Suppr超能文献

1毫米层厚计算机断层扫描与3毫米层厚磁共振成像检测直肠癌盆腔外侧淋巴结转移的诊断能力比较

A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer.

作者信息

Kobayashi Ryutaro, Uehara Kay, Ebata Tomoki, Yatsuya Hiroshi, Li Yuanying, Hida Koya, Hashiguchi Yojiro, Ishihara Soichiro, Ogawa Shimpei, Shiomi Akio, Kawai Kazushige, Ajioka Yoichi

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w.

Abstract

AIM

The best modality for evaluating lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases from rectal cancer remains unclear. This study compared the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography (CT) and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying LPLN metastases based on size.

METHODS

This observational study analyzed not individual patients but 191 sides from 100 rectal cancer patients without preoperative treatment for whom preoperative CT and MRI and corresponding pathological results for LPLNs were available. A swollen LPLN was defined as an LN with a short-axis size of ≥5 mm on 1-mm CT.

RESULTS

LPLNs were detected significantly more frequently with 1-mm CT than with 3-mm MRI (p < 0.001). Among the 117 sides without swollen LPLNs, metastasis was observed in 1.7% of patients. In contrast, LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 28.4% of 74 sides with swollen LPLNs. In the evaluation of swollen LPLNs, 3-mm MRI yielded a 34% improvement in the diagnostic performance of LPLN metastasis over 1-mm CT (categorical net reclassification improvement: 0.341, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, 1-mm CT should be performed preoperatively to evaluate LPLNs. Further evaluations can be omitted in the absence of swollen LPLNs. In patients with swollen LPLNs, a careful assessment of LPLN metastasis should be conducted via additional MRI, even in early T-stage tumors.

摘要

目的

评估直肠癌侧方盆腔淋巴结(LPLN)转移的最佳方式仍不明确。本研究比较了1毫米层厚计算机断层扫描(CT)和3毫米层厚磁共振成像(MRI)基于大小识别LPLN转移的诊断能力。

方法

本观察性研究分析的不是个体患者,而是100例未经术前治疗的直肠癌患者的191侧LPLN,这些患者有术前CT和MRI检查以及相应的LPLN病理结果。在1毫米层厚CT上,短轴尺寸≥5毫米的LPLN被定义为肿大LPLN。

结果

1毫米层厚CT检测到LPLN的频率显著高于3毫米层厚MRI(p < 0.001)。在117侧无肿大LPLN中,1.7%的患者观察到转移。相比之下,在74侧肿大LPLN中,28.4%被证实有LPLN转移。在评估肿大LPLN时,3毫米层厚MRI在LPLN转移诊断性能上比1毫米层厚CT提高了34%(分类净重新分类改善:0.341,p = 0.045)。

结论

总之,术前应进行1毫米层厚CT以评估LPLN。若无肿大LPLN,则无需进一步评估。对于肿大LPLN的患者,即使是早期T分期肿瘤,也应通过额外的MRI仔细评估LPLN转移情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验