• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内脏神经松解术治疗腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移所致的重度癌痛。

Splanchnic neurolysis for severe cancer pain caused by abdominal paraaortic lymph node metastasis.

作者信息

Sato Tetsumi, Sato Tetsu, Kamo Yoshiko, Tanaka Rei

机构信息

Division of Palliative Medicine, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.

Palliative Care Team, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 26;33(3):227. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09291-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09291-2
PMID:40011278
Abstract

PURPOSE

Noxious stimuli caused by enlarged metastatic para-abdominal aortic lymph nodes (PAN) enter the spinal cord via the sympathetic nervous system, and the pain is sometimes resistant to conventional pharmacotherapy. The aim of this retrospective clinical investigation was to verify the efficacy and safety of splanchnic nerve neurolysis (SNN) for intractable abdominal and/or back pain caused by enlarged PAN.

METHODS

Among cancer pain patients referred to the Palliative Care Team in our hospital between April 2016 and November 2023, those who received SNN for pain relief, with abdominal and/or back pain due to PAN swelling which seemed to be a determining factor for opioid dosage, were all included. SNN was performed under X-ray fluoroscopy guidance in all the cases using a transdiscal approach through Th12/L1 or L1/2 intervertebral space.

RESULTS

Sixteen (6 male and 10 female) patients aged 55.1 ± 12.5 years were included. The major primary sites of malignancy were the esophagus, colon, rectum, and uterine cervix. The opioid doses (oral morphine equivalent) including rescue doses during the 24 h before, 1 week after, and 4 weeks after SNN were 427 ± 514.7, 267.1 ± 296.8 (p = 0.006), and 229.2 ± 230.9 (p = 0.035) mg/day, respectively. The numbers of rescue doses were 4.9 ± 3.0, 1.7 ± 2.6 (p = 0.003), and 2.3 ± 2.5 (p = 0.035) times/day, respectively. Both these parameters significantly decreased by SNN. Mild diarrhea for 2 to 3 days after SNN was observed in two patients.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that SNN is an effective and safe interventional treatment for intractable abdominal and/or back pain caused by enlarged PAN.

摘要

目的

增大的转移性腹主动脉旁淋巴结(PAN)引起的伤害性刺激通过交感神经系统进入脊髓,且这种疼痛有时对传统药物治疗有抵抗性。这项回顾性临床研究的目的是验证内脏神经溶解术(SNN)对由增大的PAN引起的顽固性腹部和/或背部疼痛的疗效和安全性。

方法

在2016年4月至2023年11月期间转诊至我院姑息治疗团队的癌症疼痛患者中,纳入所有因PAN肿大导致腹部和/或背部疼痛而接受SNN以缓解疼痛的患者,PAN肿大似乎是阿片类药物剂量的决定因素。所有病例均在X线透视引导下,采用经椎间盘途径通过胸12/腰1或腰1/2椎间隙进行SNN。

结果

纳入16例患者(6例男性和10例女性),年龄55.1±12.5岁。主要原发恶性肿瘤部位为食管、结肠、直肠和子宫颈。SNN术前24小时、术后1周和术后4周包括解救剂量在内的阿片类药物剂量(口服吗啡当量)分别为427±514.7、267.1±296.8(p = 0.006)和229.2±230.9(p = 0.035)mg/天。解救剂量次数分别为4.9±3.0、1.7±2.6(p = 0.003)和2.3±2.5(p = 0.035)次/天。这两个参数均因SNN而显著降低。两名患者在SNN术后出现2至3天的轻度腹泻。

