface periorbital temperatures and propose a thermographic analysis method for this region.
Exploratory, observational, cross-sectional study. Thermographic images of 14 mouth-breathing and 14 nasal-breathing children were collected and analyzed using the Visionfy program (Thermofy®, Brazil) with breast 1 color scale. The ellipse tool delimited the region of interest (periorbital region) and a customized shape subdivided the region of interest into four arcs. The study collected maximum, mean, and minimum absolute and standardized temperatures of the arcs and performed interrater and intrarater comparisons and comparative analysis of temperatures between groups. Temperatures in the group of mouth breathers were compared with pruritus, hyperemia, tearing, and ocular edema.
the intrarater agreement indicated a satisfactory result for most analyzed temperatures. The interrater agreement, in general, was excellent for maximum, good for mean, and poor for minimum temperatures. The association between periorbital data and temperatures showed an association between ocular edema and temperatures in the upper and lower right arcs and between pruritus and the maximum temperature in the lower right arc.
the method had satisfactory intrarater and interrater agreement for maximum and mean temperatures. Ocular edema was associated with temperatures in the group of mouth breathers. Breathing mode was not associated with periorbital temperature.
验证呼吸模式是否会干扰眶周表面温度,并为此区域提出一种热成像分析方法。
探索性、观察性横断面研究。使用Visionfy程序(Thermofy®,巴西)和乳腺1色标,收集并分析了14名口呼吸儿童和14名鼻呼吸儿童的热成像图像。椭圆工具划定了感兴趣区域(眶周区域),并使用自定义形状将感兴趣区域细分为四个弧形区域。该研究收集了各弧形区域的最高、平均和最低绝对温度及标准化温度,并进行了评分者间和评分者内比较以及组间温度的对比分析。对口呼吸组的温度与瘙痒、充血、流泪和眼部水肿进行了比较。
评分者内一致性表明,大多数分析温度的结果令人满意。评分者间一致性方面,总体而言,最高温度的一致性极佳,平均温度的一致性良好,最低温度的一致性较差。眶周数据与温度之间的关联显示,眼部水肿与右上和右下弧形区域的温度之间存在关联,瘙痒与右下弧形区域的最高温度之间存在关联。
该方法在最高温度和平均温度方面具有令人满意的评分者内和评分者间一致性。眼部水肿与口呼吸组的温度有关。呼吸模式与眶周温度无关。