Crosby Eric S, Troop-Gordon Wendy, Witte Tracy K
Auburn University.
Auburn University.
Behav Ther. 2025 Mar;56(2):366-380. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2024.06.007. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
This randomized-controlled trial examined the efficacy of Sleep Scholar, a brief, internet-based insomnia intervention tailored to the needs of college students. College students commonly experience insomnia and various other mental health symptoms, including suicide ideation. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) is a promising suicide prevention effort for college students because insomnia is robust risk factor for suicide ideation and CBT-I reduces suicide ideation. Moreover, CBT-I can be brief, self-guided, and internet-based. CBT-I also may elicit less stigma than treatment specifically targeting suicide ideation. However, existing forms of brief CBT-I are neither self-guided nor internet-based, and existing forms of self-guided, internet-based CBT-I are not brief. In addition, previous iterations of CBT-I are not typically designed to address the unique sleep needs of college students. For this registered clinical trial, we recruited 61 college students with at least subclinical insomnia symptoms. Participants were randomized to either Sleep Scholar or a control condition, Building Healthy Habits. Participants completed pretreatment daily sleep diaries and surveys, a posttreatment assessment of acceptability and satisfaction, a 1-week and 1-month survey follow-up, and daily sleep diaries throughout the 1-month follow-up period. Results showed that Sleep Scholar was more acceptable and satisfactory compared to the control condition at posttreatment. However, Sleep Scholar was not more effective for improving sleep or mental health symptoms compared to the control condition. These findings suggest that modifications to Sleep Scholar are needed to improve its efficacy.
这项随机对照试验检验了“睡眠学者”(Sleep Scholar)的效果,这是一种基于网络的简短失眠干预措施,专门针对大学生的需求量身定制。大学生普遍存在失眠及各种其他心理健康症状,包括自杀意念。失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)对大学生来说是一种很有前景的自杀预防措施,因为失眠是自杀意念的一个有力风险因素,而CBT-I能降低自杀意念。此外,CBT-I可以是简短的、自我引导式的且基于网络的。与专门针对自杀意念的治疗相比,CBT-I引发的污名化可能也更少。然而,现有的简短CBT-I形式既不是自我引导式的,也不是基于网络的,而现有的自我引导式、基于网络的CBT-I形式并不简短。此外,CBT-I以前的版本通常并非设计用于满足大学生独特的睡眠需求。在这项注册临床试验中,我们招募了61名至少有亚临床失眠症状的大学生。参与者被随机分为“睡眠学者”组或对照条件组“养成健康习惯”(Building Healthy Habits)。参与者完成了治疗前的每日睡眠日记和调查问卷、治疗后对可接受性和满意度的评估、为期1周和1个月的调查随访,以及在整个1个月随访期内的每日睡眠日记。结果显示,与对照条件组相比,“睡眠学者”在治疗后更易被接受且更令人满意。然而,与对照条件组相比,“睡眠学者”在改善睡眠或心理健康症状方面并没有更有效。这些发现表明,需要对“睡眠学者”进行改进以提高其疗效。