Reply to Ye: Parallel progress in funder practices and expansion of academic incentives to support engaged research.
作者信息
Bednarek Angela T, Miyamoto Ben
机构信息
Scientific Advancement, The Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC 20004.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2500539122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500539122. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Ye: Parallel progress in funder practices and expansion of academic incentives to support engaged research.对叶的回复：资助者实践与学术激励措施扩展以支持参与式研究的并行进展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2500539122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500539122. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
2
Adoption of World Health Organization Best Practices in Clinical Trial Transparency Among European Medical Research Funder Policies.世界卫生组织临床试验透明度最佳实践在欧洲医学研究资助者政策中的采用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2222378. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22378.
3
Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors.学术机构与产业界在临床试验中的合作：对出版物的横断面研究和主要学术作者的调查。
BMJ. 2018 Oct 3;363:k3654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3654.
4
Open access, open data, FAIR Data and their implications for life sciences researchers.开放获取、开放数据、FAIR数据及其对生命科学研究人员的影响。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2018 Dec 21;2(6):759-762. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20180163.
5
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.用真话激励法来衡量可疑研究行为的发生率。
Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):524-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797611430953. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
6
How and why funders support engaged research.资助者如何以及为何支持参与式研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 7;122(1):e2400931121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400931121. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
7
Funder and authors' financial conflicts of interest information in trial publications: adequacy of reporting and obtaining missing information.试验出版物中资助者和作者的利益冲突信息：报告的充分性及获取缺失信息的情况
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jun;182:111786. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111786. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
8
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素：公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
9
10
Academic librarians at play in the field of cheminformatics: building the case for chemistry research data management.学术图书馆员在化学信息学领域发挥作用：构建化学研究数据管理的案例。
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2014 Oct;28(10):975-88. doi: 10.1007/s10822-014-9777-4. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
本文引用的文献
1
Potential limiting factor on engaged research: Academic evaluation systems.参与式研究的潜在限制因素：学术评价体系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2500271122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500271122. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
2
How and why funders support engaged research.资助者如何以及为何支持参与式研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 7;122(1):e2400931121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400931121. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Innovation, entrepreneurship, promotion, and tenure.创新、创业、推广和任期。
Science. 2021 Sep 17;373(6561):1312-1314. doi: 10.1126/science.abj2098. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
Zotero 插件