Solvang Thale Amalie Westre, Herstad Vilde Bråten, Størdal Ketil, Tveiten Lars, Lang Astri, Eriksen Beate Horsberg, Rønnestad Arild, Stensvold Hans Jørgen
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Pediatric Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Feb 26;9(1):e003263. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003263.
To examine the distribution and time trends of admission temperature in very preterm infants, effects of temperature-preserving interventions and associations between hypothermia and outcomes.
Population-based cohort study of infants <32 gestational weeks without lethal malformations admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit within 2 hours of birth between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2021. Hypothermia was defined as mild (36.0°C-36.4°C), moderate (34.5°C-35.9°C) or severe (<34.5°C). Associations between admission temperature and outcomes were investigated using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for sex, weight Z-score, gestational age, antenatal steroids, surfactant and hospital.
In total, 2457/4879 (50.4%) had normal admission temperatures between 36.5°C and 37.5℃, 1314 (26.9%) had mild hypothermia and 886 (18.2%) had moderate to severe hypothermia, with a significant interhospital variance of 7%-40%. Moderate to severe hypothermia decreased from 24% in 2012 to 16% in 2021 (p<0.001). Measuring temperature before leaving the delivery unit correlated with lower incidence of moderate to severe hypothermia (42% vs 58%, p<0.001). Admission temperature was inversely associated with mortality (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.0 for moderate and 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.9 for severe hypothermia) and with surgical necrotising enterocolitis or intestinal perforation (adjusted OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.7 for moderate and 3.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 7.7 for severe hypothermia).
Although the incidence of hypothermia decreased during the study period, it remains a concern due to significant associations with adverse outcomes. Areas for further improvement include addressing interhospital variance and enhancing temperature monitoring in the delivery unit.
研究极早产儿入院时体温的分布及时间趋势、保暖干预措施的效果以及体温过低与预后之间的关联。
基于人群的队列研究,纳入2012年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间出生后2小时内入住新生儿重症监护病房、孕龄小于32周且无致命畸形的婴儿。体温过低定义为轻度(36.0℃-36.4℃)、中度(34.5℃-35.9℃)或重度(<34.5℃)。采用多因素logistic回归分析入院体温与预后之间的关联,并对性别、体重Z评分、孕龄、产前使用类固醇、表面活性剂和医院进行校正。
总共2457/4879例(50.4%)入院时体温正常,在36.5℃至37.5℃之间;1314例(26.9%)有轻度体温过低;886例(18.2%)有中度至重度体温过低,各医院之间差异显著,为7%-40%。中度至重度体温过低从2012年的24%降至2021年的16%(p<0.001)。在离开产房之前测量体温与中度至重度体温过低的发生率较低相关(42%对58%,p<0.001)。入院体温与死亡率呈负相关(中度体温过低校正比值比为1.5,95%置信区间为1.1至2.0;重度体温过低校正比值比为2.4,95%置信区间为1.1至4.9),与外科坏死性小肠结肠炎或肠穿孔也呈负相关(中度体温过低校正比值比为1.7,95%置信区间为1.1至2.7;重度体温过低校正比值比为3.1,95%置信区间为1.3至7.7)。
尽管在研究期间体温过低的发生率有所下降,但由于其与不良预后存在显著关联,仍然令人担忧。进一步改进的领域包括解决医院间差异以及加强产房的体温监测。