Suppr超能文献

液体活检提高侵袭性非霍奇金大B细胞淋巴瘤体细胞突变检测特异性的研究:游离DNA与福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织的比较

Liquid Biopsy for Enhanced Specificity in Identifying Somatic Mutations in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Study of Cell-Free DNA and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue.

作者信息

Vimalathas Gayaththri, Cédile Oriane, Kjeldsen Marie Louise Grube, Thomassen Mads, Møller Michael Boe, Nyvold Charlotte Guldborg, Hansen Marcus Høy, Larsen Thomas Stauffer

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Haematology-Pathology Research Laboratory, Research Unit for Haematology and Research Unit for Pathology, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Lab Hematol. 2025 Aug;47(4):669-679. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14454. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor biopsy is the current mainstay of genotyping, but is limited by its invasiveness and tumor heterogeneity. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) constitutes a minimally invasive alternative that may better capture tumor-derived profiles from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This study compares the performance and genomic concordance of cfDNA and FFPE tumor DNA in aggressive non-Hodgkin large B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

Paired diagnostic FFPE tissue and plasma samples from 15 patients were sequenced with a custom 53-gene panel.

RESULTS

Detection thresholds were empirically guided at 1% variant allele frequency (VAF) for cfDNA and 10% for unpaired FFPE DNA. The median number of cfDNA variants was 6 (interquartile range (IQR): 2-11) versus 63 (IQR: 15-250) in FFPE DNA at 1% VAF. Collectively, 102 somatic variants were shared between cfDNA and FFPE DNA with a median of 5 (range: 0-23). cfDNA showed a five-fold lower median VAF for shared variants than FFPE DNA (7% vs. 36%, p < 0.0001). Eighty percent of patients harbored at least one cfDNA variant. A maximum cfDNA recall rate of 83% was observed at FFPE DNA VAF > 50%. COSMIC database overlap was twice as high for cfDNA compared to FFPE DNA (22% vs. 11%) at 10% VAF.

CONCLUSION

cfDNA has superior specificity for somatic mutation detection but lower sensitivity than FFPE DNA. Modest concordance was demonstrated between the two compartments. Our results support a complementary role of ctDNA in mutational profiling at a 1% VAF threshold in a pragmatic and clinically applicable setup.

摘要

引言

福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)肿瘤活检是目前基因分型的主要方法,但受其侵入性和肿瘤异质性的限制。血浆游离DNA(cfDNA)是一种微创替代方法,可能能更好地从循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)中捕获肿瘤衍生特征。本研究比较了cfDNA和FFPE肿瘤DNA在侵袭性非霍奇金大B细胞淋巴瘤中的性能和基因组一致性。

方法

对15例患者的配对诊断FFPE组织和血浆样本进行定制的53基因panel测序。

结果

根据经验,cfDNA的检测阈值为1%变异等位基因频率(VAF),未配对FFPE DNA的检测阈值为10%。在1%VAF时,cfDNA变异的中位数为6(四分位间距(IQR):2 - 11),而FFPE DNA为63(IQR:15 - 250)。cfDNA和FFPE DNA共有的体细胞变异有102个,中位数为5(范围:0 - 23)。cfDNA中共有变异的VAF中位数比FFPE DNA低5倍(7%对36%,p < 0.0001)。80%的患者至少有一个cfDNA变异。在FFPE DNA VAF > 50%时,观察到cfDNA的最大召回率为83%。在VAF为10%时,cfDNA与COSMIC数据库的重叠率是FFPE DNA的两倍(22%对11%)。

结论

cfDNA在体细胞突变检测方面具有更高的特异性,但灵敏度低于FFPE DNA。两个样本间表现出适度的一致性。我们的结果支持在实用且临床适用的设置中,ctDNA在1%VAF阈值的突变分析中起互补作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c9d/12239701/45bea1c7237a/IJLH-47-669-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验