结论

这些结果表明,SNN是治疗由增大的PAN引起的顽固性腹部和/或背部疼痛的一种有效且安全的介入治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Splanchnic neurolysis for severe cancer pain caused by abdominal paraaortic lymph node metastasis.内脏神经松解术治疗腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移所致的重度癌痛。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 26;33(3):227. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09291-2.
2
Prophylactic Perioperative Fluid Infusion Strategy During Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis to Prevent Systemic Hypotension: A Case Series of 70 Patients With Cancer.内脏神经松解术中预防全身低血压的围手术期预防性液体输注策略:70例癌症患者的病例系列
Pain Physician. 2025 Jan;28(1):51-57.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis Versus Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis in the Management of Abdominal Cancer Pain: A Meta-analysis of 359 Patients.腹腔神经丛神经松解术与内脏神经松解术治疗腹部癌痛的疗效和安全性:359 例患者的荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2024 Jan;27(1):1-10.
4
Comparison between radiofrequency ablation and chemical neurolysis of thoracic splanchnic nerves for the management of abdominal cancer pain, randomized trial.射频消融与化学神经松解术治疗腹部癌痛的比较:一项随机试验。
Eur J Pain. 2018 Nov;22(10):1782-1790. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1274. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
5
Management of chronic upper abdominal pain in cancer: transdiscal blockade of the splanchnic nerves.癌症慢性上腹痛的治疗:内脏神经经皮脊柱旁神经阻滞。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):500-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181fa6b42.
6
The Effectiveness of Alcohol Versus Phenol Based Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis for the Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Cancer Pain.酒精与苯酚内脏神经松解术治疗腹腔内癌痛的疗效比较
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):281-92.
7
Retrocrural splanchnic nerve alcohol neurolysis with a CT-guided anterior transaortic approach.CT引导下经主动脉前入路膈脚后内脏神经酒精松解术
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996 Jan-Feb;20(1):157-60. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199601000-00029.
8
Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Bilateral Neurolytic Celiac Plexus Block with Alcohol for Upper Abdominal Visceral Cancer Pain.计算机断层扫描引导下经皮双侧酒精性腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗上腹部内脏癌痛
Pain Physician. 2024 Nov;27(8):E919-E926.
9
Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block and Pain Relief, Survival, and Quality of Life in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.神经松解内脏神经阻滞与无法切除胰腺癌的止痛、生存和生活质量:一项随机对照试验。
Anesthesiology. 2021 Oct 1;135(4):686-698. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003936.
10
Percutaneous splanchnic nerve neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety for cancer-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮内脏神经松解术治疗癌性疼痛的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 6;31(6):324. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07746-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Prophylactic Perioperative Fluid Infusion Strategy During Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis to Prevent Systemic Hypotension: A Case Series of 70 Patients With Cancer.内脏神经松解术中预防全身低血压的围手术期预防性液体输注策略:70例癌症患者的病例系列
Pain Physician. 2025 Jan;28(1):51-57.
2
The differences in the anatomy of the thoracolumbar and sacral autonomic outflow are quantitative.胸腰段和骶部自主传出神经解剖的差异是定量的。
Clin Auton Res. 2024 Feb;34(1):79-97. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01023-6. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
3
Percutaneous splanchnic nerve neurolysis analgesic efficacy and safety for cancer-related pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
经皮内脏神经松解术治疗癌性疼痛的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 May 6;31(6):324. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07746-y.
4
Long-Term Analgesic Efficacy of Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block via the Transintervertebral Disc Approach to Retrocrural Space: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.经椎间盘入路至膈脚后间隙的内脏神经溶解阻滞的长期镇痛疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究
Pain Ther. 2023 Jun;12(3):825-840. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00506-0. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Fluoroscopy-Guided Splanchnic Nerve Block for Cancer-Associated Pain.荧光透视引导下内脏神经阻滞治疗癌痛
Cureus. 2022 Oct 31;14(10):e30944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30944. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Cancer Pain Treatment Strategies in Patients with Cancer.癌症患者的癌症疼痛处理策略。
Drugs. 2022 Sep;82(13):1357-1366. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01780-6. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
7
Splanchnic nerve neurolysis via the transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance: a retrospective study.透视引导下经椎间盘途径的内脏神经松解术:一项回顾性研究
Korean J Pain. 2022 Apr 1;35(2):202-208. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.2.202.
8
Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block and Pain Relief, Survival, and Quality of Life in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.神经松解内脏神经阻滞与无法切除胰腺癌的止痛、生存和生活质量:一项随机对照试验。
Anesthesiology. 2021 Oct 1;135(4):686-698. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003936.
9
Pain Control with Splanchnic Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Unresponsive to Celiac Plexus Neurolysis.内脏神经溶解术用于对腹腔神经丛神经溶解术无反应的胰腺癌患者的疼痛控制
J Pain Res. 2020 Aug 12;13:2023-2031. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S266689. eCollection 2020.
10
Low Volume Neurolytic Retrocrural Celiac Plexus Block for Visceral Cancer Pain: Retrospective Review of 507 Patients with Severe Malignancy Related Pain Due to Primary Abdominal Cancer or Metastatic Disease.低容量经后路腹腔神经丛阻滞治疗内脏癌痛:507 例原发性腹部癌症或转移性疾病相关严重恶性肿瘤疼痛患者的回顾性研究。
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):497-504.