• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

资助者如何以及为何支持参与式研究。

How and why funders support engaged research.

作者信息

Bednarek Angela T, Miyamoto Ben, Corbett Kristin, Hudson Charlotte, Scarrow Gayle, Brass Maeghan, DuMont Kim, Holmes Bev, Supplee Lauren, McLean Robert, Bhatia Jaspal, Chappell Shamira, Gorman Vélez Maggie, Kolavalli Chhaya

机构信息

The Pew Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC 20004.

Policy and Evaluation Division, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON K1G 3H9, Canada.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 7;122(1):e2400931121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400931121. Epub 2024 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2400931121
PMID:39793032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11725928/
Abstract

Research that better aligns policy, practice, and research communities is gaining momentum around the world. This includes engaged research strategies that bring partners, and their diverse perspectives and kinds of knowledge, together to shape research agendas with on-the-ground-needs and to create dynamic problem-solving processes. These approaches aim to generate more equitable and effective solutions to societal challenges. Although many of these partnered strategies have a longstanding history, entrenched research cultures, practices, and institutional structures stand in the way of scaling them. Given the outsized role funders play in shaping research efforts, funders are a critical lever for change. This perspective describes the efforts of a global collaborative of philanthropic and public funders who are adapting their practices, supporting the development of infrastructure (e.g., capacity-strengthening, facilitation expertise, processes to guide relational work, etc.), and targeting system-level challenges to enable engaged research to maximize its potential. The authors integrate insights from different issue areas, geographies, and funding areas to provide concrete examples of funder activities that support engaged research and to suggest areas for further action. Recommendations include scaling changes in funding practices, deepening understanding of how and when engaged research leads to improved outcomes, and reshaping how success is defined and measured.

摘要

使政策、实践和研究群体更好地协调一致的研究正在全球范围内蓬勃发展。这包括参与式研究策略,该策略将合作伙伴及其多样的观点和各类知识汇聚在一起,根据实际需求制定研究议程,并创建动态的问题解决流程。这些方法旨在为社会挑战生成更公平、有效的解决方案。尽管其中许多合作策略有着悠久的历史,但根深蒂固的研究文化、实践和制度结构阻碍了它们的推广。鉴于资助者在塑造研究工作方面发挥着巨大作用,资助者是推动变革的关键杠杆。这一观点描述了一个由慈善和公共资助者组成的全球合作组织所做的努力,他们正在调整自身做法,支持基础设施建设(如能力强化、促进专业知识、指导关系工作的流程等),并针对系统层面的挑战,以使参与式研究发挥最大潜力。作者整合了来自不同问题领域、地域和资助领域的见解,提供了资助者支持参与式研究活动的具体实例,并提出了进一步行动的领域。建议包括扩大资助实践的变革规模,加深对参与式研究如何以及何时能带来更好成果的理解,以及重塑成功的定义和衡量方式。

相似文献

1
How and why funders support engaged research.资助者如何以及为何支持参与式研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 7;122(1):e2400931121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400931121. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Adopting recommendations for implementing patient involvement in cancer research: a funder's approach.采纳关于在癌症研究中实现患者参与的建议:资助者的方法。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 1;9(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00410-z.
4
Translating research into action: an international study of the role of research funders.将研究转化为行动:研究资助者角色的国际研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 24;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0316-y.
5
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Adoption of World Health Organization Best Practices in Clinical Trial Transparency Among European Medical Research Funder Policies.世界卫生组织临床试验透明度最佳实践在欧洲医学研究资助者政策中的采用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2222378. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22378.
8
Achieving equitable leadership in Global Health partnerships: barriers experienced and strategies to improve grant funding for early- and mid-career researchers.在全球卫生伙伴关系中实现公平领导:早期和中期职业研究人员所面临的障碍以及改善资助资金的策略
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024;2(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00047-4. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
9
Reflections on philanthropy and organizing in the United States.关于美国慈善事业与组织工作的思考。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Nov;49(8):3215-3231. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22715. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact upfront: novel format for Novo Nordisk Foundation funding.前期影响:诺和诺德基金会资助的新形式。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Sep 2;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01385-x.
2
Understanding UK policymakers' evidence needs through policy questions.通过政策问题理解英国政策制定者的证据需求。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05911-3.
3
An agenda for science communication research and practice.科学传播研究与实践议程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400932122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400932122. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
4
Transformative community-engaged science: Strengthening relationships between science and society.变革性社区参与科学:加强科学与社会之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400929122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400929122. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
5
Current landscape of cancer genomics research in sub-Saharan Africa - a review of literature.撒哈拉以南非洲地区癌症基因组学研究的现状——文献综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 17;15:1512005. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1512005. eCollection 2025.
6
Potential limiting factor on engaged research: Academic evaluation systems.参与式研究的潜在限制因素:学术评价体系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2500271122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500271122. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
7
Reply to Ye: Parallel progress in funder practices and expansion of academic incentives to support engaged research.对叶的回复:资助者实践与学术激励措施扩展以支持参与式研究的并行进展。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 11;122(10):e2500539122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500539122. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact.研究合作产出:一种未被充分利用的影响途径。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8461. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8461. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
Enabling usable science takes a community: Using our roles as funders to catalyze change.要实现可用的科学需要一个社区:利用我们作为资助者的角色来催化变革。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun 10;22(6):e3002675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002675. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Developing a practice-driven research agenda in implementation science: Perspectives from experienced implementation support practitioners.在实施科学中制定以实践为导向的研究议程:经验丰富的实施支持从业者的观点。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Sep 3;4:26334895231199063. doi: 10.1177/26334895231199063. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Characterizing Canadian funded partnered health research projects between 2011 and 2019: a retrospective analysis.描述 2011 年至 2019 年间加拿大资助的合作健康研究项目:回顾性分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Sep 8;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01046-x.
5
Community and partner engagement in dissemination and implementation research at the National Institutes of Health: an analysis of recently funded studies and opportunities to advance the field.美国国立卫生研究院中社区及合作伙伴参与传播与实施研究的情况:对近期资助研究及推动该领域发展机遇的分析
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jul 12;4(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00462-y.
6
Evaluating the quality of research co-production: Research Quality Plus for Co-Production (RQ + 4 Co-Pro).评估研究合作生产的质量:合作生产的研究质量加(RQ + 4 Co-Pro)。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 13;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00990-y.
7
Prevention Science for Reducing Health Disparities.减少健康差异的预防科学。
Prev Sci. 2023 May;24(4):597-601. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01535-z. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
8
Understanding how and under what circumstances integrated knowledge translation works for people engaged in collaborative research: metasynthesis of IKTRN casebooks.理解集成知识转化如何以及在何种情况下适用于参与合作研究的人员:IKTRN 案例手册的元综合。
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Sep 1;21(3):277-293. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000367.
9
Building trusting relationships to support implementation: A proposed theoretical model.建立信任关系以支持实施:一个拟议的理论模型。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 23;2:894599. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.894599. eCollection 2022.
10
Building the foundation for equitable and inclusive research: Seed grant programs to facilitate development of diverse CBPR community-academic research partnerships.为公平和包容性研究奠定基础:种子基金项目助力多元社区-学术研究伙伴关系的发展。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 24;7(1):e2. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.495. eCollection 2023.